• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Avengers: Infinity War grade and discussion thread

How do you rate "Avengers: Infinity War"?


  • Total voters
    165
See my edited post above: Kevin Feige says the Homecoming sequel is set immediately after The Untitled Sequel.

I don't agree with that interpretation. SMH2 is being released after Avengers 4, but that doesn't mean that it will be narratively set after that film.... especially since Kevin Feige doesn't have the power to override Sony's wishes when it comes to their solo Trilogy.
 
I don't agree with that interpretation. SMH2 is being released after Avengers 4, but that doesn't mean that it will be narratively set after that film.... especially since Kevin Feige doesn't have the power to override Sony's wishes when it comes to their solo Trilogy.
Except everything Feige said is what Pascal said, only more recently: That the events of the two Avengers films will inform the direction of the Homecoming sequel.
 
Except everything Feige said is what Pascal said, only more recently: That the events of the two Avengers films will inform the direction of the Homecoming sequel.
Spider-Man's next movie is the best meta argument for them resetting the timeline to the moment of the snap. Things just get too messy in-universe if half the population suddenly returns after a year. There's no normalcy for him to try to maintain in tandem with his superheroics; which is much of the charm of him as a concept.
 
Well, they seem to be more advanced technology-wise, but I don't think they are far enough to count as a whole new category of inteligent. I would probably consider Galactus to fall under that category. While he doesn't really kill us for our sake per se his being alive keeps Abraxas from destroying everything (as retconned in the early 2000s) and he expresses multiple times that he doesn't really take joy in killing people, but that he must for his continued survival.
Besides, there's no reason for intelligence to constitute a justification for survival or right to determine who deserves to survive. That is simply a conceit which prefers intelligence, nothing more. It is funny how folks come up with ways to judge superiority or general worthiness for one group to survive over another that they seldom envision themselves among the losers to be culled.
 
Besides, there's no reason for intelligence to constitute a justification for survival or right to determine who deserves to survive. That is simply a conceit which prefers intelligence, nothing more. It is funny how folks come up with ways to judge superiority or general worthiness for one group to survive over another that they seldom envision themselves among the losers to be culled.

Absolutely, if intelligence becomes a criteria for judging the value of a life we're only a shade away from transferring that thinking from inter to intra species thinking. Then we start moving again down the rabbit hole of eugenics, of taking learning disabilities as being justification for involuntary euthenasia or genetic engineering.
 
Absolutely, if intelligence becomes a criteria for judging the value of a life we're only a shade away from transferring that thinking from inter to intra species thinking. Then we start moving again down the rabbit hole of eugenics, of taking learning disabilities as being justification for involuntary euthenasia or genetic engineering.

And as you can see, all that was already attempted by humans. Will probably be attempted again one day.
 
And as you can see, all that was already attempted by humans. Will probably be attempted again one day.

Which is exactly why we should learnt the lessons of history and not so casually endorse such a course of action, even when dealing in terms of fiction.
 
Last edited:
Which is exactly why we should learnt the lessons of history and not so casually endorse such a course of action, even when dealing in terms of fiction.

We can't stop the cycles of history. The best thing to do for our own mental health is to be passive observers, casually giggling as the world alternates between going to hell, and temporarily recovering.

Barring that, if you believe that fiction will help lead to the rise of the next Hitler, your problem should be with content creators, not people's reactions to the content.
 
Gwyneth Paltrow may have accidentally dropped a major spoiler in a recent interview:

From Twitter: "Pepper and Tony have had a really long journey together. She obviously starts as his dutiful assistant, and then the relationship evolves, and now this decade later they're married, and they have a child. Their relationship has evolved in all of the ways that great romances evolve.
 
Gwyneth Paltrow may have accidentally dropped a major spoiler in a recent interview:

From Twitter: "Pepper and Tony have had a really long journey together. She obviously starts as his dutiful assistant, and then the relationship evolves, and now this decade later they're married, and they have a child. Their relationship has evolved in all of the ways that great romances evolve.
So when Pepper is telling him to get off that spaceship and come home, she's pregnant? Really adds another dimension to that scene.
 
So when Pepper is telling him to get off that spaceship and come home, she's pregnant? Really adds another dimension to that scene.
Yeah, so it would seem! Hell of a wrinkle.

So, appereantly James Gunn knows what the last line of Groot was from Infinity War.....
(all of the 'I am Groot' lines mean something in English, Vin Diesel always knows what is being said)

https://twitter.com/jamesgunn/status/993265674616221696
Yup, I mentioned that a few pages back.
 
