Picard was speaking French the whole time, in every episode.
So that's what, TNG?NOT as something Sacred and Holy.
Picard was speaking French the whole time, in every episode.
Also not something Sacred and Holy.So that's what, TNG?
I have seen the parallels top and find it amusing given the more secular appeal of Trek to some.I agree - not just about TOS but about Trek more in general, and despite some of my other posts and questions about 'canon' in other threads, I can't really use that term in a Trek context without experiencing some feeling of irony.
Though I think there are interesting parallels with religion. The 'splits' in fandom between different factions (nu-trek vs older forms of trek), the eternally returning questions (Is Starfleet Military?) people keep arguing about, the differences in attitude between 'traditionalists' and 'liberalists', the convoluted explanations some can come up with to reconcile several contradictory sounding script snippets with one another (Inerrancy of Scripture, sorry, I mean, scripts), and so on.
I'm only half serious about those parallels, but still, they are there.
Picard was speaking French the whole time, in every episode.
I wish! He was simply utterly unconvincing as a Frenchman. They should've made him British and been done with it. Now, if he'd been of French birth but for some reason raised in England by an English family, or even if his family had sent him to England to be educated, his adoption of English cultural mannerisms would've been more understandable. According to canon French is an archaic language in the 24th century so that his family spoke English at home, but that still doesn't explain his cultural Britishness.
My "denomination" is that I'm a Three Timeliner. I'm just not very vocal about it. This is why I didn't have a problem with DSC changing things up during first two seasons or SNW changing things up now. Some things I like better about the TOS version of the Mid-23rd Century, some things I like better about the Early-DSC and SNW version. Outside of the Mid-23rd Century, everything else is the same between those two versions, making the difference everywhere else no difference at all.Though I think there are interesting parallels with religion. The 'splits' in fandom between different factions (nu-trek vs older forms of trek), the eternally returning questions (Is Starfleet Military?) people keep arguing about, the differences in attitude between 'traditionalists' and 'liberalists', the convoluted explanations some can come up with to reconcile several contradictory sounding script snippets with one another (Inerrancy of Scripture, sorry, I mean, scripts), and so on.
Still doesn't explain his English accent. WW3 is 300 years before TNG. Just pretend Picard had a French accent, and pretend Uhura, La Forge and Worf did not sound like US citizensI could say that his personal settings on the Universal Translator were set to British, but in season 2 of Picard, Jean Luc said that the Picards left France for England during World War II and did not return until after World War III.
My "denomination" is that I'm a Three Timeliner.
I'm with you on the 3x Timelines being the most logical conlcusion:My "denomination" is that I'm a Three Timeliner. I'm just not very vocal about it. This is why I didn't have a problem with DSC changing things up during first two seasons or SNW changing things up now. Some things I like better about the TOS version of the Mid-23rd Century, some things I like better about the Early-DSC and SNW version. Outside of the Mid-23rd Century, everything else is the same between those two versions, making the difference everywhere else no difference at all.
Then there's the Kelvin Timeline which, according to Kovich in DSC Season 3, eventually became not just different but wildly different. The Butterfly Effect really spread out over there.
Everyone in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and France speaks English in the 24th Century. There are a few isolated villages were some French is spoken, mostly older people.I wish! He was simply utterly unconvincing as a Frenchman. They should've made him British and been done with it. Now, if he'd been of French birth but for some reason raised in England by an English family, or even if his family had sent him to England to be educated, his adoption of English cultural mannerisms would've been more understandable. According to canon French is an archaic language in the 24th century so that his family spoke English at home, but that still doesn't explain his cultural Britishness.
I'll have to agree to disagree. Data is way more impressive as an AI.I think three timelines works decently well in broad strokes, but ultimately in my view chasing down details to try to put together some sort of actually coherent set of timelines would result in more than three and is ultimately not worth the effort.
Anyways, controversial opinion = Data's really not that impressive as an AI. The positronic hardware is impressive and has medical uses, as seen in DS9 where Bashir uses positronic implants to compensate for brain damage - though I don't think we know if that technology comes from Soong's research or not. I think in chasing the goal of replicating humanity with this very human-like hardware ended up being a bit of a false start. The Doctor is much more impressive as an AI, and he runs on standard starship hardware.
I go with the view that it's all canon, it's all Star Trek, but it's not connected. They're different translations of the same source (e.g., King James Version, New International Version, New American Bible, etc.), where they all share the same basic characters, settings, and institutions, but the details can be slightly or very different because they're not the same text.My "denomination" is that I'm a Three Timeliner. I'm just not very vocal about it. This is why I didn't have a problem with DSC changing things up during first two seasons or SNW changing things up now. Some things I like better about the TOS version of the Mid-23rd Century, some things I like better about the Early-DSC and SNW version. Outside of the Mid-23rd Century, everything else is the same between those two versions, making the difference everywhere else no difference at all.
Then there's the Kelvin Timeline which, according to Kovich in DSC Season 3, eventually became not just different but wildly different. The Butterfly Effect really spread out over there.
Memory Alpha:Still doesn't explain his English accent. WW3 is 300 years before TNG. Just pretend Picard had a French accent, and pretend Uhura, La Forge and Worf did not sound like US citizens
What about Moriarty?The Doctor is much more impressive as an AI, and he runs on standard starship hardware.
Excellent on all counts. Why does any of that say "Gorn"?AKIVA GOLDSMAN: Because for me, storytelling beats canon. And that may not be popular, but it’s the truth. So when they can go hand-in-hand, great. But when I was writing the pilot, I was looking for something that was just monstrous, that was Cthulhu-like. Something that was unthinking.
Beautifully put.Part of the twist of “Arena” is realizing the whole mess is a misunderstanding. The Gorn aren’t “unthinking.” They are not monsters, savages, animals or facehuggers on LV-426. They’re people making bad choices in a misunderstanding over defending their home. Instead of not being able to identify with the Gorn, the entire episode is built around a future where humanity is able to find empathy for something alien, even giant lizard men that have killed a bunch of colonists, in order to recognize that maybe the entire situation is a giant mistake. Goldsman's use of the Gorn is the exact opposite intent of what Coon was getting at.
Anyways, controversial opinion = Data's really not that impressive as an AI. The positronic hardware is impressive and has medical uses, as seen in DS9 where Bashir uses positronic implants to compensate for brain damage - though I don't think we know if that technology comes from Soong's research or not. I think in chasing the goal of replicating humanity with this very human-like hardware ended up being a bit of a false start. The Doctor is much more impressive as an AI, and he runs on standard starship hardware.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.