• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Lower Decks 1x05 - "Cupid's Errant Arrow"

Rate the episode...

  • 10 - Lieutenant

    Votes: 17 13.7%
  • 9

    Votes: 38 30.6%
  • 8

    Votes: 34 27.4%
  • 7

    Votes: 13 10.5%
  • 6

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 5

    Votes: 6 4.8%
  • 4

    Votes: 3 2.4%
  • 3

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1 - Ensign

    Votes: 1 0.8%

  • Total voters
    124
as said.. Bradward needs something more to his personality, and not just a punching bag for Becky. Yes he's a stickler for rules, but he needs more.. character? He's kind of a walking cliche at the moment, even after 5 episodes
 
In the same post, you say that the supplemental material doesn't count and then talk about the premise established in the supplemental material. So...which is it?

If we don't care about the supplemental material, then it doesn't matter that the show doesn't live up to the premise established by the supplemental material. If we do, then it is just established fact that it is the worst ship in Starfleet even if that is still pretty good.

In terms of what has been shown in episodes, "Temporal Edict" established that the ship is pretty poorly managed. A ship that can turn into a wreck with acid pouring through floors and underarmed aliens able to invade after five days of micromanagement is not in good shape. In the latest episode, we are shown that plasma fires and smokiness is par for the course in addition to being told that the ship has some light-years on her and is being barely held together.

My point has always been the same. The idea that was "sold" to us via pre-release statements & press releases, etc., is that this is "the worst ship in the fleet" but that the show isn't actually showing that concept.

There's no contradiction at all.

I don't care at all that it doesn't jibe with pre-release hype, other than there was an adjustment period, as my expectations were different than what we were given based on how the show was sold. I had to reorient my thinking.

You've failed to alter your thinking and are instead clinging to extremely minor examples to support that original "worst ship" concept. Because there was one tiny fire while characters were making repairs? Because we're TOLD the ship is in rough shape, but don't actually see it? The show has failed to deliver on that concept basically at all.

Is the ship poorly managed? Also no. Yes, the captain is shown to be ambitious and a little petty, but most of the time, she's very competent, as she was in "Cupid's Arrow."

In "Temporal Edict", the captain overreaches and it leads to problems, but the vast majority of the time, the ship isn't falling into random chaos due to bad leadership or other issues. The senior staff is routinely shown with a baseline of competence with a few lightly silly quirks.

It's perfectly fine in the broadstrokes if the show doesn't want to be about "the worst ship in the fleet", provide it come up with other ways to be funny and/or interesting.

So far....uh, it hasn't.
 
Honestly, I would think the "worst ship in the fleet" would still be pretty solid and competent.

It's like the old joke of "what do you call someone who came in last in medical school? A doctor."

Yeah, but that guy still had to maintain a high GPA, pass all sorts of tests and be approved by qualified doctors in all of his residency training. So he may not be the greatest doctor but he still had to meet very high standards to get a license.

So, I'd say "the worst ship in the fleet" still has to have a crew it in it that passed and met all sorts of high standards. They may not be the Enterprise, but they've till got to be at some base standards.
 
Last edited:
I have a question. Not sure if it's been asked, didn't see it. I'm assuming that the Parliament-class ships will all be named for Canadian cities, but is it interesting that this isn't a Corps of Engineers ship? "Large complex engineering problems" says COE to me.
 
Probably has a detachment or five of SCE people on board separate from the regular ship's company...?
 
I didn't notice all the red in the Vancouver until the second viewing of the episode.
Though it's more of a burgundy colour.
 
My point has always been the same. The idea that was "sold" to us via pre-release statements & press releases, etc., is that this is "the worst ship in the fleet" but that the show isn't actually showing that concept.

There's no contradiction at all.

I don't care at all that it doesn't jibe with pre-release hype, other than there was an adjustment period, as my expectations were different than what we were given based on how the show was sold. I had to reorient my thinking.

You've failed to alter your thinking and are instead clinging to extremely minor examples to support that original "worst ship" concept. Because there was one tiny fire while characters were making repairs? Because we're TOLD the ship is in rough shape, but don't actually see it? The show has failed to deliver on that concept basically at all.

Is the ship poorly managed? Also no. Yes, the captain is shown to be ambitious and a little petty, but most of the time, she's very competent, as she was in "Cupid's Arrow."

In "Temporal Edict", the captain overreaches and it leads to problems, but the vast majority of the time, the ship isn't falling into random chaos due to bad leadership or other issues. The senior staff is routinely shown with a baseline of competence with a few lightly silly quirks.

It's perfectly fine in the broadstrokes if the show doesn't want to be about "the worst ship in the fleet", provide it come up with other ways to be funny and/or interesting.

So far....uh, it hasn't.

I don't really care what the promos say about the Cerritos.

I care about what is said and described on screen.

What has been shown on screen is that
  • there is so much wrong on the Cerritos that if one forces people to try to accomplish all their assignments precisely on a strict schedule things fall very much apart
  • A character with knowledge of the Cerritos describes it as having a lot of light-years on it, as smelling like toasted marshmallows and as barely holding together.
  • A couple of fires breaking out for no particular reason
Given that Starfleet is ubercompetent generally, to the extent it matters, the problems we have been shown or that have been described to us easily could make the Cerritos "the worst ship" in Starfleet.
 
