The lawsuit isn't about raising money for Ares Studios. If you read the lawsuit it's really just about using copyrighted elements that CBS and Paramount own.
Neil
Neil
The lawsuit isn't about raising money for Ares Studios. If you read the lawsuit it's really just about using copyrighted elements that CBS and Paramount own.
Neil
I think you're onto something here, Neil. People think that the complaint is about Axanar making too much crowdfunding money or not spending it prudently or spending the money on profit-making productions. The complaint is explicitly about copyright infringement.The lawsuit isn't about raising money for Ares Studios. If you read the lawsuit it's really just about using copyrighted elements that CBS and Paramount own.
Neil
Exactly. If you stopped reading at that paragraph, you would assume the sound stage and set were only going to be used for Axanar, which is reasonable. That's why you would need to scroll down to the sound stage section. Here's a quote (again from the 31 July 2014 capture):
As far back as that first Axanar Kickstarter, they made it clear that the studio was going to be used for commercial ventures after Axanar was completed.
The lawsuit isn't about raising money for Ares Studios. If you read the lawsuit it's really just about using copyrighted elements that CBS and Paramount own.
Neil
thanks I do remember reading these but lost track of where in all the funding docs they were. It does seem a very explicit statement that money from the Trek-IP based kickstarter pitch will go into 'profit' which CBS outlawed for fan productions.
true. the profit/permanent studio part may come into play in determining the amount of damages awarded, and the assets which might be recoverable should CBS win.
Yep, that's why I thought earlier than CBS would be OK with an out-of-court settlement that simply stopped Axanar, and perhaps provided some compensation for the unlicensed merchandise. They don't care about Ares Studios, they just don't want professional, low-budget Star Trek films being made under the guise of "fan films".I think you're onto something here, Neil. People think that the complaint is about Axanar making too much crowdfunding money or not spending it prudently or spending the money on profit-making productions. The complaint is explicitly about copyright infringement.
Does everyone agree that it is the likely the payment of a salary (albeit "below industry average"Yep, that's why I thought earlier than CBS would be OK with an out-of-court settlement that simply stopped Axanar, and perhaps provided some compensation for the unlicensed merchandise. They don't care about Ares Studios, they just don't want professional, low-budget Star Trek films being made under the guise of "fan films".
The word "professional" is rather subjective. To be honest, Prelude to Axanar still felt like a fan film to me.No, I think it was 1.3 million dollars, the repeated public statements that this was a professional film, and the fact that they ignored a fairly explicit warning from CBS in August.
Oh yeah. Okay, then can we generalize salary payments to "demonstrated attemtp to profit monetarily" or some such formulation? Because Axanar is being singled out, and other fan films should explicitly know what mistakes to avoid to save themselves the same hassle.I think the unlicensed merchandise would be more of an issue than the payment of salaries.
Because Axanar is being singled out, and other fan films should explicitly know what mistakes to avoid to save themselves the same hassle.
Does everyone agree that it is the likely the payment of a salary (albeit "below industry average") out of raised funds that was likely why Axanar was specifically targeted, unlike every other fan film?
Does everyone agree that it is the likely the payment of a salary (albeit "below industry average") out of raised funds that was likely why Axanar was specifically targeted, unlike every other fan film?
Honestly? If I'm a fan film producer, I'm doing nothing with CBS IP at this point without the express consent of CBS. Too much risk involved, and I'm sure as hell not going to risk my livelihood on a hobby.
Which may well be part of the point in bringing the suit.
JMHO.
We don't know that they have been singled out, they might have plans to close all fan films. This really could be a "sue one fan production so our C&Ds cause real fear" situation. They might have been chosen because they're high profile but how far down they go after Axanar falls is unknown.
The word "professional" is rather subjective. To be honest, Prelude to Axanar still felt like a fan film to me.
Oh yeah. Okay, then can we generalize salary payments to "demonstrated attemtp to profit monetarily" or some such formulation? Because Axanar is being singled out, and other fan films should explicitly know what mistakes to avoid to save themselves the same hassle.
People think that the complaint is about Axanar making too much crowdfunding money or not spending it prudently or spending the money on profit-making productions. The complaint is explicitly about copyright infringement.
That's only guesswork at this point, though. There has been nothing official from CBS/Paramount indicating this is about anything else than copyright infringement. Or has there?Both are true from a certain point of view.
The big pile of money that's involved in this, shady businesses practices and profiteering of ST IP is the reason why they brought the complaint against Axanar(and not any other fan film previously).
The copyright infringement is the means by which to bring them down.
An here come the haters (Response to HMS). I will be going back into the fringes and observing again. I don't want to get into it with anyone either way.
The non-hero ships do seem to be derivative of the styling of nuTrek. But the Ares looks straight up TOS (and I rather like it, for what it's worth).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.