• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

My review of "Kobayashi Maru" [SPOILERS!]

^Dude, Sappho. But yes, different periods and locales have tended to treat homosexuality either with acceptance, opposition or denial, and for whatever reason, male and female homosexuality were treated as different entities up until about the mid-19th century (and, to a lesser extent, still is in certain media).

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
 
Weighing in here with my .02 worth as well. I just finished KM Friday night in the parking lot of my wife's workplace, killing time while it rained. Overall, I enjoyed the book greatly, the final few chapters really, really eager to get my hands on the third volume. In fact, I found myself wishing I could just drive over to Barnes & Noble to pick up The Romulan War and continue reading.

I'll probably post a more detailed post later on, but for right now, a big thumbs up. Andy and Micheal did a great job. It's a shame they couldn't worked on the show itself.


:techman:
 
Second, I am not happy that Pocket Books sanctioned the use of the f-word in Star Trek for the first time at the beginning of chapter 44. I don`t mind the word “shit” (or variations like “Merde”, “Scheisse”, even the mismatched and misused “Scheisskopf” from the first Destiny book) as an exception of the rule and if it is really fitting into the situation in question. But in this case, there was no need for swearing whatsoever. On top of that I had the feeling the authors wanted to be clever by putting this word play into the book. It wasn`t clever. It was crude and annoying and most definitely unnecessary. Yes, I know, some people use the f-word all the time and don`t think anything of it. That doesn`t mean it is a good idea and I disagree with it that introducing this word into Star Trek books is something desirable.

Interestingly, Andy Mangels posted on PsiPhi that the f-word wasn't in the manuscript that he and Mike submitted (link). Assuming the passage still existed in the book, I'm curious as to how it was originally written, and why the editors decided to drop the f-word into it?
 
That is indeed a very good question. I certainly wouldn`t be happy if I wrote a book and I find out later that someone thought it is a good idea to drop the f-word into it.
 
Interestingly, Andy Mangels posted on PsiPhi that the f-word wasn't in the manuscript that he and Mike submitted (link). Assuming the passage still existed in the book, I'm curious as to how it was originally written, and why the editors decided to drop the f-word into it?
Actually, he says it's not in the version they submitted before edits, and then he suggests that Mike could have added it in in addition to Margaret.
 
^ D'oh, you're right. For some reason, I misread that one line as "either Marco or Margaret". I even wondered at the time why two editors would be editing the same book. I didn't completely understand it, but that's why I used the plural "editors" in my post above. So it could have been the other co-writer that added it. Apologies for any unintentional misdirection.
 
Overall I thought it was a great novel. One complaint I had with it though was the toward the begining of the book, with the Horizon. The part where they left the book, chicago mobs of the 20th century. Now correct me if I'm wrong, I thought it was a starfleet ship, Daedalus class, not a the NCS Horizon.
 
That's fanon. In "A Piece of the Action," no mention is made of whether the Horizon was a Starfleet ship or not. There was a model of a Daedalus-class Horizon in Sisko's office, but there's no reason to think it was the same ship as the one mentioned in TOS.
 
Also, a book called Chicago Gangs of the Twenties (a typo for Chicago Mobs of the Twenties) was seen on the bookshelf in Travis's room on ECS Horizon in the episode "Horizon," making it pretty clear that that was intended to be the ship that visited Iotia. The novel was simply following the show's precedent.
 
Then again, "Bread and Circuses" suggests that civilians don't have to mind the Prime Directive much, and "Angel One" later supports this notion. Yet Kirk thinks that the crew of the Horizon would have acted differently had the PD existed back then. So, a Starfleet vessel after all...? (Or did Starfleet perhaps hire the ECS ship, subjecting her to Starfleet regulations but not removing the civilian crew or their personal items?)

Also, did ECS Horizon have a transporter aboard? The pseudo-gangsters seemed versed on the operation and limitations of the transporter at times ("cain't move till dey're through sparklin'"), even if a bit surprised when the device was first used. But the ECS ship might have been later fitted with the device. Or the Iotians might have been technologically advanced (after all, they managed to build an imitation of the 1920s Chicago easily enough) and merely playing stoopid.

