When did the perception of Insurrection change?

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies I-X' started by Lance, Jul 31, 2013.

  1. suarezguy

    suarezguy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    I agree except that the stakes should also be something different from Earth always being (directly) endangered.
     
  2. BillJ

    BillJ Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    alt.nerd.obsessive.pic
    I think TMP is an acquired taste. There's alot of good stuff in there but also soooo much bullshit. :lol:
     
  3. Captain_Q

    Captain_Q Lieutenant Junior Grade Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Location:
    221 B Baker Street
    If you look at any Star Trek film, or episode for that matter, with a critical eye then it's all a bunch of bull shit. But it's fantasy, and that's what it's there for :) That's why I turn off my critiques whenever I watch one of these. I just go "hey, it's Star Trek, your favorite TV show. Sit back and enjoy it and just don't give a damn."
     
  4. T'Girl

    T'Girl Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2009
    Location:
    T'Girl
    TUC is very tied to the ending of the cold war between east and west, and as that recedes more into history the movie makes less sense. To my generation it's a relic of the past, equal to vietnam and korea.

    Even a single scene where Admiral Cartwright and the other conspirators explain their motivations and reasoning really would have helped the movie.

    Something more than "Gee, I don't trust the Klingons, I hope we never have peace."

    [​IMG]
     
  5. marksound

    marksound Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Location:
    Planet Carcazed
    As things like the cold war recede into history, the more important it is to teach that history and remember it.

    It may be seen as less relevant these days, but it's still important to know what happened and why. Those things are a part of all of us, and if we don't learn from the mistakes of previous generations, well, you know the rest ...
     
  6. sonak

    sonak Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Location:
    in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination

    it's clearly a Cold War metaphor yes, but it can be applied successfully to a lot of long-term conflicts, from the Arab-Israeli one, to North Korea-South Korea, etc. The central issues of peace, security, the military-industrial complex, etc. are still as relevant as ever, it's just that the cutesy references like "only Nixon could go to China" are a little dated.
     
  7. Lucky

    Lucky Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Location:
    Mississippi
    From what I remember, the movie was considered a disappointing film from the beginning.
     
  8. plynch

    plynch Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    Outer Graceland
    I'll never understand why people who liked TNG don't like a movie that's "just like a big TNG episode."

    The whole Picard-action-hero thing was so odd after watching TNG. I liked INS then and I do now. And I am primarily a TOS guy.
     
  9. bullethead

    bullethead Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Because they expect better storytelling and production values from a movie than a TV show. Also, there's the whole progression of the franchise's sophistication, which made people have higher expectations from the movies than the show, especially when movies automatically mean you're getting a fewer long works instead of a long show made up a few shorter episodes.
     
  10. Dream

    Dream Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2001
    Location:
    Hotel Transylvania
    Because the story wasn't worth being told on the big screen. That's the same problem with TFF. We only get one TNG movie every few years, and fans deserved better than a weak two parter with bigger budget. You can't blame the fans that were disappointed.
     
  11. Greg Cox

    Greg Cox Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Location:
    Oxford, PA
    Yeah, I suspect it has less to do the with budget and the size of the screen than the timing. When you're only getting one new TNG adventure every few years, you expect more than just an ordinary, so-so episode. You want your socks blown off.
     
  12. MacLeod

    MacLeod Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Location:
    Great Britain

    Sort of like Kirk's line "Don't believe them, don't trust them". Of course that was preceeded by the meeting where it eas mentioned that the Klingons were untrustworthy.

    Then we have more at the end about people being frightened of change. That's as true today as it was then.

    And not to diminish other wars but the end of the Cold War was a far more significant event in world history. The Vietnam and Koren wars are largely forgotten(in some ares of the world). WWII even though it preceded those wars is more remembered globally.
     
  13. SpHeRe31459

    SpHeRe31459 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    Actually the Korean and Vietnam wars were both Cold War motivated wars at that, so it just helps reinforce the idea that TUC was a great capper to an era of Trek metaphors/stand-ins for the world powers/nations of that era.
     
