• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it's more likely they realized they can hardly call for sanctions on opposing counsel for inadvertently releasing the same information they did — unredacted — in their own motion for summary judgment.

I was wondering if maybe W&S published unredacted materials to start with because they are fed up and want to force a settlement out of Alec.

So, Alec Peters is now officially the most hated person in (or adjacent to) Trek, isn't he. I feel like I'm watching history being made.

I would reserve that for a person reported about in some blog post somewhere (saw it on RPF or somewhere) who was caught stealing from a prop warehouse and shoved the guard off the catwalk causing a concussion or broken bones for the victim.

I wouldn't compare Alec to Mr. Berman. The latter seemed just to be losing the pulse of the fans towards the end. He didn't try to spin off his own Trek empire on the side.

And @carlosp isn't a blogger but a journalist, so Axamonitor's okay. (I also know that Michael Hinman has referenced speaking to attorneys before as well.)

Just wait until Newsweek does their inevitable followup one column article about that story they ran before. Especially if that Lexus turns up on the donor dime.

Where's the million dollars, Alec?

Sushi & Cupcakes: The Alec Peters Story, coming this spring to Lifetime.

Somewhere, somehow, a Trek actor will slip in "I gave them cupcakes". It will be glorious.
 
Last edited:
Heck, I'd let Peters keep the money because he's been so damned entertaining. On the condition he not associate himself with Star Trek (not even prop sales) or try to crowdsource funds again.
 
Somewhere, somehow, a Trek actor will slip in "I gave them cupcakes". It will be glorious.

0d948186cf4f51b97554bfc8a1b08a62.jpg
 
Heck, I'd let Peters keep the money because he's been so damned entertaining. On the condition he not associate himself with Star Trek (not even prop sales) or try to crowdsource funds again.

I hope he recognizes there are no more bamboo cannons to be made, that it was all just a story, and heaves his egomania out of his system.
 
Last edited:
Well, if Lane is a writer for Axanar, and was part of the lawsuit (or at least deposed), then he could definitely say he's the only one in the batch that has had contact with the lawyers. That he was a target/of interest is just details...

Also, entertaining that Alec can't figure out what the word "bias" means. Keeps getting used as meaning 'negative opinions towards something', when you can just as easily be positively biased towards something as well. A writer from Axanar is not unbiased, just likely doesn't have a negative bias. Or not at the moment, plenty of former Axanar folks that are now negatively biased once the curtain was pulled back... :lol:
 
Couldn't W&S get in trouble if they did this?
Considering, as I noted yesterday, that W&S represented Kevin Trudeau even after he had his supporters threaten a federal judge, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say there's probably nothing LFIM could do that would make them turn on him.

Incidentally, what do y'all think the reaction will be from LFIM and RMB should Judge Klausner grant C/P partial summary judgment?
 
Incidentally, what do y'all think the reaction will be from LFIM and RMB should Judge Klausner grant C/P partial summary judgment?

Would that grant the studios the right to attach assets immediately to assure their costs are met?

I imagine any bill they present would be subject to dispute by W&S, since it would probably be a grant of "reasonable" costs... or would they have to sue Alec/Axanar for the costs, and that's all the right they get?

Or could W&S invoke right of appeal and push it off indefinitely?
 
Considering, as I noted yesterday, that W&S represented Kevin Trudeau even after he had his supporters threaten a federal judge, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say there's probably nothing LFIM could do that would make them turn on him.

Incidentally, what do y'all think the reaction will be from LFIM and RMB should Judge Klausner grant C/P partial summary judgment?
Tweetstorm. Angry blog post(s). KS and IGG spamming.

PS @muCephi They would not be able to seize anything ... yet. Partial S/J will be on the finding of liability. They would still have a trial for damages, so the other thing that would happen would be A LOT of communications pushing AP to settle.
 
Would that grant the studios the right to attach assets immediately to assure their costs are met?

If Judge Klausner grants partial summary judgment along the terms of the studios' proposed order, the only immediate relief would be injunctive--i.e., LFIM would be legally ordered to stop infringing copyrights. There may also be an order for costs. But as @jespah said, any damages would have to be determined separately, possibly by a jury.

PS. Just for clarification, here is the exact text of C/P's proposed order with respect to partial summary judgment:

* * *

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that partial summary judgment is entered in favor
of Plaintiffs Paramount Pictures Corporation and CBS Studios Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) in the above-captioned action, and Defendants Axanar Productions, Inc. and Alec Peters (collectively, “Defendants”) are liable for copyright infringement, and for contributory copyright and vicarious copyright infringement.

The Court also declares that Defendants’ works Prelude to Axanar, Axanar, and the script for Axanar (collectively, the “Axanar Works”) infringe upon Plaintiffs’ Star Trek Copyrighted Works.

The Court finds that this is a proper case for issuance of a permanent injunction because: (1) the continued production and distribution of the Axanar Works would cause irreparable harm to the market for the Star Trek Copyrighted Works, (2) a legal remedy is inadequate, (3) if an injunction is not granted, Plaintiffs will be harmed because Defendants will continue to create works that infringe Plaintiffs’ copyrights in the Star Trek Copyrighted Works, and (4) the public interest would be served with a permanent injunction because it would protect Plaintiffs’ copyrights in the Star Trek Copyrighted Works against increased infringement.

The Court orders that Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors, assigns, subsidiaries, and all persons, firms, and corporations acting in concert with them, are hereby restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing the copyrights in the Star Trek Copyrighted Works, including but not limited to continuing to distribute, market, advertise, promote, produce, sell, or offer for sale the Axanar Works or any works derived or copied from the Star Trek Copyrighted Works, and from participating or assisting in any such activity.

Plaintiffs shall recover costs from Defendants.
 
I was wondering if maybe W&S published unredacted materials to start with because they are fed up and want to force a settlement out of Alec.
^^^
I seriously doubt that is the case because if something like that were proven the lawyers and law firm involved in any such situation would face numerous court sanctions, and well as civil and possibly criminal liability - not to mention major harm to their professional reputations.

If they're really fed up with their client or his actions, they would petition the court to be relieved of any further responsibility for; and ask to be removed from/relieved of any further responsibility for the case.

It was most likely just a mistake on their part. Nobody's perfect.
 
So Carlos' latest article leads with a photo caption saying part of the 'expenses' was a trip to London in 2015 for a Warhammer convention, which apparently falls under the 'paid for by Alec' category once he reimbursed the charges.

This is the first item I have seen which could not conceivably be spun as a business expense in even the remotest way. Even auto maintenance someone could conceivably argue would be 'reimbursement for company use' if the car was used mainly for Axanar business (I know, but still...).

Wonder how far down the rabbit hole goes? Has anyone looked at every line item?

Wouldn't this just be the last straw for any defenders of Axanar financial integrity?
 
Just wanted to take a moment again to say thanks to all of you. Sounds like I'm about the get the boot so I'll save the mods the trouble and just scramble my password after this post and will not be back. Ive cause enough trouble here.

Take care, all of you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top