Personally, I like it that not every single ship from the late 22nd century is assumed to be a Daedalus. The Essex explicitly is, but otherwise, we aren't painted in a corner. Except perhaps in case of the Horizon: if she is Starfleet, then the model on Sisko's table is a good candidate. Although of course Starfleet might have had half a dozen ships named Horizon, and the particular one that contaminated Sigma Iotia could have been of a later model.

Timo Saloniemi
 
You don't get to call off in the face of the enemy. If you aren't sick enough to be admitted to sickbay under a doctor's care, you aren't too sick to do your job.

Gosh, I must remember that for the next time I have the same complaint as Reed supposedly had. Should I warn my work colleagues in advance?
 
I'm hoping that we see a few more Daedalus-class ships, as well as a few other types of Starfleet vessels in The Romulan War. I'm guessing that they went into service prior to the NX series, and as such, have a top speed of only Warp 3, maybe?
 
I'm hoping that we see a few more Daedalus-class ships, as well as a few other types of Starfleet vessels in The Romulan War. I'm guessing that they went into service prior to the NX series, and as such, have a top speed of only Warp 3, maybe?

Hmm... kinda contradicts Starfleet: Year One, which has the Daedalus class as an all new class... after the Romulan War.

But then, Enterprise's general premise of a pre-Fed Starfleet kinda threw that miniseries under-da-bus....
 
'Course, we might make a series of "minor course corrections" ex post facto.

* The Daedalus herself might have been titular the ship from Dave Stern's novel, the superfast Cascade Ion Drive vessel, but the loss of the prototype in that novel put the program on ice and Archer's dilithium-engined Enterprise got budgetary preference. The Daedalus class ships already built received humbler engines and got second-rate jobs mentioned in the other ENT novels.

* It was only after the war that the Daedalus class, a dedicated exploration ship rather than a better-engined development of old warship designs, was put to actual production. When our ST:Year One protagonists discuss the ship, most of it has already been designed, including the hull and engines; they are just debating the equipment to be put aboard. So the book doesn't really claim that the ship would be new as such.

* The earlier United Earth Starfleet might have gone by a number of names and nicknames, and it just happens that none of the UESF officers we saw was in the habit of using the official name of his organization in dialogue.

* The early years of the UFP might have been spent in an organizational chaos that was half old UE, half the thing we have learned to know through AotF and the like. Many a title and organizational detail would change during those early years.

And so forth. Might be worth the trouble. I'm not particularly fond of MJF's style of writing, and the story told there might not be all that inspiring (I've only read the serialized form). But it would be nice to have an alternate viewpoint to those years that one could believe in.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Finished this book this morning. Overall, not bad. It builds nicely on The Good that Men Do, but out of the M & M ENT books, my favorite is still Last Full Measure.

It took me forever to read this book. I think it was too long. The plot was a bit too convoluted and it took forever to get there. The journey wasn't a bad one. I enjoyed their take on Trip and T'Pol, Valdore, Reed, and Archer. Toward the end I loved how Mayweather and the crew's opinions changed regarding Archer.

However, I don't quite get why the Coalition decided to declare war on the Romulans when some of the Councilors were skeptical that it was actually the Romulans behind everything. Also, I don't get why the Vulcans didn't at least say that their ships had also been captured to bolster the argument that it was the Romulans behind it all?

If I recall, some of the Councilors thought the Klingons might've still been behind the attack on Draylax, the Kobayashi Maru, and the outposts, or suspected a possible Klingon-Romulan alliance. But instead of sending envoys or at least making the attempt, the COP declares war. It doesn't make much sense to me. They don't even know the relative size of Romulan territory, the scope of the Romulan military, or even what the Romulans look like. So, who exactly are they going to be fighting?

I think they should've just had the Romulans invade Draylax, Denobula, or some other world so the COP would have a clearer rationale and no choice but to go to war.

When the Xindi attacked Earth, Earth sent Enterprise out to investigate/find the weapon and neutralize it, but they didn't declare war. Earth was clearly not on a war footing when the Xindi launched the finished planet killer. There were no starships and I don't think any orbital defense platforms, etc. protecting Earth when the thing came close to wiping out Earth. So, the rush to war, without adequate preparation, strikes me as a bit odd and perhaps rushed for storyline purposes.

