• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Starfleet Academy General Discussion Thread

Did you actually read the articles? Because it did happen. I remember it well.

There was also the whining during season one that the one white cisgender male was the baddie.

Let’s please not try to ignore history or sweep it under the rug.

No it was their excuse for people not liking the show. If people didnt like the show they were racist. Burnham was a badly written character and it had nothing to do with her race or gender. The show was badly designed and written. It did not seem like a prequel to tos at all. The klingons looked like a new alien race. Thats the real issues people had with the show. But the studio cried racism instead.
 
No it was their excuse for people not liking the show. If people didnt like the show they were racist. Burnham was a badly written character and it had nothing to do with her race or gender. The show was badly designed and written. It did not seem like a prequel to tos at all. The klingons looked like a new alien race. Thats the real issues people had with the show. But the studio cried racism instead.
Complete nonsense. You have it totally backwards: Racist, sexist, homophobic and transphobic comments were called out for what they were. And those people making those comments liked to hide their bigotry behind “simply voicing criticism”. We were all there, so we really don’t need you to tell us what we experienced here.
 
Complete nonsense. You have it totally backwards: Racist, sexist, homophobic and transphobic comments were called out for what they were. And those people making those comments liked to hide their bigotry behind “simply voicing criticism”. We were all there, so we really don’t need you to tell us what we experienced here.
So anyone who has valid criticisms of lets say SFA like the 21st century slang and vernacular, the bad soap opera writing, things barely changing in 900 years etc. Those criticisms are to hide bigotry? Is that what your saying? Ive never once complained about sexuality or race in star trek. I couldn't care less. Its all about story and it making sense. You guys bring this stuff up to justify some imagined huge war with other fans. Its ridiculous. Modern star trek isn't at the quality of TOS or Berman Trek except maybe SNW and Picard season 3.

Im not saying there arent these types of fans out there but it certainly isnt most and it certainly isn't everyone who has valid criticisms of these newer shows. The criticisms that would never have happened if they didnt start these shows pre tos.
 
Last edited:
Tron, you and I have gone round and round in regards to whether the minutiae that you mention is worthy of criticism. I don’t want to get into that again. But I’m going to make a friendly suggestion that you drop this. You are incorrect. You are ignoring the considerable amount of criticism from other parties that has been more charged towards minorities regarding modern era Star Trek. That might not be you. But others have. Let it go.
 
As I've said before, it seems pretty clear if you look across multiple franchises that the bad reactions of fandom are more rooted in sexism (and homophobia) than racism.

Where recent franchise movies and TV shows have centered men of color (provided they're straight) backlash is pretty damn minimal. Everyone still loves T'Challa. Everyone still loves Miles Morales. No one had any issue with Finn in the Star Wars Sequels, other than him not being given anything to do past the first movie.

OTOH, every outing that has had a "fandom backlash" has focused on the female characters. Rey. Galadriel. She-Hulk. The list goes on and on.

I'd even say SFA fits this general mold. Caleb is the nominal lead among the young cast, and as a traditionally masculine guy of indeterminate ethnicity, he's gotten zero blowback, with the "fandom" folks focusing the most on SAM.
 
And sometimes the criticisms, against Discovery in particular, are so overwrought and performative that it becomes very hard to take them seriously. I mean, if you want to express something like that as your opinion, that is your right. However the rest of us have the right to roll our eyes and say, "oh this s*** again." Some of y'all need to take Tilly's drama class.
 
Last edited:
So anyone who has valid criticisms of lets say SFA like the 21st century slang and vernacular, the bad soap opera writing, things barely changing in 900 years etc. Those criticisms are to hide bigotry? Is that what your saying?
No, that’s not what I’m saying. Like at all. All of those are of course completely fine, and I would have thought by now you would know that I actually understand my job as a moderator here as making sure negative criticisms as these can be voiced. Heck, if you go through some of the individual things I said about the show and the episodes, you’ll find plenty of negative criticism. I have something to complain about in almost every episode. :lol:

I wasn’t even aware we were suddenly talking about you, because genuinely, I wasn’t. I’m talking about people who said bigoted things about this show or one of the previous shows. Something racist, sexist, homophobic … what have you. These kind of people usually act like the bigoted things they say about these shows are “just valid criticism”. For example, saying something like: “There’s too many women in leadership positions on the show. I have nothing against women and I just want the show to succeed, but I think this show would be better with strong men as leaders.“ This is a misogynistic comment disguised as just voicing a criticism of the show.

