• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers STAR TREK: SECTION 31 - Grading & Discussion

Rate the movie...

  • 10 - Excellent!

    Votes: 4 1.7%
  • 9

    Votes: 6 2.5%
  • 8

    Votes: 11 4.7%
  • 7

    Votes: 20 8.5%
  • 6

    Votes: 31 13.1%
  • 5

    Votes: 36 15.3%
  • 4

    Votes: 16 6.8%
  • 3

    Votes: 26 11.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 27 11.4%
  • 1 - Terrible!

    Votes: 59 25.0%

  • Total voters
    236
Generic is the lazy word I see thrown around today. Substitute: it doesn't look like Starfleet or starships so it's not what I wanted it to look like.

It's not generic because the scenery isn't what you expect. It is deliberately not those things. Variety is the spice of life as they say.

The movie isn’t getting bad reviews because there are no starships in it. It’s getting bad reviews because it is a bad movie.
 
So, it wasn’t great but…I didn’t actually think it was all that bad. It was a piece of reasonably entertaining fluff, livened by the fact I love Michelle Yeoh in anything.

It would definitely have benefited from the mini-series treatment, maybe three or four episodes to flesh things out. It felt highly compressed and nothing had space to breathe. Too many characters for such a limited runtime perhaps. I didn’t like the directing, but alas O.O. always seems to overdirect and rely on gimmickry.

But I’m not sure why the reviews are so brutal. The worst I can say is it feels rather generic and is overstuffed. I actually found the characters quite fun on the whole and wouldn’t have minded spending a little more time with them.

Not one I can see myself rewatching, but then I never have much desire to rewatch nuTrek. I’m gonna buck the trend and say it was…okay.
 
Generic is the lazy word I see thrown around today. Substitute: it doesn't look like Starfleet or starships so it's not what I wanted it to look like.

It's not generic because the scenery isn't what you expect. It is deliberately not those things. Variety is the spice of life as they say.
Generic as in, the designs of ships, sets and outfits could have fitted into any other franchise or been an original IP without any changes at all.
 
The more I think about it, I feel bad for Bo Yeon Kim and Erika Lippoldt.

They left Discovery to write, create, and run the original iteration of Section 31, only for the pandemic to shitcan the series after nearly completing the scripts for season 1 and gotten started on developing future seasons. And then to see their creation be turned into this shallow and boring creature? Eeeesh. I know the industry has done this and worse to other writers, but it sucks all the same.
 
I watched the movie without subtitles, I will watch it again tomorrow with subtitles, but I have to say this: The movie was terrible and people are saying Alex Kurtzman should go. I really want to ask: are there any good old-school Star Trek writers left in Hollywood? I don't think there are any. There is only one good old-school Star Trek writer: Ronald D. Moore, who has worked on DSP9 and TNG productions in the past and was a writer for 2 TNG movies. He later worked on the 2004 version of Battlestar Galactica. He also made For All Mankind for Apple TV Plus for Sony. He also works on the God of War TV show for Amazon for Sony. He also can't make Star Trek. Who's left? Nobody. The guys who will go to Paramount: Maximum J.J. Abrams and Simon Kinberg. They wouldn't go with anyone else.

The man you mentioned is 60 years old, and if Paramount wanted to bring in someone other than Alex Kurtzman to lead Star Trek, they would want to bring in someone who has a good or bad reputation.
This seems like a massive over reaction, I can't imagine they're going to get rid of Kurtzman just because this isn't getting great reviews. I've been under the impression that everything else that's come out since during his time in charge has been at least relatively successful, I mean they keep ordering more shows, so they obviously must be pretty happy with how things have been performing so far.
 
- Anyone from TOS or the first seven movies who are still alive could appear in a follow-up should there be one. They wouldn’t need to be recast or need aging make-up.

Apart from Valeris, Saavik and maybe some kids from And the Children Shall Lead, I don't think anyone involved with TOS is up for more than a cameo.

Star Trek designed for people who don't like Star Trek.

So like a JJ Abrams film.
 
Alok says he 'slept' for most of the last 350 years. Did the augments launch another sleeper ship besides the Botany Bay?