I was confused about Sopek and what side he was really on (which I suppose was on purpose), or why the Romulans even revealed themselves in the Gamma Hydra system when they were taking the Kobayashi Maru.

I also didn't like the crew from the KB, particularly Vance. I also thought the depiction of the woman he was having relations with was a bit offensive. She came off like a hooker or something and I don't think that was needed in this novel.

The Columbia was a welcome addition to the book. I enjoyed many of the Ramirez/Archer scenes, same with the Admiral Gardner/Archer scenes, but I think M & M did a poor job setting up the Columbia for the Destiny series. They pretty much just forgot about the Columbia after they helped defend Alpha Centauri. A little more foreshadowing would've been welcome.

Getting rid of the Horizon was unnecessary too. Any generic ship could've been dispatched like that and achieved the same purpose to show off the telecapture device. I think it was a waste of good characters. Hopefully the writers will at least compensate Mayweather with more scenes to show how he copes and is affected by his families disappearance/death. I also hope they come up with something for Hoshi to do. She seems to get neglected in this books a bit too much. This D.O. character gets more screentime than her.

Though KB wasn't a great book, I liked their take on ENT enough to give the next book a shot.
 
Finished the book last week and have been meaning to write up a review. It's probably no secret that I found The Good That Men Do ludicrous, and as such considered Kobayashi Maru to be make or break when it comes to the future of ENT fiction. It didn't exactly break... but it came nowhere near make, unfortunately. Insofar as KM had bipartite plots that was essentially two books in one, I'd say I liked--with reservations--one book, and didn't like the other.

The first book, centered around Archer and following the political and military machinations in the lead up to the Romulan, held my interest with sufficient amounts of intrigue and brisk pacing, even though most of the latter had more to do with the small, numerous chapters than the plot per se. I like that it flitted about a numbers of settings--Enterprise, Columbia, Earth (government, media and civilian), Horizon, Kobayashi Maru--to try and create a broad impression of how the path to war unfolded and how various people and political entities reacted to it. The opening salvoes of this conflict are not simple--nor should they be, considering that we have an opponent best known for guile than direct conflict--and the largess of the canvas across which it plays out helps illuminate the intricate sequences of moves and countermoves.

That said, however, I didn't think the scope was large enough, at least in terms of who was represented. Almost all perspectives in this portion of the book are human, and the imbalance creates a rather skewered picture of local politics and what motivates the other groups involved. The council scenes, in particular, are far too simplistic in that Samuels and al-Raschid, time and time again, appear to be the only sane and well-intentioned people in the room, trying to negotiate a fragile alliance of bumptious, pig-headed and paranoid aliens. So uni-directional is the protrayal here than one almost wonders why humanity bothers with this Coalition at all, when they spend most of their time appeasing the apparent whims of their insufferable allies. A few scenes written from the perspective of the Andorians, the Tellerites, the Draxlax(ians?) would have gone a long way towards combatting this human-centric and nigh-Manichean portrayal of the Coalition.

Related to this is the conceptual gap between Our Heroes and Starfleet Command. Seen from the perspective of Archer or Hernandez, Starfleet Command comes across as stubbornly ignorant, callous and mercenary in their motives. This is all the stranger in that I think a good case could be made for Starfleet's caution, given that humanity was embroiled in a manufactured conflict with the Xindi barely a year ago; it's not Starfleet's fault that Our Heroes' hunches always turn out correct, or that they have access to evidence that Archer and his conspirators are actively concealing from Starfleet. A few scenes from Command's perspective would have helped put their actions in context beyond Archer's righteous indignation.

Another scene I found puzzling is Columbia at Draylax. The ship is on it's way to Draylax, responding to the distress signal, when Admiral Someone comes onscreen and tells Hernandez that she has to defending the Draylaxians--which she was doing anyway--because it has a mutual defence treaty with Alpha Centauri and Draylax is a potential coalition partner. Suddenly everybody is bitching that they're being sacrificed for political expediency. Er, what? Never mind that they are potential allies or that you're helping uphold treaties (the analogy to the First World War here is somewhat spurious, since the Romulans are against everybody)--innocent people are in danger, and you don't want to help because there might be a political upshot to it? One gets the impression that some of the Columbia crew would have preferred to just sit on the outskirts of the system and watch if the battle had proved too daunting. You people call yourselves Starfleet officers? We're a far cry away from Rachel Garrett, that's for sure.