  14. Greg Cox

    Greg Cox Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Location:
    Oxford, PA
    It occurs to me that pretty much all of the TOS movies tried to do something special that made them more than just a typical TV episode brought to the screen:

    TMP brought back the original crew and threatened Earth itself!
    TWOK killed off Spock! And gave Kirk a son!
    TSFS blew up the Enterprise! And brought Spock back to life!
    TVH: The end of the trilogy! And a brand new Enterprise!
    TFF: Er, did we mention that Spock has a brother?
    TUC: The final voyage of the original crew--and a new era of peace with the Klingons.

    To be fair, the TNG movies started out with the same approach:

    GEN: Picard meets Kirk! The Enterprise is destroyed!
    FC: Picard vs. Borg, the big rematch! Meet the Borg Queen! And, hey, First Contact with the Vulcans!
    INS: Er, these aliens we've never heard about before are getting a raw deal from Starfleet, and they're really nice and peaceful and enlightened and all . . . .

    See what I mean? Nothing that particularly cries out for exclamation points on that last one.

    Later on, NEM was at least trying to think big: Picard's clone! Remans! Riker and Troi get married! Data dies . . . sorta.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2013
  15. Lance

    Lance Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Location:
    The Enterprise's Restroom
    The TOS movies were (for the most part) genuinely theatrical experiences. The TNG movies were (for the most part) genuinely not. ;)

    See, this "TNG movies are just two-part episodes on the big screen" thing is a hard thing to shake. Even the lauded First Contact suffers to some degree. I can't help feeling it was the mentality of the production team. TOS movies were made by 'movie people', and even when TNG was off and running from 1987 onwards, the TOS movies were still their own beast, entirely seperate from the television production pack. There was a line in the sand between the two iterations of Trek. However, starting in 1994, Rick Berman was put in charge of both movies and television, and I wonder if he brought a television sensibility (the "sausage factory" approach to working out a story) to the movie series. The way the scripts were structured, the way they were shot, it was a completely different world because the people behind the scenes were coming from a completely different school of thought to the 'movie people' who had helmed Treks I-VI. One can't help wonder if it might have been better to have had TNG move to the big screen, but still maintain a seperate production team rather than trying to amalgamate everything 'Star Trek' under one banner.
     
  16. SpHeRe31459

    SpHeRe31459 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    I could certainly see that. It would indeed be interesting to have seen what would happened if they had more separation.

    I think this actually dovetails nicely with the discussion about ENT and it's undoing by the network suits who just wanted to keep doing what was working previously. I think we started to see this mentality with the TNG movies first, and the UPN shows shortly thereafter.

    You can see the corporate suits "logic" about the TNG movies:

    The Trek movies were a cash cow.
    TNG has become a well respected show and a cash cow in its own right.
    So of course in corporate-land taking the successful TNG production + Trek movies must equal major cash cow, right?

    Of course it did take a TV person (Harve Bennett) to help the TOS movies, so there is some precedent in the Trek movies that having a TV person as producer might be beneficial.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2013
  17. plynch

    plynch Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    Outer Graceland
    I really don't.

    Especially with the JJ movies, I wish they'd stop trying to be soEPIC/KEWL and just tell a Trek-like story. I think I need to just start reading the novels.

    Lots and lots of very good films have been made that didn't try to blow your socks off. I am not the normal American moviegoer in 2013, I admit.
     
  18. DonIago

    DonIago Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2001
    Location:
    Burlington, VT, USA
    I wouldn't call TWoK "EPIC/KEWL" (was it considered so at the time?), but I would say it tells a story larger in scope than most of the TNG movies managed to do.
     
  19. sonak

    sonak Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Location:
    in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination

    come on, say what you will about TFF but it does have ambition and an attempt at epic scope.

    "the Enterprise goes to find God," flawed as a premise though it may be, is not small-scale.


    INS, on the other hand, doesn't even try, and may be the only film in the entire movie series not to.
     
  20. DalekJim

    DalekJim Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Location:
    Great Britain
    I'd say INS tried a lot harder than NEM and STID, which just looked at the most popular Star Trek movie and tried to remake it.

    INS is a case of too many people pushing in different directions. I enjoy it, but it's a mess. First Contact is flawed, but has a clearer direction to it.