The Maquis or the Federation?

Discussion in 'Deep Space Nine' started by los2188, Aug 4, 2012.

  1. Ian Keldon

    Ian Keldon Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Never mind that they were responding to Cardassian attacks, right Timo? They should have just let themselves be murdered in their beds by Cardassian terrorists in the name of "peace".

    Even Nechayev didn't buy that.



    No, they were summarily TOLD what was going to happen, despite their protests. The Federation never took their rights or desires into consideration when crafting the treaty.

    It's like if the US suddenly ceeded Texas back to Mexico to settle some dispute and simply ordered the Texans to move out.

    Do you think they would take that laying down?

    No. Nor should they.

    Your fascism is showing again, Timo. The first duty of ANY government is to protect the lives, rights and property of it's citizens against foreign aggression.

    Or they would be hailed as great national heroes if they succeeded, and become known by names like the Founding Fathers.

    Ok, now I know either you are trolling or have one sick mind (or both).

    Pack up your stuff...I have just decreed YOU don't need to have and live wherever it is you do. See how YOU like having your property and life stolen from you.
     
  2. Mage

    Mage Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007

    Anarchy is a misunderstood concept. Literally, it means nothing more and nothing less then not believing in the benefits of a single ruler or rulingbody. End of story. All the other horror stories connected to anarchy are the result of punk teenagers in the (mostly) the UK, who had no sense of identity and used a misinterpreted version of anarchy as something to rally behind, thinking it ment they could plunder, riot and be violent. That's not what anarchy is.

    And just because leaders are chosen by the people, doesn't automatically mean that all there actions are just and right. Just look at history to see how that has worked out so well over the centuries.

    And honoustly people, some of the reactions of people in this thread.... It's just and right that these colonists were burned for not listening to their government?? That's not really the message of understanding and having respect for others and their opinions that Trek is teaching us.
     
  3. Mage

    Mage Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007

    Isn't that basicly what happened with the war for independence in the United States? When the colonies said we want to be independant? When England said no? And then the colonists and England went to war? Over a random piece of property...?

    Not trying to start a flame-war here, just playing advocate to the devil. But it seems a bit weird that some people are judging the Maquis for something that other leaders or groups of rebels have been praised for in the past.
     
  4. Jono

    Jono Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Location:
    Australia
    Governments tend to have provisions for resuming private land, so its questionable that the Federation had no right to hand over planets to the Cardassians. Not to mention that these planets were in a disputed region, which brings in the question whether the Federation or the Cardassians had the right to settle on some of these planets at all.

    I feel sorry for those who where negative impacted by the treaty, and maybe the Federation did give up too much in the Treaty. In the end the Federation was looking to end the risk of a restart of a war against the Cardassians while at the time there was instability in the Klingon Empire, the Romulan Star Empire had returned to prominence and was throwing its weight around, and Borg had also wandered in, destroyed a colony, dozens of ships and nearly took Earth. So the few in the DMZ were sacrificed for the greater security of many.
     
  5. starburst

    starburst Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    I wasnt advocating terrorism, only that people wouldnt be happy and may choose to say...not every colonist which decided to upsticks behind will have become a member of the Maquis. Some of them may have even gotten on fairly well with their new Cardassain overlords, at least until the Dominion War broke out.
     
  6. Timo

    Timo Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    That's really mature... "He started it! I have the right! I have the right!"

    Yes, yes. Sieg Heil and all that - Iron Crosses to everybody! Killing is brave and bold and walking away is non-Aryan! And we hav teh Rigth!

    What property? You told me to pack "my stuff" - ergo, I still have it. And I definitely am walking away with my life.

    So I happen to change address. Big deal. You expect me to come and rape your wife and eat your children for that? Fat chance, pervert!

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  7. starburst

    starburst Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    With that logic you could say that the response to Pear Harbour or 9/11 was immature...parties in each instance were attacked and decided to respond.
     
  8. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    Watch "Journey's End" again. The colonists specifically requested to stay in the DMZ and live under Cardassian rule, and they were allowed to do this. It was their idea. The Federation wanted to move them, but was persuaded not to.

    The actual signing of the peace treaty was not done with the colonists' consent, but it didn't need to be. It was done because the Federation had this thing about, you know, not wanting to go to war with Cardassia ever again. Given this, the opinion of a few hundred wannabe-revolutionaries just doesn't seem quite so important.
     
  9. Romulus Prime

    Romulus Prime Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2012
    Location:
    The broken state of California
     
  10. sonak

    sonak Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Location:
    in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination

    So your position is that anytime a small minority of citizens disagree with the decisions of a legitimate, democratic government, that they have the right to violently resist that government and wage war?:confused: How would you ever have a functioning society? In a democracy, on any given policy you have a number of people who disagree with the current one. If they took up arms every time they felt they had a cause, you'd have chaos.

