So who would it be?
Statistically, Charles Davis analysed the statistics for several prominent sportsmen by comparing the number of standard deviations that they stand above the mean for their sport. And it found that the late Sir Donald Bradman, was better than Pele, Ty Cobb, Jack Nicklaus and Michael Jordan.
So was anyone better than the late Sir Donald Bradman, who scored 29 centuries in only 80 innings. Only seven other players have score more centuries and most of them are modern players, and have player over 150 innings each. Bradman played the game during the 1930's. He ended up with a batting average of 99.94 (which is considered to be greatest achievement in any major sport). According to the statistics, a basketball player would need to average 43 points per game, and a baseball player would need to have an batting average of 0.392
So is there anyone in sports history could be said to be better than Bradman?
Statistically, Charles Davis analysed the statistics for several prominent sportsmen by comparing the number of standard deviations that they stand above the mean for their sport. And it found that the late Sir Donald Bradman, was better than Pele, Ty Cobb, Jack Nicklaus and Michael Jordan.
So was anyone better than the late Sir Donald Bradman, who scored 29 centuries in only 80 innings. Only seven other players have score more centuries and most of them are modern players, and have player over 150 innings each. Bradman played the game during the 1930's. He ended up with a batting average of 99.94 (which is considered to be greatest achievement in any major sport). According to the statistics, a basketball player would need to average 43 points per game, and a baseball player would need to have an batting average of 0.392
So is there anyone in sports history could be said to be better than Bradman?