Yeah, but it's been a very long time, I can't remember much.Have you ever been in a car accident?
the case the home owner's insurance company will state that it was pretty clearly Discovery's fault, especially with the police report, and Discovery's insurance company will have no choice to pay out.
The homeowners' insurance companies have to pay nothing and do nothing but act as a mediator between their clients and Discovery's insurance.
I *know* it is obviously Discovery's fault and they will ultimately pay out.
I always assumed that any claim at all, regardless of fault, results in increased premiums.
I *know* it is obviously Discovery's fault and they will ultimately pay out. But I was wondering whether the homeowners' premiums will go up anyway - simply for filing a claim in the first place - even though they are not at fault. Are you saying this will not happen? I always assumed that any claim at all, regardless of fault, results in increased premiums. Here is a link which explains my reasoning.
For the final act in the "Blow Your Socks Off" myth (revisit, maybe?), they went to a quarry near a town to set off a detonation in an effort to see if they could blow the socks off of any of their fake feet set at varying distances. They set off the detonation and the myth was busted, but the detonation was a bit bigger than they had anticipated. The blast didn't do any damage, but the shockwave moved through the town damaging property, breaking windows, etc. After that incident, they were barred from doing their thing at or near that town again.I must have missed this one. Can anyone explain further?I doubt we'll see any of this in the show, however, much like we didn't find out why they were banned from an area due to a similar incident until a recent compilation show.
I'm not sure, though, that avoiding any mention of the incident in the show is the best way to take responsibility. I mean, nobody was hurt, the damage will be paid for, and this could be a good teaching opportunity. What they should do is focus a whole segment on the incident and examine the science of exactly what happened and why. Presumably they'd take a more solemn tone than usual, but given all the attention this has attracted, it feels like it'd be a missed opportunity if they didn't address the science of it.
Heck, I bet if the owners of the houses and the minivan had been fans of the show, their reactions might've been more like "Whoo, I had a brush with the Mythbusters! What an honor to have my house/car wrecked in the name of awesome science! Can I be on the show now?"
I'm not sure, though, that avoiding any mention of the incident in the show is the best way to take responsibility. I mean, nobody was hurt, the damage will be paid for, and this could be a good teaching opportunity. What they should do is focus a whole segment on the incident and examine the science of exactly what happened and why. Presumably they'd take a more solemn tone than usual, but given all the attention this has attracted, it feels like it'd be a missed opportunity if they didn't address the science of it.
Heck, I bet if the owners of the houses and the minivan had been fans of the show, their reactions might've been more like "Whoo, I had a brush with the Mythbusters! What an honor to have my house/car wrecked in the name of awesome science! Can I be on the show now?"
The impression I've gotten out of everything has been that the folks who owned the damaged property are not particularly happy about the incident. The Mythbusters likely decided not to show it out of respect for the folks- avoiding profiting from a major accident that was a major problem for everyone and could have potentially turned tragic.
I would say that they're doing a decent job taking responsibility for the incident. They're not shying away from it, they're not trying to put responsibility on someone else, and they've made it a point multiple times to make sure that it's known that they feel horrible, they're working to make it right, and they're trying to make sure it never happens again. I'm not sure they can do much better than that.
They visited the scene of the damage, talked with the families involved, have assured those families that all damages would be taken care of, and took steps to ensure that this could never happen again.. In deference to those families, they decided not to air the actual firing segment on their show..
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/07/BAN31M9Q81.DTL
Pretty responsible..esp. in comparison with most local politicians..
I still find the distance and trajectory of the cannonball to be pretty amazing. But if I understood things right had they done this a few minutes earlier the cannonball may very well have killed or critically injured someone.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.