Transwarp mechanics

Discussion in 'Trek Tech' started by Unicron, Nov 29, 2012.

  1. Unicron

    Unicron Continuity Spackle Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Location:
    The Pyxis Unity
    I recently got ahold of some old FASA stuff, and it's been interesting to read some of the early descriptions of transwarp. It was never really explained in canon how it was supposed to function, or why it was superior to standard warp. FASA suggested that the transwarp engines were designed to work in conjunction with the transporter system, and that this combination would allow a ship to project a "beaming envelope" ahead of itself which would operate in tandem with the warp envelope. In effect, the ship would transport itself while simultaneously warping space around it and thus be able to boost its traditional speed faster than normal.

    Mr. Scott's Guide has a somewhat different interpretation, with the transwarp project being based in part on the interphasic rift encountered by the Enterprise in "Tholian Web." The engines were designed to replicate this rift on a much smaller and controlled scale, and the ship would travel faster in the rift than in conventional warp while the crew would experience no change in their perception of time. This system is more similar to FTL drives in Star Wars and B5.
     
  2. SchwEnt

    SchwEnt Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    That's right, I remember the FASA explanation.
    Evidently, the "trans" in transwarp refers to transporter technology, hence the "beaming of the warp envelope" idea.

    Then there's the explanation in "Mr. Scott's Guide", which is a totally different theory.

    I'll add one more to the mix, from the Spaceflight Chronology.

    Written at the time of TMP, it postulated an imminent new breakthrough in warp technology (which was seen on-screen two films later in TSFS). The book called this breakthrough "super-warp" rather than the later "trans-warp". It all seems a variation on sonic speeds (supersonic, hypersonic, trans-sonic, etc)

    In any case, the idea was that warp speeds would be bumped up exponentially. Instead of the warp factor being cubed times lightspeed, it would advance to the 4th power.

    Warp 6 = 6^3 lightspeed (216 times lightspeed)
    Transwarp 6 = 6^4 lightspeed (1296 lightspeed)

    Any given superwarp/transwarp factor is to the 4th power rather than the 3rd power of warp factors.

    Interesting idea, for whatever it's worth.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
  3. Unicron

    Unicron Continuity Spackle Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Location:
    The Pyxis Unity
    The FASA version is interesting, if a little odd mechanically to me. That was rather typical of FASA though. :p It would seem like trying to get the two envelopes to interact safely would be risky, but there's an equal chance it could work the way the game described.
     
  4. SicOne

    SicOne Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Timo has some interesting information about transwarp in the Excelsior section of his ship files. I believe he's put links to them in one of the other threads. There's some good research in there of what little has been available about transwarp, and even better extrapolation of the material.
     
  5. Timo

    Timo Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    I'd have liked to take into account both the FASA and SJ backstories somehow, but both ideas appeared a bit too oddball. The "going deeper into subspace" interpretation is closer to SJ in the end.

    Then again, transporters and warp speeds mix again in Scotty's "transwarp beaming" in STXI... Perhaps the drive indeed evolves from similar ideas in the 2280s, only Scotty isn't the one behind it in the original timeline, and bumps himself in the head ever after when the Nobel slips from his hands (the bumping in turn explaining why he doesn't quite remember Jim Kirk is dead in "Relics"!).

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  6. Longinus

    Longinus Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    I think Federation calls anything beyond their normal warp technology 'transwarp'. Exelsior's engine's were considered transwarp engines at the time (and were not a failure*) but once the technology became widespread and commonplace the 'transwarp' became to mean warp techologies even beyond that, such as the Borg warp drive.

    (* The adoption of this new type of warp engine was the reason why the warp scale was changed.)
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2012
  7. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    I remember one fan-created idea of transwarp in which it was just a really more powerful engine, where speeds of up to Warp 20 (8,000c) were possible. But that was before TNG was even thought of.
     
  8. SicOne

    SicOne Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    As good an explanation as any.

    I think they need to do something new with the existing post-TNG/DS9/VOY warp speeds. Warp 9 is fast. Warp 9.5 is bloody fast. Warp 9.9 is hellafast. But now we're in Warp 9.975 and such territory. And recently in Trek literature we're into quantum slipstream drive. All of the Warp 9-plus numbers are getting blurry. I think even the slowest Trek ship can go, like, Warp 6. Time to redo the scale again?
     
  9. Jerikka Dawn

    Jerikka Dawn Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    I concur with this. I think a linear scale as well, based on some metric of velocity, whether it be light years per hour, parsecs per hour, or whatever -- regardless of the underlying technology involved.

    So whether a starship is using warp, ultrawarp, transwarp, slipstream, or whatever, the Captain just decides how fast he wants to go and says "Hyperspeed Factor 14" or whatever, and that's like 140 light years per hour.
     
  10. Unicron

    Unicron Continuity Spackle Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Location:
    The Pyxis Unity
    Perhaps they should do something like what Star Wars does, where the speed of traveling through hyperspace is determined by what class of hyperdrive you have. The lower the number, the faster you go. It's still only a very relative gauge, but it solves the problem of warp factors getting perpetually higher.
     
  11. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    The thing with any kind of warp scale is having writers and producers agree to stick with it. If you establish that a ship can only go so fast, it really has to be enforced and not tossed out the window when someone later gets the itch to break it. Otherwise, warp scales and various FTL systems are really kind of irrelevant, more meaningless technobabble than anything else.
     
  12. Tiberius

    Tiberius Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    But that was contradicted by "In a Mirror Darkly".
     
  13. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    Which by that definition contradicts "The Tholian Web." So it might be best to say that the interphasic rift is also a space-time distortion that could end a vessel anywhere or anytime during an uncontrolled flight.
     
  14. publiusr

    publiusr Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    I never liked the transporter tech link--but since it was introduced by JJ with transwarp beaming--a handy thing--here is one way it might work:

    You don't beam the ships warp ahead of itself--we will call that a reporter getting ahead of himself as with the Curiosity findings. Instead, like subspace radio that is faster than the ship, the tech acts as a cutwater to allow the ship behind to have an easier time establishing the warp bubble--even as some SLBMs use a spike ahead of the nosecone as here: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/c-4.htm

    Slipstream drive just does this only more so. Even as the smoke ring self sustaining Romulan plasma torpedo may latch on to a retreating ships bubble and be drawn towards it--perhaps a ship with a massive star directly ahead might allow a slipstream to feel such a distortion in space (gravitational foci instead of solar foci) and allow faster than normal transit but in straight lines only. Work this a bit more, and you get Star Wars hyperspace lanes?
     
  15. Tiberius

    Tiberius Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    In what way does In a Mirror Darkly contradict The Tholian Web?
     
  16. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    How does "In A Mirror Darkly" contradicts Mr. Scott's Guide?
    :confused:
     
  17. Tiberius

    Tiberius Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    It's been a while since I read it, but doesn't it say that the interspatial rift in Thloian web was completely empty? No stars or planets?
     
  18. Timo

    Timo Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    ...And? What reason is there to believe the rift wouldn't have been empty from the other, "IaMD" side as well?

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  19. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    I don't recall any stars and planets inside the rift in "In A Mirror Darkly."

    Personally, I thought any possible contradictions regarding the rift between Mr. Scott's Guide, "In A Mirror Darkly," and "The Tholian Web" were neglible to non-existent or could be easily explained away.
     

Share This Page