In states like this, the common people just go about their lives pretty much the same way regardless of who's in power at the moment, because they're all pretty much equally dictatorial.
^Can a people really be so lethargic?
Just tragic....![]()
^Can a people really be so lethargic?
Just tragic....![]()
^Can a people really be so lethargic?
Just tragic....![]()
^Can a people really be so lethargic?
Just tragic....![]()
You really, really need to study your history. Lethargy has nothing to do with it. On the contrary, the reason the masses generally don't care much about the political games being played among the elites is because the masses are too busy farming or otherwise working to support their families, and don't have the time or luxury to be spectators to those games. Also because generally, when we're talking about a dictatorial or imperial kind of state like the Romulan Star Empire (or the Roman Empire or Chinese dynasties or what-have-you), the changes in power at the top don't have that much effect on the lives of the people down below, because the common folk are going to be just as disenfranchised and powerless no matter which group of nobles or royals or other elites manages to seize power from their rival elites. If the rebels seeking to overthrow the king are going to tax and exploit the peasants just as much as the sitting king does, why should the peasants root for either side? No, they just try to keep their heads down and stay out of the way. They go on with their farming and smithing and cobbling and weaving and so forth, try to keep themselves and their children fed, and hope that the nonsense at the top doesn't trickle far enough down to inconvenience them any more than normal.
As for the romulans - I think even the common people care that they went from a superpower to weaklings in need of help, thanks to Shinzon&Tal'Aura. This could explain IRS's support from its populace.
I'll bet on it. Let's hope Donatra remains the "good guy", and doesn't get caught up in her absolute power....
Well, it's true that realpolitik can never truly be reduced to white hats and black hats. But Tal'aura pretty much directly assassinated every last one of her own colleagues in the Senate, whereas Donatra rebelled against Shinzon when she realized his intent was to commit genocide against Earth, arguing to her colleagues that such an act would be a stain on their honor. Think about that. Tal'aura murdered people she knew personally and worked alongside every day, while Donatra was willing to risk her own life to protect strangers from an enemy nation. So I'd say there's very good reason to expect that Donatra's approach to governance would be more ethical and less ruthless than Tal'aura's..
I don't think Donatra seized power for the sake of personal ambition like Tal'aura did. I think she did it because she felt it was necessary for the good of her people.
No Breg was trying to overthrow a leader who was having trouble dealing with unrest on other Romulan worlds like the one Picard and Crusher were on which made Tal'aura look incompetent, becuase if you can't deal with upset subjects and insurgents how can you deal with the empires real enemies. Not to mention that after the whole Braeg was resolved it was found that the Romulans might have had a pandemic on their hands which to cure could have cost them an entire planet.I'll bet on it. Let's hope Donatra remains the "good guy", and doesn't get caught up in her absolute power....
Well, related to this, and what I think it implies, there's no real evidence Tal'aura is the "bad guy". Sure, she's power hungry, having grabbed the Praetorship, but Donatra has essentially done the same thing. They're both dictators. Donatra may be more friendly to the Federation, and seem a more likable or sympathetic individual, but there's no evidence Tal'aura treats the people of the Empire any worse than the usual Romulan leader. Sure, there was unrest in "Death in Winter", but that's because the charismatic Braeg was doing his best to whip the populace up and overthrow a leader he objected to.
from the RSE viewpoint) that traitor Donatra, who stole from the Empire and left the people to starve,
and shes done it without making the RSE dependent on the Federation (the Typhon Pact is the answer instead).
No Breg was trying to overthrow a leader who was having trouble dealing with unrest on other Romulan worlds like the one Picard and Crusher were on which made Tal'aura look incompetent.I'll bet on it. Let's hope Donatra remains the "good guy", and doesn't get caught up in her absolute power....
Well, related to this, and what I think it implies, there's no real evidence Tal'aura is the "bad guy". Sure, she's power hungry, having grabbed the Praetorship, but Donatra has essentially done the same thing. They're both dictators. Donatra may be more friendly to the Federation, and seem a more likable or sympathetic individual, but there's no evidence Tal'aura treats the people of the Empire any worse than the usual Romulan leader. Sure, there was unrest in "Death in Winter", but that's because the charismatic Braeg was doing his best to whip the populace up and overthrow a leader he objected to.
(from the RSE viewpoint) that traitor Donatra, who stole from the Empire and left the people to starve,
Which Tal'aura failed to prevent even though she KNEW about it in advance which if it ever got out would cause massive reputation damage.
and shes done it without making the RSE dependent on the Federation (the Typhon Pact is the answer instead).
Unless of course the Pact falls apart, because if that happens the citizens of Romulus are more likely to send Donatra the gift of Tal'aura's severed head on a platter.
^Romulus is not the entire Romulan Empire, just its capital. If the United States lost Washington DC, New York, and the vicinity, we'd be badly crippled, but it probably wouldn't be the end of the nation. We'd relocate the capital and rebuild. Heck, the Roman Empire did lose its capital and the entire western half of it collapsed, but it already had a secondary power base in Byzantium, and the Eastern Roman Empire (or the Byzantine Empire as we often call it) endured for another thousand years after the fall of Rome.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.