Also this movie says the Eugenics Wars are in the 20th century again lmao.
It didn't actually say the wars were in the 20th century, just that Alok was born then. Assuming the wars took place at earliest in 2232 (enough time for kid Khan from SNW to be a young adult/late teen and take over the world) Alok would be 33 if he were born in 1999. Assuming in the new timeline Khan left in 2236, Alok would be 37 if he was asleep with Khan's people and woke up in 2267 in Space Seed and stranded the same year.

By 2285 Alok would be 55, maybe split with Khan's group offscreen and got rescued by Starfleet after ST2 with the rest of the Reliant crew. 39 years later in 2324 when S31 takes place, he would be 94, but looks younger because he's an Augment. :shrug:
 
Alok says he 'slept' for most of the last 350 years. Did the augments launch another sleeper ship besides the Botany Bay?

Also this movie says the Eugenics Wars are in the 20th century again lmao.

Well it's supposed to be in the 20th century .. 😂....

I guess that is one thing the movie got right considering all the bad reviews. I'm scared to watch it now .. 😂
 
Madred: What are the Federation's defence plans for Minos Korva?

Picard: There are FOUR LIGHTS!!!

Madred: Ok, no more Mister Nice Cardassian. Show Picard the Section 31 documentary!

Picard: No! Anything but that! NOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Garak: I thought I was a hardened torturer but even I would never... :weep:

Picard: AAARRGGHHHH!!!!! :wah:

Madred: Now Picard why don't we have you rewatch the scenes about--

Picard: Minos Korva has a shield modulation of 257.6. They're protected by an old style Xindi superweapon that can be deactivated with the code Archer four eight beta five. The largest cities for orbital bombardment are on the northwest corner of the southern continent. And yes, your room had FIVE LIGHTS! Turn the video off, please!!!!

Madred: :lol:
 
It put in me in mind of those more recent Bruce Willis films. You've got your big name, and the rest of it just rides the coat tails.
That’s probably part of the reason I didn’t mind it so much. Emperor Georgiou becoming a regular was the worst idea anyone ever had for Star Trek, so minimizing her role endeared me to S31 considerably. If only they swapped it out so the boring leader guy died to prove the situation was serious and the Deltan lady lived.
 
Memory Alpha says the events of the movie take place in 2324, twenty years before Garrett's death aboard the Enterprise-C. Take that for what you will. The movie sure didn't bother to tell us a precise time frame.
 
Memory Alpha says the events of the movie take place in 2324, twenty years before Garrett's death aboard the Enterprise-C. Take that for what you will. The movie sure didn't bother to tell us a precise time frame.
She had a long time in service as a captain once she proved her mettle.
 
I watched the movie without subtitles, I will watch it again tomorrow with subtitles, but I have to say this: The movie was terrible and people are saying Alex Kurtzman should go. I really want to ask: are there any good old-school Star Trek writers left in Hollywood? I don't think there are any. There is only one good old-school Star Trek writer: Ronald D. Moore, who has worked on DSP9 and TNG productions in the past and was a writer for 2 TNG movies. He later worked on the 2004 version of Battlestar Galactica. He also made For All Mankind for Apple TV Plus for Sony. He also works on the God of War TV show for Amazon for Sony. He also can't make Star Trek. Who's left? Nobody. The guys who will go to Paramount: Maximum J.J. Abrams and Simon Kinberg. They wouldn't go with anyone else.
Alex Kurtzman isn't going anywhere despite what "people" say. And I'm fine with that.
 
Memory Alpha says the events of the movie take place in 2324, twenty years before Garrett's death aboard the Enterprise-C. Take that for what you will. The movie sure didn't bother to tell us a precise time frame.
Apparently whoever wrote that just entered the stardate given into the first webpage google result for stardate calculator and got 2324 returned (I tried it and I got April 17, 2324). To my knowledge the Earth year is never given in the movie, and there are no official "stardate calculators" so this dating is entirely based off of entering the stardate into a fan stardate calculator, which the Memory Alpha entry writer must have used.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top