That's what the window is for.Have you heard of 2nd hand smoke?
Last edited:
Spoilers The NCC-82893 Thread
- Thread starter F. King Daniel
- Start date
It’s the 24th century, they probably have healthy smokeHave you heard of 2nd hand smoke?
LOL apparently even the name of episode 1 is - "The Star Gazer"
Also Picard's original Stargazer commemorated...
As mentioned in another thread, 2326 seems far too late a date for the Stargazer to have been commissioned based on its registry number. It should have been constructed around the turn of the 24th century.
Well, the Excelsior was commissioned in 2285. That's 300 registry numbers above the Enterprise, which was commissioned in 2245. So, if we assume 300 / 40 years, then NCC-2600 would be commissioned sometime around 2325. So, it makes perfect sense.
Of course, this doesn't explain the 5-digit registries in the late 2300s, but hey, who really cares.
Last edited:
Stargazer was meant to be an OLD, beaten up ship. In Star Trek Beyond, U.S.S. Stargazer NCC-2893 is in service and arriving at Yorktown in 2260, name, number and arrival called out clearly over the tannoy when the Enterprise crew are disembarking.
I had to look up what a "tannoy" was. Nice.
which paris and nog did not know about
Agreed. In the Star Trek: Rihannsu novel Honor Blade, Stargazer entered service in 2276.
Building the ship in 2326 makes it younger than Picard himself.
Indeed, the Constellation-class USS Hathaway *NCC-2593* was already a 80-year old ship by 2365 (TNG "Peak Performance").
Yes clearly a running theme...
As the atrium gives way to the bridge he is the eponymous Star Gazer of the title.
Look up Jean-Luc, and let's see what's out there...
Last edited:
That would imply that Starfleet uses every single number chronologically for each ship they produce, and there's no evidence that's the case.
Plus, the dreadnought Entente NCC-2120 was in operation in TMP in the 2270's, at least a decade before the NCC-2000.
Also, as has already been mentioned, the Hathaway was commissioned in 2285.
Clearly someone didn't do their homework when making that Stargazer display.
Last edited:
I have to say that I strongly agree with his statements. So many treat the window as trite and I'm like "Why?" And the idea that I want to see it for myself, that I want to experience for myself, using my eyes, (cue Darth Vader scene) that makes it so valuable.
Well said, Doug.
I know exactly what my problem with viewscreen windows is: it's weird when they're on every ship during the Discovery era, then they're on no ships for the next hundred years, then they're back again! The Stargazer having a Discovery-style bridge window makes me roll my eyes a little, but I have zero issue with the Protostar bridge being all window, as it looks different to the Discovery-era windows and the ship's a prototype that's trying something new.
Though regular bridge windows have arguably always been a thing, depending on how literally you take the start of The Cage. The Enterprise-D definitely has a window in the ceiling.
Though regular bridge windows have arguably always been a thing, depending on how literally you take the start of The Cage. The Enterprise-D definitely has a window in the ceiling.
Since we can't read it all, what are the chances that those years are actually the time that Picard served on the ship (not just as Captain).
The word before the dates it seem to say 'Service', but yeah. We'll have to wait and see if we can read the whole top bar in the final episode, or any BTS pics.
I'm not sure why the display would make that distinction. It's about the ship, not about the people who served on her.
Similar threads
