There's no contradiction here. Not even close. So....
Vulcans are not known for their openness. It's shocking how much the Federation database lacked about a founding species. Vulcan inner eyelid? Nope, not in the medical records. Pon Farr? Not in the medical records. McCoy was always stumped by Spock's "Vulcan" physiology. Rarely was it because Spock was a unique hybrid.
Katras? Doesn't appear to be common knowledge. Spock being related to T'pau? Spock's dad being an ambassador and major player in Federation politics? Apparently none of this is worth noting in Spock personnel file or even on a simple Google search.
So, yeah, it's believable Vulcan high command or whatever it's called would know the truth about the Romulans and keep it secret. T'pol knew how to correct Hoshi's pronunciation of Romulan. She knew more than the Enterprise crew.
Vulcans are not known for their openness. It's shocking how much the Federation database lacked about a founding species. Vulcan inner eyelid? Nope, not in the medical records. Pon Farr? Not in the medical records. McCoy was always stumped by Spock's "Vulcan" physiology. Rarely was it because Spock was a unique hybrid.
Katras? Doesn't appear to be common knowledge. Spock being related to T'pau? Spock's dad being an ambassador and major player in Federation politics? Apparently none of this is worth noting in Spock personnel file or even on a simple Google search.
That might have had something to do with an abandoned plot line where it turned out that T'Pol was half-Romulan.
We have no knowledge, one way or another.Was Spock the first hybrid, after T'Pol and Trip's baby died?
Was Spock the first hybrid, after T'Pol and Trip's baby died?
This was in the two episodes "Terra Prime" and "Demons."Was this an actual, screen-used baby in Star Trek: Enterprise, or a yarn added later by some recent, ostensible "Star Trek" show, or a baby that was written in a novel? I need to know how thoroughly I should disregard the tragedy.
This was in the two episodes "Terra Prime" and "Demons."
My understanding is that he was the first hybrid to survive and grow to adulthood. This is according to the interview between Roddenberry and Sarek Here is the transcript: http://www.selek.ca/pat_w/Sarek_Roddenberry_interview.htm and the interview itself: https://redshirtsalwaysdie.com/2021/05/24/gene-roddenberry-interviews-spocks-father-sarek/
The Original Series is not responsible for spin-off yarns creating contradictions. When the spin-offs contradict TOS, I would say either the spin-off is apocryphal, or it takes place in an alternate timeline/continuity.
You can't reconcile every Superman movie and TV series, and they're honest about it. The difference is that modern Trek wants it both ways: they do anything they please, whatsoever, and still claim that it's all in one continuity with TOS.
In my view, TNG, DS9, and VOY did a very good job of abiding history, but ENT was a prequel that wanted all the freedom and latitude of a "future" story where anything can happen. And after ENT, the franchise didn't get more honest, it got less.
Is it fan fiction if it's a conversation between the creator of the series (Roddenberry himself) and one of his characters?Fan fiction doesn’t count as evidence.
Since it was never turned into a show and broadcast, I would tend to put it in the same category as other behind the scenes materials written by the creators, such as the series bible - information which comes from an authoritative source and gives information on what might have been, but nonetheless remains unofficial until incorporated into an actual episode.Is it fan fiction if it's a conversation between the creator of the series (Roddenberry himself) and one of his characters?
Is it fan fiction if it's a conversation between the creator of the series (Roddenberry himself) and one of his characters?
Since it was never turned into a show and broadcast, I would tend to put it in the same category as other behind the scenes materials written by the creators, such as the series bible - information which comes from an authoritative source and gives information on what might have been, but nonetheless remains unofficial until incorporated into an actual episode.
If it never makes it to the small or large screen as an official studio production, it's apocryphal information that has no bearing on canon, period. Any thought experiments/embellishments are head canon. Commit any of it to writing and it's fan fiction. Sell that writing as a book or comic book, and it's still not canon. (Yes, I know there are official tie-in works, but it's marketing and merchandise rubbish that never has appreciable impact on canon anyway.)I understand your point of view, though I do not agree with it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.