• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What if Burnham and Discovery were erased from the timeline?

bookworm8571

Commander
Red Shirt
My current theory is that Burnham, Discovery and the different Klingons are all from a version of the timeline that was erased or rerouted prior to the start of the original series. Burnham might eventually make the heroic decision to erase the timeline for the good of the universe.Hence Spock never had an adopted sister.

I'd like to be wrong. I'd hate to invest my time in characters who are not long term.
 
My current theory is that Burnham, Discovery and the different Klingons are all from a version of the timeline that was erased or rerouted prior to the start of the original series. Burnham might eventually make the heroic decision to erase the timeline for the good of the universe.Hence Spock never had an adopted sister.

I'd like to be wrong. I'd hate to invest my time in characters who are not long term.
On what do you base your current theory?
 
One of the showrunners promises an explanation in one of the articles for why Michael Burnham and Discovery were not previously mentioned. Time travel has been part of the series in the past, And it's what I might do if I were writing the show. I just wouldn't enjoy it much as a viewer. Hopefully I am wrong.
 
Enterprise's Temporal War does basically excuse anything and everything they want to do in Trek. One day things looked like TOS, one alien-Nazis-in-the-White-House sojourn later, everything looks like Discovery.

Or maybe it was a backwards ripple from Nero's arrival in 2233. Or maybe it was a shot from Annorax's temporal weapon in the Delta Quadrant. Or maybe Q sneezed.
 
If you think this needs to happen in order for TOS Spock to never have an adopted sister simply because he never talked about having an adopted sister, then why don't you feel the need for Sybok to do something similar, considering that Spock never spoke of Sybok either until ST:TFF.

If you want an "in-universe" reason why Spock never spoke of Burnham or Sybok on TOS, you don't need to look any further than the episode "Journey to Babel". In that episode, we see that Spock is so secretive about his family that he was more than happy not telling anyone -- not even his best friends -- anything about his parents, even when his parents were standing right in front of Kirk. I think Spock would have been fine with not telling Kirk that Sarek was his father and Amanda was his mother if Kirk did not ask Spock if he wanted to visit his parents while they were at Vulcan anyway.

So considering that scene, it was not be surprising that Spock had a half-brother Sybok who he never mentioned before, and it would not be surprising if he had a sister he never mentioned before. The reason for us not knowing about them is already consistent with "Journey to Babel", so there is no need for another explanation.
 
So you're saying that by the series' end, they'll pull the same crap as Enterprise's finale, and make it so that it all was just a lie? At least in Enterprise it actually happened... and we were just looking back and along for the ride. If they wipe out the events of the entire series of Discovery at the end, just to make things as they are NOW .. it'll be as if they never occurred. If that is the case, cancel the series before the 24th of this month, because otherwise what is the point?
 
So considering that scene, it was not be surprising that Spock had a half-brother Sybok who he never mentioned before, and it would not be surprising if he had a sister he never mentioned before. The reason for us not knowing about them is already consistent with "Journey to Babel", so there is no need for another explanation.

The secret adoptive sister just reeks of fanwank after we already had a secret half-brother. I would've rather that Burnham stood on her on than having connections to Spock and Sarek.
 
What about the secret Ambassador Father?

That happened within TOS, and was needed for the characters growth. I hate the idea of messing with characters fifty years after the fact.

If it was a reboot, I'd feel a bit differently since there is a Spock who isn't already a cultural legend and can be developed in a slightly different manner.

YMMV.
 
He might also have a wife/husband we don't know about according to TNG.

Or Sarak had another kid who got married.
 
I think Kirk was Spock's secret adopted brother. That's alluded to in "Whom Gods Destroy." Sarek and Kirk just descided not to tell Spock up front. Now that I think about it, all the Enterprise crew were Spock's adopted siblings. And probably a few other people as well. You. You're Spock's adopted sibling, and you're Spock's adopted sibling!

Hey, it's never mentioned so it's possible.
 
Maybe they can do a Brady Bunch-esque prequel, about Ambassador Sarek and his six secret children! I want one of them to be a Horta. But it will still be the Prime universe!

Would you buy the Prime² Universe?

Actually, now I'm going to have to create a Brady Bunch style montage to come to terms with this. I did a nice Three Stooges one, and a Doctor Who one as well.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top