• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers General Disco Chat Thread

I don't know. Losing yourself in a story is a one-shot deal, once you know what's gonna happen you can't look at it the same way. That's when you're happy if there are more things to discover. But you're right it's kinda like a study but that doesn't exclude fun. I had a lot of fun during my studies and my grades were rather high, one doesn't preclude the other.

To each his own but I think most of the general public aren't going to want to consume this show in that manner.
 
I don't know, call me old fashioned but I like to carried along by a story with real heart and strength to it that I can easily lose myself in - something Trek traditionally was. What you're describing sounds more like something academic you'd have to study. Where's the fun in that?

The fun comes from reading a book a second time and discovering there are all sorts of thing you didn't see that further enriches your experience and understanding and offers additional perspectives that takes the story to another level for you.
 
To each his own but I think most of the general public aren't going to want to consume this show in that manner.

Lots of people rewatch TV shows and reread books they like. Catching new things one missed the first time around is part of that experience. But this idea that Star Trek should do all your thinking for you, IMO, is what made much of the previous iterations juvenile SF, the sort of things that SF writers were doing in the 50's but swerved to writing for adults by the end of that decade. I'm happy that with Disco, were getting a bit beyond that.
 
The fun comes from reading a book a second time and discovering there are all sorts of thing you didn't see that further enriches your experience and understanding and offers additional perspectives that takes the story to another level for you.

There was actually an academic study which was done which suggests "spoiling" the end of a story actually improves enjoyment of it. The hypothesis is basically we can't pay attention to the "what/why" and the "how" at the same time. If we're reading or watching for plot, we're not paying close attention to the small details which are dropped in along the way foreshadowing the eventual conclusion.
 
There was actually an academic study which was done which suggests "spoiling" the end of a story actually improves enjoyment of it. The hypothesis is basically we can't pay attention to the "what/why" and the "how" at the same time. If we're reading or watching for plot, we're not paying close attention to the small details which are dropped in along the way foreshadowing the eventual conclusion.

That's one of the reasons I've long since stopped being bothered by spoilers, and, at times even seek them out.
 
It must be nearly impossible to make a movie or a series episode nowadays without every fundamental detail being known even before it's aired.
 
Season 2, at least the first five episodes, span much less time than I thought. In "An Obol for Charon", Linus said he had a cold "last week" and Tilly said it's the second time "this week" she feels like she was hit with a lightning bolt. And Reno is still hanging around. It's also Number One's first chance to see Captain Pike in person since the Enterprise went to dry dock.

If the first four episodes span just a week, it also makes Burnham and Pike finding out about Spock, Amanda visiting, and then Number One telling Pike she only told the Enterprise crew he's in trouble but didn't give any specifics seem a lot more immediate.
 
Last edited:
Discovery is too busy. There's too much going on and proper character and story development is suffering because of it. The producers need have just a few well thought out beats to each episode and stick to them. Also far too much technical gibberish being used to hang whole stories from. Some of this babble could pass on TNG and VOY where they had 26 episodes to flesh out other aspects of each show. It's killing Discovery though.
I wonder if it's a case of "too much going on" in each episode, or if it's just that they (the writers, directors, and even art directors) are too messy in the way they present the plot and various subplots in each episode.

I have seen shows with multiple subplots happening in each episode, but presented in a tighter and less messy manner. I think a lot of that depends on the false idea that all action needs to happen at a break-neck pace and the visuals of that action need to jam-packed with detail; it does not.

I don't think the actual velocity at which dramatic action happens on screen necessarily correlates with whether the audience finds that action to be enjoyable and entertaining. And I think a clean, yet thoughtfully composed visual is better than one that has detail and movement everywhere just for the sake of trying to be dynamic.

A dynamic visual composition does not need to be packed with detail.
A dynamic dramatic action scene does not need to have characters zipping breathlessly through it.

If they slow things down, tighten up the dramatic action, and tighten up the visuals, they can get away with having the same multiple number of plots plus subplots in each episode, and they would be able to do so in a manner that allows the characters time to meaningfully interact in ways that more greatly develops those characters and the overall storyline.

edit: missing word
 
Last edited:
Only if you discount Ash Tyler as a Klingon.;)

The guy has the best job in that series he gets to be a Klingon without the hours of make-up.:rommie:

Nah, man...they go authentic.

First they make-up Shazad Latif to look like a Klingon. Then on top of that Klingon look, they add makeup to make him look like Ash Tyler.

It's an extremely time-intensive makeup procedure. :hugegrin:
 
Speaking of Ash Tyler... Whatever happened to "The other Klingons should never know that you are alive..." ?

Plus L'Rell pretended to throw his severed head in some lava pit... How did she explain that? A prank?
 
Speaking of Ash Tyler... Whatever happened to "The other Klingons should never know that you are alive..." ?

Plus L'Rell pretended to throw his severed head in some lava pit... How did she explain that? A prank?

She's a politician. They have inner circles who know more than the average citizen. I'd be surprised if there weren't some people who were more "in the know" than others.

There's no such thing as a politician without skeletons in their closet or a deep, dark secret that someone else doesn't know something about but aren't telling everyone. Warriors who are sworn to L'Rell and who benefit more from her being in charge than someone else will go along with it, to keep up the pretense as long as it works to their own advantage.
 
Last edited:
She's a politician. They have inner circles who know more than the average citizen. I'd be surprised if there weren't some people who were more "in the know" than others.

There's no such thing as a politician without skeletons in their closet or a deep, dark secret that someone else doesn't know something about but aren't telling everyone.

Sure, but the Klingons present were the ones she needed to convince that she was her own woman. Now, not only did she lie to them but the question of whether she's a Federation puppet is alive again.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top