One of the Russo brothers confirmed in an interview that Spider-Man: Homecoming got the chronology wrong and Infinity War confirmed that it has been six years since The Avengers and two years since Civil War.

I kinda wonder if little discrepancies like this are going to be a way for Marvel to mildly hold the movies that they make for Sony at arm's length if the deal ever goes sour.

Although, my thinking at the time was that adding time between The Avengers & Spider-Man: Homecoming was their way of compensating for the compressed timeline between Iron Man & The Avengers. IRL, there was a 4 year gap between Iron Man & The Avengers. In-universe, it's probably less than 2 years. Iron Man 2 established that the Stark Expo began about 6 months after Tony Stark revealed his secret identity at the end of Iron Man. Iron Man 2 also showed Coulson leaving for New Mexico, which immediately lead into the events of Thor. Then, in The Avengers, Nick Fury referred to the events of Thor "a year ago."

I believe Stark put his neuroses to rest in Iron Man 3, that was one of the central themes of that movie and i liked it very much to seea superhero actually having to deal with PTSD.

While Tony Stark no longer freezes up and has panic attacks like he did in Iron Man 3, I think he's still only barely keeping it together. He's just expressing it differently. While he's too much of a control freak to just walk away entirely, we've already seen a couple attempts by him to abdicate the responsibility for protecting the world, first by creating Ultron and then by putting the U.N. in charge with the Sokovia Accords.

Precisely for this reason and the extreme shock value i believe it is time for Iron Man to die. Thanos already killed some fan favorites like Loki but there is no better way to raise the stakes and actually make people care about the events than to kill major characters. Killing half the universe is horrible on the factual side but we don't care about an alien several galaxies away, hell we don't even care about the regular humans we see vanishing in the Fury/Hill scene at the end of the movie but sacrificing main and extremely popular characters like Iron Man?

I'm not sure I could handle that. Captain America & Thor are soldiers. Dying on some nameless hill to save the world is what they signed up for. Tony never asked for any of this. He was cursed with genius, which lead to him creating as many problems as he fixed. I really hope that Tony is able to find some peace, even though I'm not sure he's psychologically capable of that. And Pepper deserves better than for Tony to die through writer fiat.

I will say the one thing that, to me, would justify killing off Tony Stark is if it turns out that Pepper is one of the ones who died in the Snap. After all of his near-brushes with death, dying to save the world feels pointless & hollow. Dying to save Pepper would be making the best out of the crappy hand that fate has dealt him.

As far as the other characters who may live or die in the next movie, I figure Cap is a goner because Bucky redeeming himself by taking on the mantle is what needs to happen next. And I think Thor is going to die because they've spent the last few movies gradually stripping away everything that he has to live for. I'm flipping a coin on Bruce Banner. I get the sense that Marvel may have run out of ideas for him.
 
We can't stop the cycles of history. The best thing to do for our own mental health is to be passive observers, casually giggling as the world alternates between going to hell, and temporarily recovering.
The best thing to do is sit back and laugh at genocide?

FMA9YGZ.gif


Don't you have fifty threads to derail with pointless negativity about ratings and box office totals? That's annoying but at least it's not like your genocidal apologist Diet Hitler ravings here.
 
That's annoying but at least it's not like your genocidal apologist Diet Hitler ravings here.

I apologize for nobody. I just think it's best to accept that there is nothing you can really do about... anything. The next Hitler will come, whether you theoretically liked Thanos or not.
 
I thought Richmond Valentine's plans for genocide seemed similar to Thanos'. I just remembered that another character also had similar plans - Bertrand Zobrist from "INFERNO".

And I think Thor is going to die because they've spent the last few movies gradually stripping away everything that he has to live for.

Hasn't it been verified that Valkyrie and some of the Asgardians on that ship are still alive?
 
Last edited:
Neither of us could cope with Rogers' beard. I get he and Black Widow are disguised, but he looks stupid. So disaponted he didn't have a shave in wakanda, and ideally son his proper uniform and have his proper shield.
 
Neither of us could cope with Rogers' beard. I get he and Black Widow are disguised, but he looks stupid. So disaponted he didn't have a shave in wakanda, and ideally son his proper uniform and have his proper shield.
:(

I'm obviously biased with my own beard, but I was thrilled he kept the beard for the whole film. I'm so very tired of the trope where the hero shaves his beard after coming out of exile so I found it very refreshing that he didn't even consider shaving it off. I thought he looked great with it!

However, the mustache that Chris Evans has right now (for another film, don't know which one) looks horrific.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top