Which future is it?

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies XI+' started by Tribble27, Jan 19, 2014.

  1. Tribble27

    Tribble27 Cadet Newbie

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Location:
    Wisconsin USA
    Unlike a lot of Trekkers, I really enjoy the JJ Trek, but I do have one problem that I've never seen anyone else mention. That doesn't mean no one else hasn't mentioned it, I just haven't seen it anywhere...

    One thing I like about Star Trek as opposed to Star Wars is that Trek portrays our future, not only that, but it is a future we would love to see, a better future than other sci-fi envisions. When Orci and company wrote the new Trek, they created an alternate reality so they could have the freedom to write without contradicting canon. I compleetly understand that choice, it makes sence from a writers point of view. It is true that Star Trek has never been shy of parallel realities, but the main timeline was always supposed to be our direct future. This Abramsverse kills that.

    We live in a liner timeline. There will be a real 23rd century. The splitting of the timeline makes it unclear whether JJ trek is our future or the original is. The fantasy that this will be our future isn't there anymore, and I miss it.
     
  2. Relayer1

    Relayer1 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Location:
    The Black Country, England
    Wasn't it already established (probably more than once) that there were lots of timelines anyway ?
     
  3. King Daniel Beyond

    King Daniel Beyond Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    #istandwithcbs
    The idea is that the timeline splits in 2233 - in one version of history, Nero appears, attacks the USS Kelvin and eventually destroys Vulcan. In the other, he doesn't appear and history unfolds as seen in TOS/TNG/DS9 and VOY.

    So really they're both possible futures. That being said, Trek's world may be similar to ours, but like the Earth in the Marvel movies, it isn't quite. We never had the kind of technology that created Khan in the 70's, a war between Augment supermen in the 90's, cryopods and ships with artificial gravity in 1996, a computer tycoon named Henry Starling who made a fortune from a crashed 29th century Starfleet ship etc.

    It doesn't mean we can't make our world a better place, where there's no hunger and everyone knows how to read.
     
  4. Tribble27

    Tribble27 Cadet Newbie

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Location:
    Wisconsin USA
    I get the split in two timelines. And as for Khan never having really existed, or there never having been a Voyager 6 launch, and other things that have come and gone, that is just a testament to the fact that Star Trek keeps outliving expectations. The 1990s seemed like a million years in the future in the 1960s. But when real history unfolded different, we can sort of set that aside and move on and still keep the fantasy of this being "The" future. It's harder to do that with active main timelines. Just a minor nitpick, but we fans love our nitpicks.

    Maybe we all live in the evil mirror universe? I should grow a goatee...
     
  5. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, MO, USA
    Our future will not be anything like that represented in Trek, because Trek is fiction and reality tends not to follow the same script. That being said, Trek shows us an idealized, fantasized, and romanticized version of the future that we should try to work towards, but that's really the extent of it no matter how many times it's rewritten, reimagined, or rebooted.
     
  6. Herkimer Jitty

    Herkimer Jitty Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Location:
    Dayglow, New California Republic
    They're both our future.

    People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big... area rug.
     
  7. urbandefault

    urbandefault Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Location:
    Sickbay, dammit
    "The future hasn't been written yet." - Emmett L. Brown, Ph.D.

    ;)
     
  8. The Stig

    The Stig Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Location:
    Behind the wheel.
    What constitutes 'a lot?'
     
  9. M'Sharak

    M'Sharak Definitely Herbert. Maybe. Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Location:
    Terra Inlandia, Kelvin timeline
    One million seven hundred seventy one thousand five hundred sixty one.
     
  10. P0sitr0nic

    P0sitr0nic Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2001
    Location:
    Jedi Council
    I disagree. Our own future has been shaped by the Trek TV shows already. Cell phones, medical scanners. We seem to love to make that future a reality.
     
  11. BillJ

    BillJ Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    Per Ardua
    Seems odd to give Star Trek credit for technology that would've been invented any way.
     
  12. AgentCoop

    AgentCoop Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    This "issue" has been with us since TOS, hasn't it? Mirror Universe?
     
  13. Hythlodeus

    Hythlodeus Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    in other words...wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff?
     
  14. FormerLurker

    FormerLurker Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Would it have been, though? The developers of today's medical scanners and bedside monitors in hospitals have repeatedly stated that they were inspired by the bio-beds in Star Trek, and wanted to develop that technology.
     
  15. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, MO, USA
    "That future" is a fantasy, created by studio execs first and foremost for entertainment and money-making purposes (and not necessarily in that order). Trek's inspired some things like you mentioned in our world, but it isn't going to be an accurate depiction of how things will truly be. "The real" future will be different--more advanced than Trek in some areas, but substantially far behind in others.
     
  16. Set Harth

    Set Harth Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Location:
    Morrowind
    In other words, don't expect warp drive anytime soon.
     
  17. beneldon

    beneldon Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    Rottinghaus Manor
    There have been a lot of things that have mucked up the strict progression of cause to effect, but from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint of the timeline the wibble has been wobbled and the wobbled has been wibblied.

    It would be interesting if Trek went in a direction that altered the timeline resulting in a world where the events of our time are the result of such wibbling and wobbling to explain King Daniel Into Darkness's "We never had the kind of technology that created Khan in the 70's, a war between Augment supermen in the 90's, cryopods and ships with artificial gravity in 1996, a computer tycoon named Henry Starling who made a fortune from a crashed 29th century Starfleet ship etc."
     
  18. CommanderRaytas

    CommanderRaytas Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Location:
    Intergalactic Planetary Planetary Intergalactic
    As long as society evolves the way it has on ST-Earth, I'm cool with it.
     
  19. Gojira

    Gojira Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Location:
    Stompin' on Tokyo
    I view Star Trek as being from a fictional Earth very similar to ours. On that Earth was the rise of Khan and the Eugenics War in the 80s/90s. In 2233 of that Earth's History Nero came back in time and created another timeline that did not erase the events of TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY.
     
  20. RandyS

    RandyS Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Location:
    Randyland
    Sure it has.

    I just wrote it last week.