Timo said:
Considering the general track record of the economic "science", being king of that particular hill isn't exactly an achievement.
Hear, hear.
Having studied economics at the graduate level, I would venture to say that about two-thirds of the hypotheses in economics used to predict outcomes are faulty and not backed up by real-life evidence. As a 'science', therefore, it leaves a great deal to be desired.
But I do have to agree with horatio83 on the Austrian school, which takes all the blind spots of economics and turns them into a dogma and thus sinks economics to even more unfathomable depths of crazy. By boiling down economic study to a set of empirically-unverifiable axioms, the Austrians have done away with all the trappings of the scientific method, even though they still like to play-act at being scholars.
This and other statements would seem to suggest that the Klingons have something similar to a modern twenty-first century model economic system. What we saw in The House of Quark was a classic hostile takeover. The House of D'Ghor wanted to merge with the House of Kozak, who were unwilling to do so. House D'Ghor encouraged House D'Hor to move into debt, weakening it in the eyes if the rest of the Empire (lowering it's stock price), with the ultimate aim of acquisition. With House Kozak's assets ("lands and property") added to its own, House D'Ghor would have increased in power, and might have achieved council status.
The fact that H'Ghor was able to do this without the council being the wiser does appear to favor the Hayek model. The various Klingon family houses are independent, controlling property (land and business asset), their own military's (House Kozak possessed "forces"), and have financial means.
All without much oversight or overt control by the Klingon Council.
Ehhh... be careful here. Nobles backbiting and backstabbing each other for land and military advantage is not something which was invented along with the joint-stock venture; nor was the traditional limitation of the power of the king over his vassals. Grilka may be using the language of 'investment' only because she is speaking with a Ferengi (and, hell, she was once
married to a Ferengi), but it was clear from the episode that at least some Klingons found such financial dealings and skulduggery distasteful, if not outright dishonourable. I still think we're looking at an advanced feudal society in the Klingons.
Timo said:
So actually, no.
That is, the canon evidence is for a class society rather than a caste one. Indeed, this very dialogue might be taken to describe political changes in free class movement... Something a caste system would utterly prohibit.
Dammit, Timo - stop saying things I agree with! You're stealing my thunder.
Upward class mobility seems to have been difficult in the Klingon Empire, as we see in the story of General Martok. Martok started off as basically a pauper, got rejected from the Klingon version of OCS by Kor, and basically crawled his way up the chain of command from a civilian labourer position. But yeah, class is not absolute and fixed for you and all your descendants - so it isn't really a caste system.