^ Nobody wanted to jinx it. Thanks a lot!
Damn, I certainly hope Gaiman is writing another episode, but I'm not holding my breath. He's extremely busy.Neil Gaiman is the only one that I can think of, since RTD has returned to the UK...*When he mentions that the writer of Episode 12 is in a "distant land" one name springs immediately to mind...
Are we meant to infer from that quotation which name springs to your mind? because personally I haven't the faintest clue.
I guess we still could end up with more Doctor Who then ever in 2013 depending on how many specials there are and also how long they are in duration?
That's what was always baffling about people getting excited over the "more than ever" line. Doctor Who is already on a year-round production schedule (by which I mean that the hiatus between production seasons is already at about its minimum length), and there's some evidence they're having trouble meeting that; the only way they're ever going to get more than one extra episode a year is by shorting the year before or the year after. And the extra six-month gap before this series even started shooting was a big clue in that regard...(Plus you have to ignore that eight of those episodes are ones that should have aired this year under normal circumstances.)
I'm far more interested in the budget allocations and the shooting schedule. Money and time was allocated for an anniversary special per old reports, so is that special still going to be produced in this season's block? If not, is that money being spent on this season or is it being held back to finance production of the specials in the spring? (If the allocated money is spent on the current season, then Moffat owes the BBC an episode and the specials will have to spread the hypothetical five episodes over money for four. Expect a "Shades of Gray"-esque clip show.)Even if they did five hour long specials (and stripped them across the 19th to 23rd of November, perhaps?), you'd still come out with only a few minutes more. Which might be technically correct but hardly the impression that was originally given.
I hope we don't get a historical companion. The companion is 'us'. If both the Doctor and the companion can't provide us with a contemporary point of view, we may lose something which, for me, is an integral part of the show's success.
I don't know about that. One of the most popular companions Doctor Who in history was Jaime, a Scot from 1745.I hope we don't get a historical companion. The companion is 'us'. If both the Doctor and the companion can't provide us with a contemporary point of view, we may lose something which, for me, is an integral part of the show's success.
I don't know about that. One of the most popular companions Doctor Who in history was Jaime, a Scot from 1745.
Then, there's Victoria, and, even though she was from the future, Leela.
In any case, people from the 1800's weren't drooling idiots. Anyone with an education would understand the concept of phones, airplanes and the like.
Damn, I certainly hope Gaiman is writing another episode, but I'm not holding my breath. He's extremely busy.Neil Gaiman is the only one that I can think of, since RTD has returned to the UK...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.