Deja Dead by Kathy Reichs.
In the battle between Enterprise and Frankenstein, the Enterprise uses tractor beams to ram Frankenstein into a nearby moon. Only problem is that tractor beams don’t work on ships with shields (BoBW, the Borg couldn’t hold Enterprise until her shields failed), and earlier we were told Frankenstein was using traditional deflector shields for defence.
Near the end, when they’re trying to infect the planetoid with the anti-Borg virus and it manifests an obstruction blocking the torpedo, everyone mysteriously forgets that they could just beam the torpedo directly into the planet’s mantle. Especially strange considering they beam a torpedo onto the Frankenstein mid-battle earlier in the book.
Picard’s little cry seemed totally wrong for his character IMO...
and I don’t think he needs an appointment with the ships’ counsellor to decide who to take on his missions.
Deja Dead by Kathy Reichs.
Am I the only one who finds the Reichs' books repetitive? Brennan stumbles into/gets involved with grisly stuff, can't resist going it alone to prove she can while mourning/courting the next man and then has said man come save her. I read the first three and then gave them all to a friend, no thanks. As for Cornwell, I read the first twelve but they lost what made them good IMHO. I feel that many authors who keep the same lead character in a series for so long lose the edge and are just churning out books. One particular British author has done a brilliant job of ageing his character in real time. Ian Rankin's Inspector Rebus books are a joy to read, even 20 years after he started writing them.The whole series is excellent reading. If you like her, you might also like Patricia Cornwell's Kay Scarpetta series.
^
I liked the movie version of that too.
In addition, long threads tends to turn away new participants, and this thread looks like one that's just going to keep going.
I have too many. Got about 80 trek books to read and about 15 non-Trek, plus five months worth of New Scientist magazines to read from last year.I'm out of books. Gonna have to go cold turkey for a few days.![]()
I say skip New Scientist and read Scientific America. Though the quality of science in SciAm has gone down a bit too, but at least it doesn't have those newspaper style speculative articles that NS has.plus five months worth of New Scientist magazines to read from last year.
But the spec articles are great fodder for story ideas. It's the primary reason I read the magazine, well and it's interesting too for the most part. I've got enough ideas from the NS magazine to give me enough novels for three lifetimes, not including all the ideas I come up with on my own. I'll have to write synopses and leave them for my kids to write.I say skip New Scientist and read Scientific America. Though the quality of science in SciAm has gone down a bit too, but at least it doesn't have those newspaper style speculative articles that NS has.plus five months worth of New Scientist magazines to read from last year.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.