• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

S.J. Clarkson To Direct Next Star Trek Movie, First Female Director in (Movie) Franchise’s History

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would've rather had someone like Patty Jenkins who has a big budget blockbuster under her belt. But Clarkson has an impressive television resume and everyone has to start somewhere.

Make it count, Ms. Clarkson!

Patty Jenkins would be my choice as well but she can't be everywhere. I suspect she is much in demand right now. Whether she is qualified or not one fear I do have is that this sort of represents that they might not spend much money on the film. I mean Tarantino is going to cost a great deal of money not to mention the A-List talent that will sign up to do a Tarantino movie. Also why not Roxaan Dawson? She knows Trek and it would be neat to see her get a shot at making a movie like Nimoy and Frakes got to.

Jason
 
I thought the whole George Kirk time travel plot came from the previous ST3 writers.
It's been rumoured that the Patrick McKay/JD Payne story bringing back George Kirk is a reworking of the aborted Bob Orci/McKay/Payne script that brought back Kirk Prime, but AFAIK nobody's ever confirmed or denied it.

Bob Orci let slip some details of his script on Twitter years ago, so guess we'll see how similar they are soon enough.
 
When paramount rejected the script with Shatner, I well remember Orci saying that they had a second (different) story that they too loved and hoped would get approved by the studio. My guess is this is the story JJ had mentioned loving and wanting to make a fourth movie with, the script that now is rumored getting used.
I wouldn't assume it's a reworking of the original one with Shatner and thus the one that shared similarities with Beyond. From Orci's comments, it seems him and those writers had two separate stories they proposed to the studio - and JJ probably loved the second and saved it for later when Orci left due to creative differences.

in either case, it was now a long time ago and if another movie is made, it might only have few similarities with the stories they had years ago. In the meantime, they probably changed a lot of things ..assuming those writers are really hired for the job again. Stay tuned for more conflicting news and surprises.
 
giphy.gif
I literally don't know who that is!
 
I literally don't know who that is!

I think that was the guy who directed the new "Ghostbusters" movie. I want to say Kevin Feighe but I don't know if that is the name of that guy or if that is the name of the Marvel guy. Or maybe it is the Marvel guy and this is a comment of Edgar Wright being fired and Joss Whedon being screwed with during "Age of Ultron."

Jason
 
Leonard Nimoy: 3 TV episodes on 3 series; one film of Nimoy's one-man play.
William Shatner: 10 TV episodes on 1 series.
David Carson: More than 53 TV episodes on 23 series; one TV movie.
Jonathan Frakes: 16 TV episodes on 5 series.
S.J. Clarkson: More than 76 TV episodes on 12 UK series; 23 TV episodes on 17 US series; one TV movie.

All of the people you bring up here had a good amount of experience directing Star Trek episodes or had been with the franchise for a long time and understood Trek as a hole with the exception of Nick Meyer. Ok maybe not Shatner when it comes to understanding Trek but we all know how that turned out. I'm not saying she won't do a good job I'm just saying it makes me a little uneasy the same way I felt when I found out Justin lin was doing Beyond, some people I just don't see as a good fit for Star Trek and I hope I'm wrong this time for all our sakes.

Also believe it or not the Director of a film can influence a person decision to go and see a movie, lots of them are well know and a bigger name would be a bigger draw at the theaters.
 
Justin Lin made a great Star Trek film. It was certainly more in keeping with the spirit of the original show than the previous two.

I'd agree to some extent. The character interactions and lack of relentless pacing were definitely a more Trek-like improvement. That said, the core story (which was not Lin's responsibility) was very mundane and even...(dare I say, as a fan of BEY)...uninteresting/boring to a large degree.
 
Justin Lin made a great Star Trek film. It was certainly more in keeping with the spirit of the original show than the previous two.

IMO I'd say yes he did but also no he didn't. I see your point about it being more like TOS but something about it doesn't sit right with me and it doesn't have any rewatch value to it, I picked up the Blueray when it came out but only watched it one time unlike all the older films. It's heard to put my finger on what I feel is wrong with it. I don't feel the story was that good and the way they destroyed the ships at the end was just stupid IMO anyway. But there are parts I think are great for example all the stuff at the start of the movie before they went on the mission.
 