So, I'd say "the worst ship in the fleet" still has to have a crew it in it that passed and met all sorts of high standards. They may not be the Enterorise, but they've till got to be at some base standards.
Perhaps, but perhaps they had to lax those standards as part of rebuilding from the whole war thing.

Or, instead of cashiering them out they took the Janeway approach and sought to retrain them to a job suitable to their talents. Unfortunately, Freeman resents her job so it became more of a mess than intended.
 
I don't really care what the promos say about the Cerritos.

I care about what is said and described on screen.

Good! Me neither! :)

What has been shown on screen is that
  • there is so much wrong on the Cerritos that if one forces people to try to accomplish all their assignments precisely on a strict schedule things fall very much apart

Actually, what was shown was that things on the Cerritos run so well that the junior officers have plenty of time to screw off and still get their work done on time. It's only when they're subjected to unnecessary pressure and aggressively unrealistic deadlines that things fall apart.

No where is it even suggested that there is "so much wrong" on the ship that doing assignments quickly causes problems. That idea doesn't even make any sense.

Literally the opposite is true - on a day to day level, everything is perfectly fine with plenty of downtime.

  • A character with knowledge of the Cerritos describes it as having a lot of light-years on it, as smelling like toasted marshmallows and as barely holding together.
Lots of ships have "a lot of lightyears on them." Saying that it's "Barely holding together" isn't the same as showing it. Thus far, the show hasn't shown it.

  • A couple of fires breaking out for no particular reason

And we're back to a tiny fire as the only true example in five episodes of the ship manifesting any kind of technical problems. And that was during a repair.

Hardly iron clad proof of anything.

Given that Starfleet is ubercompetent generally, to the extent it matters, the problems we have been shown or that have been described to us easily could make the Cerritos "the worst ship" in Starfleet.

There have been no problems that weren't caused by outside interference. You could say that the Enterprise was the "worst ship" because it got hit by a cosmic string, got captured by Ferengi privateers and because its officers "de-evolved" into monsters.

The show has failed to make the case that the Cerritos is anything other than a mid-level, workaday ship.
 
Last edited:
Once again I'm gonna say 8. I thoroughly enjoyed the episode. Loved Mariner's obsession. Loved the parasite reveal.
Loved the subplot with Tendi and Rutherford. And the stuff with he fish aliens was entertaining too.

Particularly enjoyed the reference to the Edo.
And the way they played with the cliches of the "jealous boyfriend" plot.
And unlike in DS9 were Kyra spent a whole, painful, episode trying to talk this one old guy to move from his moon...Freeman, upon finding out that the one fish guy and his wife were the only inhabitants of their moon, just told him to screw himself and went ahead with the plan.
Loved that.
 
Was Mariner's craziness over Boimler due to the Neural Parasite too?

Could be,but also it's very Mariner.

Seemed pretty clear it was because of the whole watching a friend get eaten by a shapeshifting alien.

And frankly going through things like that plus the issues with here mother probably explain why Mariner is the way she is. Well that and probably playing things up to look as unpromotable as possible.

I have a question. Not sure if it's been asked, didn't see it. I'm assuming that the Parliament-class ships will all be named for Canadian cities, but is it interesting that this isn't a Corps of Engineers ship? "Large complex engineering problems" says COE to me.

The Vancouver looked like it was being a stand in for a hero ship.

Actually, what was shown was that things on the Cerritos run so well that the junior officers have plenty of time to screw off and still get their work done on time. It's only when they're subjected to unnecessary pressure that things fall apart.

Plus it seemed like the problem was that command set time limits that didn't actually give them enough to do the work before they have to move to the next task.
 
Another aspect of this episode I loved was that every time we were following Boimler around, you could see, out of focus and in the background, Mariner diving through closing doors and skulking in the darkness as she investigated Barb. I found that to be quite amusing.
 
So, this parasite had been on Boimler for a long while and didn't show up once on the transporter biofilter? Nor did it show up on an annual physical? Or a haircut?

And shouldn't more women have been attracted to and come on to Boimler during this whole time? An unusual amount of of women? An out of the ordinary amount of women?
 
So, this parasite had been on Boimler for a long while and didn't show up once on the transporter biofilter? Nor did it show up on an annual physical? Or a haircut?
Probably got it just before he and Barb hooked up, which was a month (IIRC) prior to the episode.
Biofilters work at the need of plot.
 
Last edited:
  • there is so much wrong on the Cerritos that if one forces people to try to accomplish all their assignments precisely on a strict schedule things fall very much apart.

Also notably schedules made by people who actually have no idea how long tasks take.

So, this parasite had been on Boimler for a long while and didn't show up once on the transporter biofilter? Nor did it show up on an annual physical? Or a haircut?

The Biofilter is naff as we've seen with many-many previous examples.

And shouldn't more women have been attracted to and come on to Boimler during this whole time? An unusual amount of of women? An out of the ordinary amount of women?

Mariner: Yes, one did!

I personally buy that Barb wasn't attracted to Boimler because of it. I believe her when she says it was all about his personality.
 
https://twitter.com/gaghyogi49/status/1301933168790994945/photo/1
JvRvHYn.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top