The only two times I've ever been on the ground between the Mississippi River and the West Coast states were airport layovers when I flew out to Los Angeles and back to pitch to Deep Space Nine in the '90s. I think they were in Phoenix.
A very confused episode which underlines the behind the scenes struggles between Fontana and Roddenberry and whether TNG's opening episode should be a 1 hour or a 2 hour show.
Not the strongest series opener and had I seen this in 1987 I would seriously reconsider watching the show. It has potential though, and that's a throughline to keep me going.
The special effects were poor I thought, surprising considering ILM did them.
I agree, John De Lancie as Q certainly steals the show and proves to be an excellent foe for Picard and the gang to go up against, and has great chemistry with Stewart. Its a shame that his presence in this story is to serve as a literal road block to stop the Enterprise from getting to Farpoint to quickly. As Christopher comments, his function is to pop in occasionally, spook the crew and be proven wrong at the end of the show. As Picard later comments in "Hide And Q", he's just a flim flam man, but we know he becomes more. Eventually.I did see it in 1987. And I had that reaction. I was underwhelmed to say the least. I did like John De Lancie as Q. That was probably the high point. Though I agree, that angle of the episode seemed like an add on to make the episode longer. I thought to myself I'm not sure this is going to last. I was still trying to get used to the idea of a Star Trek without Kirk, Spock, McCoy and company. And it's funny to think now but I hated the Enterprise-D when I first saw it. The special effects were poor I thought, surprising considering ILM did them. I always hated the 'roaming starfield' in the background that they used in the first 2 seasons. Who's stupid idea was that? The Blu-Ray cleaned up the special effects a bit, as best they could. I kind of wished at least for the first 2 seasons that they redid them like they did for the remastered original series.
But the stories did improve and even by the end of the first season I started seeing more potential in the show. The special effects would eventually improve, the actors settled into their roles, the stories got better and I came to love TNG and found it to be a worthy successor to Star Trek. And I even came to love the ship and I was sad to see it destroyed in Generations.
Granted, I'm not British, but I was under the impression TNG didn't begin airing un Britain until after Doctor Who was taken off the air in 1989. It always gets brought up in the old "Star Trek and Doctor Who can never co-exist" thing outlining how Star Trek and Doctor Who never air/release new content at the same time, which actually was true up until 2020.the effects seen in TNG and other American imports were continually used to beat Doctor Who over the head with by the Press and the heads at the BBC and was a factor in its cancellation in 1989.
They weren't as good as feature-film effects, but compared to other contemporary TV shows, they were exceptionally good.
As for the visual effects, I've always been rather impressed with them on early TNG.
I agree, John De Lancie as Q certainly steals the show and proves to be an excellent foe for Picard and the gang to go up against, and has great chemistry with Stewart.
Hmm, that's a point, I believe TNG began airing in 1990. I know that TNG and other American programs were referenced by Michael Grade and other higher-ups by the BBC, but that was in interviews recorded after the fact. The memory cheats, I guess, then again, I suppose they may have been at least aware of it when looking at imports for the coming years.Granted, I'm not British, but I was under the impression TNG didn't begin airing un Britain until after Doctor Who was taken off the air in 1989. It always gets brought up in the old "Star Trek and Doctor Who can never co-exist" thing outlining how Star Trek and Doctor Who never air/release new content at the same time, which actually was true up until 2020.
Many have mentioned the fact that we don't know the TNG characters well enough to see them acting out of character
Thanks Christopher, you've made me see the episode in a slightly different light. We both agreed that the execution wasn't perfect, but it did highlight that Picard and Crusher were deeply attracted to each other; Wesley who was sick of being ignored and forbidden from the bridge; Yar's desire to be more feminine at outgoing; Geordi's desire to have "normal" sight; and touches on Data's potential to be more human and enjoy normal human interaction.That's missing the point of the virus, though. It doesn't make them act out of character; it reveals the parts of their characters that they normally keep hidden, by taking away their inhibitions. It's along the lines of the old saying that you don't really know someone until you see them drunk. "The Naked Time" revealed so much we take for granted about the TOS characters -- Kirk's loneliness in command, Spock's struggle to control his emotions, Chapel's crush on Spock. That's not out of character, that is their character. And that's the reason they did "The Naked Now" so early in TNG -- to establish the characters' personalities and desires and drives so we could get to know them better.
Though I agree that it could've done a better job of establishing interesting character traits. But Roddenberry was eager to take advantage of the lessening of censorship since the '60s, so he wanted a story geared more toward sexy antics.
Thanks Christopher, you've made me see the episode in a slightly different light. We both agreed that the execution wasn't perfect, but it did highlight that Picard and Crusher were deeply attracted to each other; Wesley who was sick of being ignored and forbidden from the bridge; Yar's desire to be more feminine at outgoing; Geordi's desire to have "normal" sight; and touches on Data's potential to be more human and enjoy normal human interaction.
Also, the strong female security chief wants to be more girly and seduce random male coworkers, and the guy with vastly superior artificial vision wants to trade it in to be "normal." Ugh.
P&C's attraction was a 7-year tease not resolved until Picard season 3, Geordi's VISOR was mostly downplayed in later seasons except as a means of compromising or torturing him, and the emotional capacity Data showed early on was retconned into nonexistence in season 3.
Data's characterization did change as the show went on, probably owing to new showrunners taking over and deciding to take his character in a new direction. Though I never totally bought the idea that he 'lacked' emotions. At times the show did hint that there was something more. Data cared about his friends. He showed affection towards his cat. I can't buy that he had no emotions. Different, yes. More subdued than it seemed early on? Yes, no doubt. But there was something more there, though the show didn't seem to quite resolve that either.
Reading this novel 25 years later having lived through the horrific Covid pandemic of 2020-2022, one can’t help but see how John Gregory Betancourt was quite prescient in his depiction of humanity’s reaction to a deadly plague. Whether it be the looting and violence, to the rise of racist political factions such as the Brotherhood who stage protests and coral young law enforcement officers and political officials to their ranks. Unknowingly, Betancourt created a snapshot of our world in the 2020s which I’d like to believe was some divine gift, but was probably very much down to Humanity, despite our veneer of respectability, still being barbaric in the face of adversity.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.