IMO I'd say yes he did but also no he didn't. I see your point about it being more like TOS but something about it doesn't sit right with me and it doesn't have any rewatch value to it, I picked up the Blueray when it came out but only watched it one time unlike all the older films. It's heard to put my finger on what I feel is wrong with it. I don't feel the story was that good and the way they destroyed the ships at the end was just stupid IMO anyway. But there are parts I think are great for example all the stuff at the start of the movie before they went on the mission.

That's kind of how I felt too...like there were parts of it that I absolutely LOVED...and the dialogue and wit between the characters was awesome...but the overall movie experience is kind of "meh"

I mean, the only Trek movie I actively dislike is INS...and there are times this movie reminds me of that. And, like you said...I can't quite put my finger on it.
 
This is fantastic news - both the choice of a woman who's not straight out of the action-adventure school of filmmaking and the confirmation that the Abramsverse continues on in the films.

Between this and the possibility of a Tarantino movie, maybe Trek has a creative future left in it after all.
 
If they can capture the tone, wit and heart of BEY and just write a better overall story...they'll hit it out of the fucking park.
 
All of the people you bring up here had a good amount of experience directing Star Trek episodes or had been with the franchise for a long time and understood Trek as a hole with the exception of Nick Meyer.

No, neither Wise, Baird, Abrams, or Lin had any prior Trek experience either. Counting Clarkson, that's 6 directors without prior Trek experience and 4 directors with -- and of the "with," only two had actual directing experience on Trek. So it's dead wrong to claim that prior experience with Trek is the norm.

And the fact that people generally like Meyer's work on Trek should disprove the idea that prior experience is necessary. It's really bizarre to me that so many fans assume that someone hired to do a job would be incapable of learning how to do it if they didn't know already. I mean, that's a basic professional skill in any occupation. You get hired to do a job, you do a period of training. You do research. You learn the things you're obligated to learn in order to do the job. Meyer and Harve Bennett weren't that familiar with Trek, but they boned up on the whole series and learned what they needed to know. Abrams wasn't an expert on Trek, but he relied on his collaborators who were experts to fill in what he needed. When I was hired to write a Spider-Man novel, I'd only read a handful of the comics, but I tracked down every Spider-Man comic I could find and learned everything I could, and some readers praised my book for its expert level of Marvel knowledge and continuity. I learned what I needed to do the job well, because that is what you do when you are a professional doing a paying job. I think maybe fans don't get this because they only invest effort in the fictional franchises they already know and like. But professionals are operating on a very different level. This is a career, and it entails training and developing new skills just like in any other career.

I mean, come on, look at S.J. Clarkson's sizeable filmography. She's worked on dozens of different series on two continents over the past 16 years. Obviously she knows how to adapt to a new series or franchise. She didn't need to have prior Marvel experience to do acclaimed work on Jessica Jones and The Defenders, so why should she need prior Star Trek experience to do well on Trek?
 
If they can capture the tone, wit and heart of BEY and just write a better overall story...they'll hit it out of the fucking park.
Agreed. I liked what Beyond tried to do, but everything related to the story and the villain was garbage. Keep the template of Beyond, add in a good story, and you've got a damn fine movie.
 
Linn had no experience with Trek but didn't he direct some of the "Fast and Furious" movies? Those things seem to be able to print money so why his hiring might not have been seen as a positive to Trek fans because nobody wants Trek to be "Fast and the Furious" I can see how those movies might be a selling point to some casual fans.

The main selling points for this movie I think are Abrams name connected to it, which still means something especially if people like the next "Star Wars" movie, history of first female Trek movie director and Hemsworth coming back and even time travel. The very concept of time travel is always a selling point because people just love time travel. Some concepts are always going to be attractive like post-apocloptic future,time travel, comic book characters etc. Also the movie will get politcal on the internet because of a women director which can be seen as a good thing since it will get people talking about it in the very least when before people might have only had vague interest in another Kelvin Universe movie. Whether that is going to help it make money i'm not sure. Depends I guess on if your one of those people who believe in the idea that publicity is always a good thing even if it's bad publicity. Which this movie will have both. Some will be talking about it being progressive and others it will be another attack by the SJW but either way people will be talking about it.

Jason
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top