I genuinely think you are wrong about your estimation of how many bigoted viewers and fans of Star Trek there are and whether they present a problem or not. But putting that discussion to the side, does the rest of what I said make sense to you? Do you now understand what I meant? :)
 
No, that’s not what I’m saying. Like at all. All of those are of course completely fine, and I would have thought by now you would know that I actually understand my job as a moderator here as making sure negative criticisms as these can be voiced. Heck, if you go through some of the individual things I said about the show and the episodes, you’ll find plenty of negative criticism. I have something to complain about in almost every episode. :lol:

I wasn’t even aware we were suddenly talking about you, because genuinely, I wasn’t. I’m talking about people who said bigoted things about this show or one of the previous shows. Something racist, sexist, homophobic … what have you. These kind of people usually act like the bigoted things they say about these shows are “just valid criticism”. For example, saying something like: “There’s too many women in leadership positions on the show. I have nothing against women and I just want the show to succeed, but I think this show would be better with strong men as leaders.“ This is a misogynistic comment disguised as just voicing a criticism of the show.

I genuinely think you are wrong about your estimation of how many bigoted viewers and fans of Star Trek there are and whether they present a problem or not. But putting that discussion to the side, does the rest of what I said make sense to you? Do you now understand what I meant? :)

I get what youre saying now. 🙂When it comes to star trek ive never liked the fandom fighting to try and bring eachother down. I thing its the advent of youtube which is causing this. There are vocal fans on youtube warring with each other and accusing each side. I never thought star trek would bring out this kind of hate. But I think and hope the larger group of us fans aren't or wouldn't fall for any of this stuff. Sometimes I really miss the old days of star trek conventions and fans all excited about star trek and arguing about fun things like tech or story inconsistencies. Basically nerd stuff.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes I really miss the old days of star trek conventions and fans all excited about star trek and arguing about fun things like tech or story inconsistencies. Basically nerd stuff.
You said something similar the other day that let me think you weren’t doing conventions anymore. As someone who just started visiting conventions within the last 15 years or so, I can only implore you to attend one again, because they still are super fun and it’s always interesting meeting and talking to other fans, being awkward together, celebrating Trek. :)
 
The prequels? That backlash was well before modern social media, and it was focus on the actual movies being bad, rather than criticism of the characters.
Hahaha.


It was as much about Anakin being a whiny brat and bad at love and how stupid Mace and Yoda were.

The characters took a beating too.
 
Hahaha.


It was as much about Anakin being a whiny brat and bad at love and how stupid Mace and Yoda were.

The characters took a beating too.

I saw all the prequels in the theatre - and hated them, TBH.

What I remember about the "discourse" was:
  • Jar-Jar sucks
  • Several of the characters in TFM came across as racial stereotypes
  • The dialogue was terrible and wooden ("I hate sand")
  • Hayden Christensen did an awful job as Anakin
  • The direction was pretty bad as well (lots of characters walking down corridors)
 
I saw all the prequels in the theatre - and hated them, TBH.

What I remember about the "discourse" was:
  • Jar-Jar sucks
  • Several of the characters in TFM came across as racial stereotypes
  • The dialogue was terrible and wooden ("I hate sand")
  • Hayden Christensen did an awful job as Anakin
  • The direction was pretty bad as well (lots of characters walking down corridors)
Yup

I heard all from my Star Wars fan club how awful Anakin was, would never be believable as Vader, the "No" was mocked relentlessly.

I heard the other stuff but the characters were routinely beaten down on, i.e. stupid, blind, idiotic, unbelievable, and worse.
 
Yup

I heard all from my Star Wars fan club how awful Anakin was, would never be believable as Vader, the "No" was mocked relentlessly.

I heard the other stuff but the characters were routinely beaten down on, i.e. stupid, blind, idiotic, unbelievable, and worse.

I don't think you can argue people were criticizing the characters (other than Jar-Jar) though. Everyone had awful dialogue. The problem was with the script, not with the character conception. The problem is while Lucas is a good producer and "concept guy" he's just bad at writing dialogue (and direction, for that matter).
 
I don't think you can argue people were criticizing the characters (other than Jar-Jar) though. Everyone had awful dialogue. The problem was with the script, not with the character conception. The problem is while Lucas is a good producer and "concept guy" he's just bad at writing dialogue (and direction, for that matter).
I saw criticism all about the characters. Yes, the dialogue was one aspect but the other one was simply how poorly the characters were. Anakin was considered laughable, not believable as a character, not just because of dialogue but his very odd emoting.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top