What artists were those? Where have they been open about it? Just curious, since this is the first I’ve heard of this.
Paramount+ 60th Anniversary Intro
- Thread starter Tallguy
- Start date
What artists were those? Where have they been open about it? Just curious, since this is the first I’ve heard of this.
You made the claim, so yes it is. Provide links to the posts where those artists have said this.
They certainly haven't here. As it is, you're the one making the claim on this site, so the burden of proof is on you.
Also, as long as we're nitpicking, the Enterprise-A's warp nacelles should be blue since it is flying at warp speed.
Could you elaborate?
I have been wondering where some of the models that were used for the PIC season 3 fleet museum scenes came from. Were any of those used for this logo as well?
It's a 30 seconds clip. It takes around the same time to read the first post as to watch the whole thing.Can we rename this thread “The Nitpicker’s Guide to the Star Trek 60th Anniversary Logo?”
Mods?
Every discussion that is longer than "I like it" is going to be nitpicky.
And this is what I love this site for.
The Trek CG Fan Art community isn't that big, especially narrowing it down to people who put up good-quality models for downloads. I can rule out Chris Kuhn, since he explicitly releases all his fan-art as "CC0," no restrictions on use whatsoever, but that still leaves at least three people I can name off the top of my head, and I'm not familiar enough with the quirks of their specific models to be able to identify them on-sight.
The intro likely is meant for Star Trek's 60th in general, not just SA.
Humor. It’s a difficult concept.
Can you please use SFA. 'SA' has some negative connotations.
I liked it! It made me smile. 
And they are? Where do they make this claim? This is more than likely on the same level as the game maker who sued Discovery because they used blue uniforms and tardigrades.
Funny you should mention. Separating modern era Trek and legacy Trek doesn’t work for me; doing that’s wanting to pretend they’re separate things. They’re not.
Oh. THAT would have been AMAZING.
That's one exclusion I approve of.
Then perhaps you could provide a link to where these artists are voicing their complaints on this matter? Or is that also not your responsibility?
Paramount may be many things, but they are not legally stupid. There is no way, IMHO, that they are just going to steal someone else's intellectual property and use it without consent. Not only would that open them to lawsuits, but it would also set quite the precedent the next time they wanted to sue someone else for using their Star Trek IP. I just don't believe that happened in this case.
