I'd hope we have left that stereotype behind, myself. Science Fiction isn't just about spaceships and anomalies and lasers. It's about people in a fantastical world. And romance is a big part of people's lives.I don't really want to see romance in my sci-fi shows period. be it straight or gay.
In the future romance is dead, all humans are cloned.....I don't really want to see romance in my sci-fi shows period. be it straight or gay. If I want to watch relationship shows there are a million other ones out there I can watch.
But if you want to see a good gay relationship on trek, check out the Orville.
So gay people who never mention, imply or are depicted as gay? This is called erasure.For me, it isn't a worry about a gay character being forced. I would just rather the character be there and allow the story to be told as things progress.
It's more annoying when it gets heralded and trumpeted in the media about it, whereas I'd rather just let it proceed and let the audience know on their own. I think a Trek viewing audience is smart enough to realize it without a giant announcement.
I'd hope we have left that stereotype behind, myself. Science Fiction isn't just about spaceships and anomalies and lasers. It's about people in a fantastical world. And romance is a big part of people's lives.
No, I don't mean that. I was referring to a PR blitz beforehand to announce it, instead of letting it come out in the story itself.So gay people who never mention, imply or are depicted as gay? This is called erasure.
So gay people who never mention, imply or are depicted as gay? This is called erasure.
Well yeah, it is a bit embarrassing for the producers to be super proud of this, as all it really does is to call attention to the fact that it took this bloody long. I mean of course better later than never, but at this point it's not much of an achievement.No, I don't mean that. I was referring to a PR blitz beforehand to announce it, instead of letting it come out in the story itself.
If Trek wanted gayness to be a big deal, they should have done it during the 90's.
Or even the noughties. IIRC, the original plan was for Malcolm Reed to be gay, but the producers wimped out.
Now it's 2017 and Star Trek has an ongoing gay character in a world where pretty much every show has LGBT representation. Wow. Amazing. Bravo.
Has it been confirmed it was Berman? There have been many cases when some people making the shows have said that they wanted to do this and that thing related to this topic, but some big boss nixed it. So that was Berman?Yeah, Berman being a homophobe really held the franchise back.
Yes, there's romance in the future but to truly be the part of the sci-fi story we watch (one of the plot) it must be romance with a sci-fi twist. We're watching science fiction. It's not supposed to be like a current romantic drama or comedy about boy meets girl or even boy meets boy (which is not controversial or ground breaking anymore). In general, I don't expect my sci-fi entertainment to be turned into a regular soap opera. There can be romance, family drama, personal drama, etc but there's almost always a sci-fi twist to it, so we tackle the subjects of romance or anything related to our lives (humanity, war, hopes, fear, society, etc) from a particular angle. Some kind of "what if" angle.I'd hope we have left that stereotype behind, myself. Science Fiction isn't just about spaceships and anomalies and lasers. It's about people in a fantastical world. And romance is a big part of people's lives.
If Trek wanted gayness to be a big deal, they should have done it during the 90's.
Or even the noughties. IIRC, the original plan was for Malcolm Reed to be gay, but the producers wimped out.
Now it's 2017 and Star Trek has an ongoing gay character in a world where pretty much every show has LGBT representation. Wow. Amazing. Bravo.
Has it been confirmed it was Berman? There have been many cases when some people making the shows have said that they wanted to do this and that thing related to this topic, but some big boss nixed it. So that was Berman?
At the points in time when the ideas were brought up, Trek was at an all-time high. Berman was pretty much the final say in what went on screen, as far as I knew.You can look at what Memory Alpha has on Berman if you're curious. Several people have accused him of being a homophobe, and no one has ever defended him. At minimum he cared so little about gay rights that he wasn't willing to stuck up for the writers when they wanted to make even passing reference to same-sex relationships.
As they should. To me, how they had Sulu in Beyond was well-done. There was some publicity about it, but it felt more like a product of a plot detail being released to the public as opposed to making a huge point about it.The funny thing to me is how some critics have complained that he's "stereotyped gay guy" and an "insult to homosexual characters."
Which I find funny because until I saw that criticism I had forgotten he was a gay character. If they introduce a relationship with another man, I trust the writers will treat it like any other relationship.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.