Another problem in both this and the other part of the book was language. The book is chok full of alien terminology; scenes written from Klingon or Romulan perspectives abound with italicized terms whose meaning one might guess at from context. Most of the time this is possible, but I really wish this book had carried a glossary, particularly for Romulan culture which is so radically different from what has been seen onscreen since the authors opted for a depiction of Romulans more aligned with that old Rihannsu series.

If the first book was largely interesting despite the aforementioned problems of persective, the second book--Charles '003' Tucker and his amazing friends--drags the entirety of the novel down. If I was expecting KM to make some motions towards explaining some of the absurdities and patching up the gaping plotholes of TGTMD, I would be disappointed. On the other hand, I thought that might actually have the benefit of not getting this particular novel mired in the inexplicable, Byzantine schemes of its predecessors--that one might start from a ridiculous premise, but what unfolds from there would still work in and of itself. Tucker as spy has already been established, however nonsensically, so a reader here doesn't have to worry about justifying it. Unfortunately, despite a good start, this Tucker storyline likewise degenerates into the absurd.

At first, things seemed to be going logical enough. I was pleased that Tucker had actually been discovered and was being used to feed misinformation back to the Coalition; when a person with zero intelligence experience is parachute-dropped into this kind of cloak and dagger world, my expectation would be that he'll soon be dead or he'll get played, which is what happens here. But from here we are soon entangled into another series of improbable events and impossible escapes, as Valdore decides to send the man he knows is a spy on a critical mission with only one chaperone. This reflects of pattern of thoroughly incompetent villains who cannot have possibly have gotten into the positions they are in now if they've always been this inept.

One of the near escapes Tucker pulls off is being rescued by T'Pol and Reed seconds before Terix blows him into his constituent atoms. This, apparently because T'Pol had a vision of him in danger back towards the beginning of the book. So not only does this super-duper psychic link traverse the better part of a quadrant, but it can also see the future. I hope we eventually get an explanation for what's going on between T'Pol and Tucker, like a mental version of quantum entanglement or something, because right now her psychic powers approach the magical (and magical plot device). As a testament to how the idiocy of the Tucker storyline infects everything it touches, T'Pol, on the basis of a bad dream that could be nothing more than bad plomeek soup that day, decides she'll abandon her post, steal a shuttlepod and go wandering about deep in enemy territory in the hope of bumping into a person who, for all she knows, is already dead. Oh, and Reed finds out and decides to tag along, likewise abandoning his post even as the stormclouds of war begin to gather, because he feels guilty over placing Tucker in this situation to begin with (as well he should, coming up with that nonsense and then presenting it to an emotionally vulnerable man), but two acts of lunacy do not make a right. So T'Pol and Reed manage to miss out on most of the incipient conflict brewing amonst the major spacefaring powers... and for what? They save Tucker's bacon, he promptly proceeds to throw a hissy fit because he's worried about his cover (how do you maintain your cover when you're dead, you ungrateful asshole?), then, because whining immaturity is such a turn-on, a quickie in the shuttlepod and they just as soon part ways, Tucker deciding that his inept performance as a spy is just too valuable to face the fact that he ought to return home. All of those crimes, favours called in, and risks, just for a few hours of interaction--from a reader's perspective, entirely unsatisfying. And it makes Archer look like a complete buffoon in the process, from his senior officers conspiring against him and absconding without him even realizing it until something like a day later, so his receiving his wayward officers with hugs and kisses--not even a slap on the wrist for their deceit and dereliction of duty.

