• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Rod Roddenberry's Involvement

  • The actual Producer producer sees the film project through from development to release. If a name in the opening credits of a U.S. film has p.g.a. after the name that's the person recognized as the said producer by the Producers Guild of America.
  • The "line producer" is responsible for every line item in the budget.
  • TV routinely gives producer credits to writers. The p.g.a. does not like this.
  • Executive Producers usually brought something to the project (sometimes just lending their name to help get financing or whatever) but do typically do not do the work of an actual Producer.
 
He can hit greater heights than any of the rest of them (A Beautiful Mind) but also some very bad lows (Transformers, Batman & Robin,

I have a little more faith in Goldsman than many around here. I can't even call Transformers and Batman and Robin "bad" in the traditional sense. They are not smart movies, but they came out exactly as the filmmakers intended. It's not like they were trying to make "art" and it went wrong. Those are supposed to be lowest common denominator movies.
 
Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict both carried the Roddenberry name above the titles, and both lasted for over 100 episodes and were obviously direct competition for the Trek shows of that era.

So, yeah, they're leasing the name so Rod doesn't sell it to a rival space show.

I wanted to mention that I really enjoyed Trek Nation - Rod seemed very sincere. If any of our Dad's had created Trek, we would have thought it was corny when we were teens and would've tried to distance ourselves from it.

Can't imagine losing a parent at the age Rod was when Gene passed.
 
Last edited:
Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict both carried the Roddenberry name above the titles, and both lasted for over 100 episodes and were obviously direct competition for the Trek shows of that era.

They weren't meaningful competition. It's doubtful that they drew a single viewer away from Paramount's shows, which is what "competition" is about.
 
Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict both carried the Roddenberry name above the titles, and both lasted for over 100 episodes and were obviously direct competition for the Trek shows of that era.
Eh? The majority of their audiences were likely comprised of Trek fans.
 
True in a way. The name carries weight, lends credence to what is being made. Celebrity endorsement.
 
Shallow endorsements are meaningless to me. Shoes either succeed or fail on their own.

Otherwise, TMP, and TNG Season 1 would be the top rated bestest Trek ever and TWOK would be panned.
 
It's there to make us think nuTrek is good.
If you're going to go there, you should be going with Patrick Stewart and Jeri Ryan.

A Roddenberry Endorsement doesn't mean much. If you only go by what his father approved of, that knocks out TWOK, TSFS, TFF, TUC, "Family", "Redemption", and probably some other Mid-TNG episodes. To say nothing about what he would've thought of anything made after he died.
 
Last edited:
There may be a certain segment of fandom that sees some kind of value in having new Trek productions be 'in the family,' even if only nominally.

Kor
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top