I'd also be intrigued if the franchise somehow ended up with the Terminator approach, with even the filmed material existing in multiple continuities...
Given the new movie, it seems to be a possibility...
I'd also be intrigued if the franchise somehow ended up with the Terminator approach, with even the filmed material existing in multiple continuities...
What I meant was actual simultaneous filmed productions in more than one continuity, the way that Terminator: Salvation and Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles exist in mutually-exclusive timelines.Given the new movie, it seems to be a possibility...I'd also be intrigued if the franchise somehow ended up with the Terminator approach, with even the filmed material existing in multiple continuities...
Hopefully not. Shatner and Nimoy are Kirk and Spock while the others are just copies.
Who was that little Vulcan toddler in ST III, then? And then the Vulcan boy, teenager and young man?
They were all Spock at a younger age, played by other actors 'cos Nimoy couldn't play them with a lot of makeup and suspension of disbelief.
What I meant was actual simultaneous filmed productions in more than one continuity, the way that Terminator: Salvation and Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles exist in mutually-exclusive timelines.Given the new movie, it seems to be a possibility...I'd also be intrigued if the franchise somehow ended up with the Terminator approach, with even the filmed material existing in multiple continuities...
I would speculate as time went on, the vast majority of the stories would come from the altered timeline.
Well, we don't see those younger Spocks on any cover, do we?![]()
Hopefully not. Shatner and Nimoy are Kirk and Spock while the others are just copies.
Oh, so I guess you already have seen the movie to make this statement?
Who was that little Vulcan toddler in ST III, then? And then the Vulcan boy, teenager and young man?
They were all Spock at a younger age, played by other actors 'cos Nimoy couldn't play them with a lot of makeup and suspension of disbelief.
Well, we don't see those younger Spocks on any cover, do we?![]()
Hopefully not. Shatner and Nimoy are Kirk and Spock while the others are just copies.
Oh, so I guess you already have seen the movie to make this statement?
Nah, it's just more "logic" from Lynx.
Who was that little Vulcan toddler in ST III, then? And then the Vulcan boy, teenager and young man?
They were all Spock at a younger age, played by other actors 'cos Nimoy couldn't play them with a lot of makeup and suspension of disbelief.
Well, we don't see those younger Spocks on any cover, do we?![]()
And still more "logic." Besides, I believe there is an old human proverb with regard to judging a book by its cover...
Christopher, won't the period of time from ~2250's to 2290's have stories with the altered timeline, versus the 22d century and late 24th century which will continue onward the same?
And since the two timelines coexist, there's no reason there couldn't still be TOS fiction set in the original timeline alongside the new-timeline stuff. It might become less common, perhaps, but I see no reason to assume it would cease to exist.
Seems difficult to me - you'd have to spend the entire book never describing the ship, for one.
^ I was thinking more of the interiors. The bridge set, in particular--where we would expect our crew to spend a fair amount of time--is radically different.
There's a very easy solution. All novels that are set in the JJ universe, will have Quinto and Pine, and all novels set in the Shatner-Nimoy-everything-else universe, will feature those two.
Easy, really.
^ I was thinking more of the interiors. The bridge set, in particular--where we would expect our crew to spend a fair amount of time--is radically different.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.