Star Trek is, admitedly, action/adventure; I neither expect nor ask for strict realism, and those kinds of close shaves are a staple of genre. And there are some characters for which a tendency towards blind luck is an endearing characteristic, à la Han Solo. But it doesn't work for a bumbling, juvenile character like Tucker, and the suspension of disbelief that his misadventures demand goes too far beyond the bounds of what can reasonably be expected for the genre--something well demonstrated by his climatic scene. At this point, I'm looking at any chapter that involves Tucker with a rather jaundiced perspective, it's true; but I feel like dashing my head against a wall when Sopek rescues him for no apparent reason, then, on demonstrating his ill-intentions towards Enterprise and the Coalition, decides that Tucker is perfectly fine on the bridge of his starship--rather than a brig, or even a non-critical area like a cargo bay--not standing off to the side, where he could do nothing but watch, but rather sitting at a console--not a console that's been disabled, but one that's active because it's non-essential and surely a proficient engineer couldn't do any harm from there--and who has a guard, not standing next to him but clear across the bridge where he can't see what Tucker is doing (or else thinks it's fine for Tucker to be looking over the ship's systems in the middle of a crisis) and too far away to stop him with any expediency. It's absolutely mind-numbing. We're supposed to believe that Sopek is playing a three-way spy game between the V'Shar, Valdore and the terrorist cell, but apparently he doesn't have two neurons to rub against each other. Of course, Tucker manages to use his console to get a message out to the Enterprise, and on being discovered, then manages to leap across a bridge full of armed Romulans, pusher the navigator aside, steer the warbird into a nearby asteroid before anybody can stop him or reverse what he's done, not only survives the crash but wakes up before anybody else, allowing him to shoot his way off the ship and into an escape pod while carrying Sopek's unconscious form. When the fuck did 'Trip' Tucker become Jack Bauer, precisely? I hope--though I know it'll never be the case--that the gravimetric mine towards which he is spiralling will be the death of him, because honestly I don't think I can take another episode of super agent Tucker.

I can't help but think, in 'that' discussion we've been having lately, of the complaint about a living/dead character's potential continued participation in the book line requiring contrived scenarios. Hello! What's this tripe if not contrived? Meanwhile, in order to make room for the continued adventures of Tucker, superstar, the rest of the cast other than Archer winds up taking a backseat. T'Pol and Reed are in the book only to the extent that they serve to facilitate the Tucker storyline; Phlox has a few good scenes, but is largely secondary; and Mayweather and Sato are practically non-entities, with only a few bones thrown their way. Part of the two latter characters' lack of involvement must be the fact that they are outside the conspiracy that has essentially hijacked the post-series ENT line.

As a final bit of criticism, I would also mention that there are a few scenes in the book that seem to go nowhere. V'Shar T'Pol vs. the mutants, although ironically the most thrilling sequence in the book, never gets any follow-up. Then there's Mayweather's esrtwhile girlfriend, who pops up for a pointless scene just to get outscooped later on in the book. Perhaps this are meant to be plot points that will get pick up on later books--Mayweather, in particular, demands more development given what happened to his family--but as they stand, they're empty diversions in a book already of considerable length. I do hope those mutants get brought up again, because I found that sequence interesting, but I don't think I'll be around to find out.

Why? Because, ultimately, looking towards the Romulan War, I don't think I'll be picking it up. Part of the reason is that I find the move towards trade paperbacks even for regular novels damnably mercenary and not really something I want to support, but mostly because I don't think the ENT Relaunch books so far justify the expense. KM was better than TGTMD, but is unfortunately afflicted by the same absurdities of plot and favouritism in characters, and if that's how future novels are going to be, then I see no reason to persist in the hopes of some kind of improvement.

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
 
While I did enjoy the book more than you, I do have to agree about the stuff with T'Pol and Reed rescuing Trip. I've still not seen most of seasons 2 and 3, but all of that stuff just really didn't seem to work. Especially the quickie and Archer's reaction to T'Pol and Reed coming back, those two parts really just didn't seem to fit the show and the characters. That part was really the only specific problem I had with the book. Now it wasn't anywhere near as good as Destiny or Vanguard or any of that stuff, but I still thought it was enjoyable.
 
I'm with Trent on pretty much everything, though I'll buy and read The Romulan War. I'm just keeping my expectations low.

I have to admit, I'm not crazy about the focus of the Enterprise relaunch being on Trip and the Romulans. I suppose the books have to deal with the Romulans eventually, but it'd be nice to get some more standalone novels that give all the crew something to do. Maybe even do a book wrapping up the Temporal Cold War business and explaining who Future Guy was supposed to be. And bring in some other writers, for a bit of variety.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top