^ Yeah, my thoughts too.
In fact, if a band can't get it together to produce a whole album's worth of good material I don't consider them worth the effort of listening to at all. There's a ton of bands out there who can do it, why waste my time on bands that can't?
I tend to agree, but that attitude is very much in the minority and probably always was. I read something in the past year from a media consulting firm that has research on how many digital tracks a listener has per artist. I was surprised to see that the average was 1.1 tracks-per-artist!
The LP album definitely had a heyday in the '60s and '70s, but the casual listener was always interested in singles. It was the formats that were geared toward albums. There was a stigma against 45 singles, because they were cheap, brittle material and didn't sound as good as 12-inch vinyl, especially when consumers started getting into "Hi-Fi". Tape formats and CDs were bad for singles because of their wasted capacity. Some of the desire for single tracks was met by taping from the radio or swapping albums among friends to make mix tapes. Digital audio files have allowed the market for single track purchase, which was always there, to thrive and dominate.
--Justin