Why didn't Starfleet reverse engineer Spock's ship

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies XI+' started by DarthTom, Dec 13, 2012.

  1. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    One thing that always annoys me about Trek generally - even in the Abrams universe - is they always have fantastic engineering solutions to problems that later get lost and forgotten about and are simply used as plot devices.

    So, in the Abrams universe - why wasn't Spock's far advanced ship reverse engineered with technology from presumably over 100 years in the future?

    With that technology Star Fleet could defeat any enemy - I guess with the exception of the Q or other omnipotent beings.
     
  2. Vektor

    Vektor Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2001
    Location:
    Spokane, WA, USA
    Spock's ship? You mean the Jellyfish? It was destroyed along with the Narada.
     
  3. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Ah shit, I forgot. Thanks. Nonetheless, the older version of Spock sure could give the federation that exists now a big head start from everyone else in the Alpha Quadrant.
     
  4. Pondslider

    Pondslider Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    He could, but it doesn't sound like something Spock would do.
     
  5. RoJoHen

    RoJoHen Awesome Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2000
    Location:
    QC, IL, USA
    I'm sure there's some Alternate Universe Prime Directive or some other nonsense that would be broken by any such interference.
     
  6. Vektor

    Vektor Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2001
    Location:
    Spokane, WA, USA
    Realistically, if Spock Prime's existence in this timeline became known, he'd probably have half the galaxy after him for his technical knowledge if nothing else. Even if Starfleet were noble enough not to use him for their own purposes, they'd have no choice but to hide him away somewhere, willingly or not, just to prevent anyone else from getting him.

    My guess is that Spock Prime has not revealed his true identity to anyone but Kirk and his younger self, and that he would strive to minimize interfering in the timeline except where necessary to correct previous interference, which was basically his modus operandi in the last movie.
     
  7. King Daniel Beyond

    King Daniel Beyond Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    #istandwithcbs
    Spock Prime said he wasn't going to hide himself at the end of the movie. He's out enough to have been the guy who chose the planet for the new Vulcan colony, and by the way he was watching Kirk's appointment as captain, I wouldn't be suprised if he had a hand in that too.

    However, Scotty says in Star Trek Ongoing #15 that he's refusing to share details of his future or technology.
     
  8. Vektor

    Vektor Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2001
    Location:
    Spokane, WA, USA
    Like I said, realistically he probably couldn't get away with that. What he's carrying around in his head would be too valuable, and too many powers throughout the galaxy who don't give a damn about meddling with the timeline, etc.
     
  9. King Daniel Beyond

    King Daniel Beyond Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    #istandwithcbs
    Well, powers vying for Spock's future knowledge was going to be the subject of the novel The Hazard of Concealing, until Bad Robot had it cancelled. Maybe they'll elaborate more on his status in the next movie - Nimoy was rumoured to be in it (in "long and stately robes") after all.
     
  10. E-DUB

    E-DUB Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    I'm guessing he told his younger counterpart: "If you ever run across an old DY-100 class ship, blast it out of the stars."