When was 947 feet established?

Discussion in 'Star Trek - The Original & Animated Series' started by trekkist, Mar 19, 2011.

  1. trekkist

    trekkist Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Has anyone knowledge of exactly when in TOS production history the ship's size was nailed? Obviously it was unknown during "The Cage," and revised upward (as was the crew size) later...and I've seen an excerpt from the 1967 draft writer's guide that describes the hangar deck as big enough to hold "a fleet of jetliners." There's also a memo in Making of ST that suggests the possibility of a viewport, through which one could see the nacelles, "thousands of feet long and hundreds of feet over our heads."

    I'm assuming the only canonical use of the figure was in the scale bar of Matt Jeffries' 3-view, as printed in Making in 1968. Any idea of the date of that drawing?

    David Winfrey
     
  2. Shaw

    Shaw Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Location:
    Twin Cities
    November 7, 1964
     
  3. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    My first birthday!
     
  4. Forbin

    Forbin Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Location:
    I said out, dammit!
    I predict that even though the question was answered concisely in the very first reply, this thread will go on for 10 pages. :)
     
  5. scotpens

    scotpens Professional Geek Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Location:
    City of the Fallen Angels
    In other Trek news:

    Is Starfleet military?

    Does the bridge of the TOS Enterprise face forward?

    Do Vulcans have sex only once every seven years?

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Yes.

    Probably not.

    Thats the official story, but probably not.

    :lol:
     
  7. trekkist

    trekkist Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Not that I doubt your certainty, Shaw, but would you mind citing your source? (assuming you weren't being sarcastic)
     
  8. trekkist

    trekkist Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    "Parted from me and never parting, never and always, touching and touched" -- and Spock's sensing of the death of the crew of the Intrepid -- suggests the answer to "How often do Vulcans have sex?" is "as often as they like." Telepathically, that is. Which explains their constantly calm demeanor. They're always gettin' it.

    Spock?

    One moment, Captain. Ah. Uh...you were saying?

    I SAID, would you like some lunch?

    Affirmative. And perhaps a cigarette.
     
  9. SonicRanger

    SonicRanger Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2001
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    This is an excellent question, and I wonder about this too, especially since even the newest edition of the Concordance repeats the "fleet of jetliners" line regarding the shuttlebay.
     
  10. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in it's final stage
    All I'll add is that 947' doesn't work with the generally accepted (i.e. used in all the licenced stuff) 23 decks unless you pretend the sets are shorter (8') than they actually were (around 10').

    BTW, JJ Abrams totally embraced the "fleet of jetliners" thing:techman:
     
  11. Captain Robert April

    Captain Robert April Vice Admiral Admiral

    I'll have to see about that...
     
  12. antiquityscion

    antiquityscion Commander

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    I don't know of any Star Trek episode that establishes the Enterprise as 947 feet long. I think that length is established by the Star Trek Encyclopedia or MR. Scotts Guide, and other similar books. The largest ship I have ever seen up close is the USS Midway in San Diego, and it is 972 feet long.

    [​IMG]

    This is probably about what the scale is, going by the aforementioned books comparing the Midway to the Enterprise.

    [​IMG]


    I think Voyager is around the same size of NCC1701/1701A.
    Star Trek III establishes the Excelsior & Enterprise B as almost 50% larger than the Constitutions.

    [​IMG]


    The Enterprise B is the same as the Excelsior (467 meters\1532 feet), Enterprise C (526 meters\1725 feet), and Enterprise D (642 meters\2106 feet).
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2011
  13. Captain Robert April

    Captain Robert April Vice Admiral Admiral

    If it wasn't "established" in the public's mind when the studio sent out copies of that famous three-view drawing to fans and reporters, it was certainly nailed down with the first printing of "The Making of Star Trek" and the release of the AMT model with that same schematic on the side of the box.
     
  14. Captain Robert April

    Captain Robert April Vice Admiral Admiral

    Incidentally, this is before principal photography began on "The Cage", so no, it wasn't "unknown" at that time.
     
  15. trekkist

    trekkist Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    I'm still awaiting Shaw's elucidation of whether or not his citation of a precise date was serious.

    Logic suggests the ship's size wasn't established until well into the first season, given construction of a hangar deck miniature too large (via its size relative to the shuttlecraft) to fit inside the ship. Thus the "properly" sized hangar bay of STV, and the visibly shrunken hangar bay of the Remasterds (both of which appear jarring to my eye).

    Anyone have their copy of Making handy? Date of the "nacelle viewing window" would be a not-before-this-date factoid.
     
  16. Albertese

    Albertese Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 3, 2003
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I'd trust Shaw's calendar. He has exhaustively researched the design and construction timeline of both Enterprise models used on the show so he knows his business. He has posted his research in lengthy detail on these hallowed boards.

    I wonder if the screenplay was written off of earlier assumptions, though, and the dialog simply was never run by Matt "The Man" Jefferies. Given the nature of television production, this seems highly likely to me. Besides, even the crew figures given in "The Cage" don't really disagree with any other known technical quantity of the ship later. There just happens to be more people on it. Maybe Pike's mission demanded fewer people than Kirk's. No biggie.

    --Alex
     
  17. Captain Robert April

    Captain Robert April Vice Admiral Admiral

    The memo in question:

    I think this should be chalked up to Gene getting a little carried away with the idea.
     
  18. Shaw

    Shaw Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Location:
    Twin Cities
    It was serious.

    But you didn't need to wait for me to tell you that. Either the forum search feature or a google search would link you to plenty of posts where I've elaborated further.

    But you've already made up your mind on the subject...
    ... so what would be the point of discussing it any further (unless you are trying to hit 10 pages).
     
  19. Forbin

    Forbin Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Location:
    I said out, dammit!
    Told ya! :lol:
     
  20. Admiral Buzzkill

    Admiral Buzzkill Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Bingo. There never was such a reference.

    Which simply means that the length is not "canonical" in the only relevant sense. It doesn't mean that the length wasn't established for production purposes, in drawings like the elevations that Jefferies did and which have been available publicly at least since one was first reproduced in Analog and possibly before that.