    And again, it wasn't like the UFP was being absurd or tyrannical here. Making some minor border modifications/swaps in the interest of long-term peace is certainly defensible and reasonable.
     
  11. DonIago

    DonIago Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2001
    Location:
    Burlington, VT, USA
    ^^You're right, if the Federation doesn't have absolute faith in the parties with which they're considering signing treaties, they should refuse to do so at all. And if war results? Well hell, that's so much better than an imperfect peace.
     
  12. Mage

    Mage Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007

    I believe that if you want to come across as a government in which all parties are taken into consideration, you can't just give away territory for the greater good. That way, you are in essence betraying the principales in which that government was based. The Federation believes that EVERYONE has a right to live a happy life. By forcing people to move out of their homes, you are not letting them live the life they want.
    I can understand how you say you could wake away from your home, your planet, your friends, your life. And some of the colonists did as you would. Some didn't.

    The colonists were given a choice, move or life under Cardassian rule. They were never asked if they were oke with the Federation giving their homes away.

    And that's how we come to Sisko's comment in "The Maquis". How it's very easy for people living in actual paradise to ignore how life is in the colonies. That these people were not living in the same kind of luxury that the core worlds of the Federation have. They chose to go out there, and create a world instead of simply living in one. The Federation says 'sure, go ahead, good for you'. But suddenly, when the Federation feels they have a better purpose for those planets, they suddenly say 'yeah, you know, we kinda need those worlds. And technically, they are still ours, so sorry'.
    Can you blame the colonists for not trusting the Federation, for fighting for what they build?
     
  13. Nightdiamond

    Nightdiamond Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Location:
    California
    You have to wonder if some of those colonists put themselves in that situation in the first place.

    Establishing colonies right on the border of Cardassian space- where territory is hotly disputed.

    It wasn't just the colony in Journey's End, but obviously other colonies as well. They must have been warned too.

    If they were made aware of the situation and went ahead anyway, then I don't know.

    They had the right to defend themselves, but I'm a big believer in looking before you leap.

    The Federation is said to have plenty of planets for inhabiting and as stated before, all needs and wants have been easily taken care of already.

    What's with the need for extreme risk taking like this?
     
  14. R. Star

    R. Star Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Location:
    Shangri-La
    Given some of the Maquis on Voyager cited being born on those colonies, it's perfectly reasonable to say they were settled before the first Cardassian/Federation war. They would have to be, being the Setlik III attack was the first aggressive act by the Cardassians.
     
  15. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    You not only can, you MUST. There must always be a balance between the greater good and the lesser. The needs of the many will always outweigh the needs of the few (or the one).

    Given that there are vast amounts of territory still available in the Federation, and that relocating the colonists to such territory is easy, then I can totally see why the Federation might choose to sign a treaty like this. The choices are these:

    1) Do nothing, which will ensure war with Cardassia, in which millions will be killed.
    2) Relocate a few hundred colonists.

    Now tell me, which is the better option of those two?

    The Federation is indeed attempting to provide a better life to its citizens, core worlds and colonies alike. By signing the treaty, war is averted. I'd call that a better life.

    You can't always get what you want.

    Actually, the colonists themselves brought up the idea of living under Cardassian control.
     
  16. Hartzilla2007

    Hartzilla2007 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Star Trekkin Across the universe.
    Not to mention that the Caradaasian attackers were supported by their government which was against the treaty.

    Also not to mention that the federation was ignorant of said treaty violation as well as the fact that both sides in the DMZ were shooting at each other.
     
  17. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    ^ Which brings to mind the question, were there innocent Cardassian colonists who were being harassed by armed humans?

    Given Eddington's attitude, and assuming there were other Maquis like him, I find that rather likely.
     
  18. Hartzilla2007

    Hartzilla2007 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Star Trekkin Across the universe.
    Actually there was no mention of how easy or hard it would have been on screen.

    In fact when the novels mentoned it the writers went with the belief that it was difficult as other worlds in the federation now had to deal with a large refugee influx.

    So basically do what the Cardassians want or they kill you.

    Well that's a very diplomatic race right there :rolleyes:

    So that particular treaty which the Cardassians didn't even bother honoring was the only way to prevent war?

    Which would mean that the Federation is sticking their nose in a Cardassian internal matter.
     
  19. -Brett-

    -Brett- Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2001
    Forget the Maquis. What about that Dominion war? Millions dead because those entitled douchebags on Earth were too selfish to relocate. Shame on anyone who supports the Federation. Peace is worth more than some random property, after all.
     
  20. DonIago

    DonIago Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2001
    Location:
    Burlington, VT, USA
    Oh please. One could just as easily say the DW never would have happened if the Maquis hadn't been entitled douchebags who pushed Cardassia into the alliance.