Would it really be all that much of a revelation? It was reveled that Troi dies in the future during TNG's last series episode, yet there she is in the movies. If it was reveled in VOY's fourth season last episode of that Harry Kim would stay a ensign, would that have ruined the last episode of VOY where Harry Kim is in fact still a ensign?Why tie their own hands by revealing the fates of all the main cast?
Would it really be all that much of a revelation? It was reveled that Troi dies in the future during TNG's last series episode, yet there she is in the movies. If it was reveled in VOY's fourth season last episode of that Harry Kim would stay a ensign, would that have ruined the last episode of VOY where Harry Kim is in fact still a ensign?
And if the writers did want to kill someone off, then TATV would simply be one possible future.
And if the writers did want to kill someone off, then TATV would simply be one possible future.
They should recton that finale at the first opportunity. For all we know none of it happened the way history portrayed it. It was just a holo program after all. Poor Trip.
The Enterprise novel "The Good that Men Do" actually does just that. It retcons the episode to a Section 31 plot. It moves the events back to soon after the Terra Prime episodes and has Trip faking his death so he can join Section 31 because of the Romulan threat that soon leads to war. Martin and Mangels use the scene where Trip winks to Archer prior to his 'death' as a sign that maybe things aren't as they seemed. It also changes some other events as well to correct the deficiencies in TATV.
I know it's not "canon" but it was a believable retcon after reading the novel. And it was one of the very few times where a novel retconned an event seen on screen. Personally I was grateful to Pocketbooks and editor Margaret Clark for fixing what I thought was a poor finale to Enterprise.
As to whether it would be better as a mid season episode, I'm not really sure it could be salvaged. It seemed like a pointless episode overall. The events surrounding the Pegasus were solved long ago and I never thought anything was missing from the resolution to that episode. I never sat and wondered why Riker decided to tell all to Picard--in fact, I was never in doubt that he would do the right thing. And as someone else noted I'm not sure what Riker and Troi learned from the events depicted in the episode that helped him with the Pegasus. Berman called it a Valentine to the fans. I'm not a Berman hater, but I'm sorry, that was just about the worse Valentine I ever got. I'll give Braga credit at least since he admits it didn't turn out the way they thought it would.
Berman also admitted years after the fact that too many people thought the episode was shit for all of them to be wrong.
The truth was that both Berman and Braga genuinely thought it was a good episode at the time and a good sendoff for the series and Star Trek as a whole. If anything, UPN was more to blame about why the episode was so lousy.
The novel has a framing story featuring Jake Sisko and Nog reviewing the true record of the events as they actually occurred.
Should have been the Titan rather than the Enterprise D. I also agree that it should be a middle episode.
A novel is a much different animal then a series finale though. And this novel set up all the ones that followed. This was the only one that featured a framing story, and I think they needed to do that here to reinterpret the final episode. It would have to be a later story then the Pegasus, and they put it far enough in the future that it didn't hamper the relaunches of the other series.
Yes, it should have just been a regular episode, presented similarly to "Living Witness." With TATV as the finale, they missed the chance to take ENT out with a bang and took it out with a whimper instead.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.