That is...yes, just yes.
That is... no, just no.
Even though it was designed nearly 20 years ago, it's a pretty good intermediate design between the Constitution-class (refit) and the Excelsior-class.
That is...yes, just yes.
That is... no, just no.
Obsessed ? What are you talking about ? I think you have me confused with someone else.
Obsessed ? What are you talking about ? I think you have me confused with someone else.
No mistake. You were the one who kept pushing the idea of a TV series set in the alternate timeline, and you've indicated that your favorite ship is the Constitution-class of that universe.
Even though it was designed nearly 20 years ago, it's a pretty good intermediate design between the Constitution-class (refit) and the Excelsior-class.
Yep. Not a single post of yours in the Trek XI+ forum. So you really do hate new Trek.
Belz... said:I simply asked why some people wanted to go back to the old one.
We're going to have to disagree on that. I think it looks like exactly what it is: a fan design that tries way too much to be cool.
I don't think it "tries way too much to be cool" no more than any other design, be it fan- or professionally-made. It just may not be to your fancy (which is fine), but that's about it.Even though it was designed nearly 20 years ago, it's a pretty good intermediate design between the Constitution-class (refit) and the Excelsior-class.
We're going to have to disagree on that. I think it looks like exactly what it is: a fan design that tries way too much to be cool.
That's true. While fan designs can vary in quality, there are definitely some that I would put up against those actually used onscreen.Sran said:What's wrong with a fan design? The Titan was a fan design if I remember correctly.
That's true. While fan designs can vary in quality, there are definitely some that I would put up against those actually used onscreen.
And you kept asking... and asking... and asking.
What's wrong with a fan design? The Titan was a fan design if I remember correctly.
I simply don't like this one.
That's true. While fan designs can vary in quality, there are definitely some that I would put up against those actually used onscreen.Sran said:What's wrong with a fan design? The Titan was a fan design if I remember correctly.
Beauty, as they say, is in the eye of the beholder.
And you'll notice I'm not going to ask you why a second time.
Clarifying your question is not asking it again.
Clarifying your question is not asking it again.
Yes, that's exactly what it is.
Ah, well there's the source of the misunderstanding then. You think that, if person B misunderstands a question from person A, person A musn't make any attempt to clear the misunderstanding lest he repeats his question. That's mistaken, of course, but at least now I have a good idea what went wrong, there.
We're going to have to disagree on that. I think it looks like exactly what it is: a fan design that tries way too much to be cool.
What's wrong with a fan design? The Titan was a fan design if I remember correctly.
--Sran
Nothing wrong with fan designs. But the NX-1701-A is hideous.
You may not like it--and even I would go for another design--but compared to others I've seen, it's not that bad.We're going to have to disagree on that. I think it looks like exactly what it is: a fan design that tries way too much to be cool.
What's wrong with a fan design? The Titan was a fan design if I remember correctly.
--Sran
Nothing wrong with fan designs. But the NX-1701-A is hideous.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.