I imagine Fuller has had "his vision ready" for quite a while now.
You're free to imagine whatever you like.
I imagine Fuller has had "his vision ready" for quite a while now.
Although it's presumably still a work in progress.
Heck, we all remember Captain Nicole Janeway of the U.S.S. Voyager, right? And "Doctor Zimmerman," the cranky holographic doctor? And Tuvok, the elderly Vulcan security officer?
(All straight from the original VOYAGER bible, btw.)
And I loved that they made Ensign Ro a regular on DS9!![]()
Look, we rank just above a vegetarian making news and a tv personality I've never heard of who doesn't like sex!!! Way to go guys. Other than this, most fans on Facebook seem to be generally miserable and hate that there's even a trailer out...so nothing new.
Other than this, most fans on Facebook seem to be generally miserable and hate that there's even a trailer out...so nothing new.
Okay.You're free to imagine whatever you like.
Info is from TrekMovie.Com so it's a reliable but unconfirmed rumorExcept that info is not from a reliable source in the least.
Don't know what Kirk has to do with it, but that's what did Voyager in for me.Destroyed, Kirk?!
I'll disagree with that bit of hyperbole.
I can't quite see the monster maroons making a full time comeback, i'd hazard that they would do something a bit more of a hybrid of TNG and Maroons, but who knows?Also imagine the monster maroons being shot in Digital HD if this is post-TUC. Hmmmmm
Firstly, I've never even heard of TrekMovie.com.Info is from TrekMovie.Com so it's a reliable but unconfirmed rumor![]()
BirthMoviesDeath is reporting that the new Star Trek television series “definitely isn’t in the JJ rebootverse.”
Info is from TrekMovie.Com so it's a reliable but unconfirmed rumor![]()
Praxis?
Hmm, point taken. I was referring to the time period of TUC - Nicholas Meyer made some remarks which suggest that the show might take place in that era.And note that the TrekMovie.Com article is merely citing Faraci's original post. They're not claiming to have any inside information of their own.
It doesn't matter how many websites keep parroting the same rumor, citing the original post by Faraci. That doesn't make make it any more or less reliable.
why WOULDN'T it be in the same "universe" or timeline?
Okay, you didn't mention that it was a subjective experience. That your subjective experience of Voyger was destroyed is, of course, absolutely valid. But lacking "for me," it was worded as an absolute that would apply to everyone. Though I'd still take issue with such a dramatic word as "destroyed." Really?Don't know what Kirk has to do with it, but that's what did Voyager in for me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.