• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Supergirl - Season Four

While the politicians were made up, IIRC it was pretty clear from the context which ones were meant to be Democrats and which ones Republicans.

Interestingly, I remember in interviews how the writers said they were going to reveal Batman and Superman's political affiliations, but I don't think that ultimately happened. I wonder if that was a case of editorial interference.

I doubt that either of them have an allegiance to one party or another.
 
Clark would vote like a farmer from Kansas.

Bruce would vote like a billionaire who wants to be a trillionaire.
 
Last edited:
This has come up repeatedly, but again, while the Siegel & Shuster Superman didn't have any known political affiliation, spiritually he was very much a lefty, going up against corrupt policticians and lobbyists, arms manufacturers who instigated a war for profit, employers who underpay and disregard the safety of their workers, and so on.
 
This has come up repeatedly, but again, while the Siegel & Shuster Superman didn't have any known political affiliation, spiritually he was very much a lefty, going up against corrupt policticians and lobbyists, arms manufacturers who instigated a war for profit, employers who underpay and disregard the safety of their workers, and so on.
All true, but then John Byrne turned him into a righty.

In an interview concerning his eighties reboot, Byrne asserted that Clark was a staunch Republican who voted for Reagan both times. Even before that, his "Big blue Boy Scout" rep and the "Truth, Justice and American Way" motto went a long way to drive him away from his early comic political roots.
 
This has come up repeatedly, but again, while the Siegel & Shuster Superman didn't have any known political affiliation, spiritually he was very much a lefty, going up against corrupt policticians and lobbyists, arms manufacturers who instigated a war for profit, employers who underpay and disregard the safety of their workers, and so on.
You don't have to go back nearly that far.

6062143-15.jpg

6062144-16.jpg
 
Clark would vote like a reporter from the big city.
Bruce doesn't really care about the money. It just provides him the means to be Batman.

It's a well known fact that Superman is an asshole.

Right?

Kal-El sends Clark Kent Look-a-like Robots out to the polls to vote for him.

On one hand this is illegal, but on the other, if one robot who is aware of all Clark's positions, is solely dedicated to just voting, and giving a few less fucks than expected about the rise of evil, that might mean that Clark votes in every election that he is eligible for, since that is this robots only reasons for being "alive".

I vote, therefore I am.

Wayne bankrolls the JLA?

You don't find satellites and moon bases at the bottom of crackerjack boxes.

Because of alien tech, orbital surveillance, and just having boots on the ground before the super villain pushes a button of doom, Bruce is aware of major disasters and super villain assaults before the public, and the stock exchange.

Stock manipulation is a crime.

Bruce could make a lot of money from knowing that a city is going to flood, or an evil CEO is about to be outed as an Alien, 5 minutes before every one else in the world does
 
It's a well known fact that Superman is an asshole.

Right?

Kal-El sends Clark Kent Look-a-like Robots out to the polls to vote for him.

On one hand this is illegal, but on the other, if one robot who is aware of all Clark's positions, is solely dedicated to just voting, and giving a few less fucks than expected about the rise of evil, that might mean that Clark votes in every election that he is eligible for, since that is this robots only reasons for being "alive".

I vote, therefore I am.

Wayne bankrolls the JLA?

You don't find satellites and moon bases at the bottom of crackerjack boxes.

Because of alien tech, orbital surveillance, and just having boots on the ground before the super villain pushes a button of doom, Bruce is aware of major disasters and super villain assaults before the public, and the stock exchange.

Stock manipulation is a crime.

Bruce could make a lot of money from knowing that a city is going to flood, or an evil CEO is about to be outed as an Alien, 5 minutes before every one else in the world does
Your mind travels down some dark twisty roads.
 
Remember in the silver age, in the fortress of Solitude, there's a museum of his friends and family? Not mannequins but fully articulated robots who play out little shows to remind Superman who is he fighting for... Once a person was visiting the Fortress, who did not who Superman really is, who looked at the Daily Planet diorama and asked the best question "No Clark Kent Robot? I know he's a nerd, but you don't like him enough to build a robot? Why on earth do you hate Clark Kent Superman?"

My point is that Steve Lombard does not vote, because he's that sort of a jerk, and Clark has a Steve Lombard robot with Steve Lombard voter registration papers.
 
Did Superman tell America not to vote for Lex Luthor in 2000?

If Superman told America not to vote for Lex Luthor, and he still won, then Superman has a super-inflated sense of importance.
 
That idea existed long, long before John Byrne. That's been how Clark got the job since at least the 1952 pilot of the George Reeves TV series, and probably earlier. Certainly the comics showed Clark routinely using his super-advantage to beat Lois to the scoop on Superman stories on many occasions.

I know it's post-Byrne, but I have to mention the early STAS scene where Clark "sarcastically" confesses to Lois that he's secretly Superman, and the only payment he gets for his good deeds is the cheap thrill of beating her to a front-page story.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Yes, if they're pretending to be objective and unbiased reporters when talking about their own crimefighting. There's a clear conflict of interest there. They can't report both sides fairly when writing about a fight in which they personally took a side. Of course, everyone has some personal bias, but that's why it's essential to be honest about one's own stake in a story so that the public can be aware of one's potential bias. That's why news stories often contain disclaimers like "Full disclosure: The billionaire we're reporting on is a majority shareholder in the conglomerate that owns our newspaper/website." Part of honest journalism, part of earning the public's trust, is being scrupulously forthright about any direct or even indirect stake you have in the story, so that there's no appearance of impropriety or deception.

I'm remembering the "one wag commented" conceit where reporters would put jokes or smart-ass comments into their stories by crediting them to an anonymous "wag" who, more often than not, was themselves.
 
Not "many" enough, evidently.

Earth is not a paradise, and by human nature, it cannot be, but that does not stop many people from being good. In America, a number of major cities I've lived / worked in are--in my view--overrun with people who are near textbook examples of corruption / self-interest, prone to falling into factions and other despicable behaviors (and that's not even touching the issues of violence), because again, this is not a paradise, yet in all of that muck, there were/are still many good people among the rest.
 
I know it's post-Byrne, but I have to mention the early STAS scene where Clark "sarcastically" confesses to Lois that he's secretly Superman, and the only payment he gets for his good deeds is the cheap thrill of beating her to a front-page story.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



I'm remembering the "one wag commented" conceit where reporters would put jokes or smart-ass comments into their stories by crediting them to an anonymous "wag" who, more often than not, was themselves.

See you that smarm and raise you an idiot.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top