Star Trek Transporter - not practical!

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by larryman, Jul 30, 2013.

  1. larryman

    larryman Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
  2. Data's Cat

    Data's Cat Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2013
    Location:
    Texas
    That's ok. I didn't want to be teleported into space anyhow...
     
  3. MacLeod

    MacLeod Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Location:
    Great Britain
    Well we already knew they were impractical due to Heisnberg's uncertainty principal.

    Though I believe the Heisnberg compemsators work quite well, thank you. :p
     
  4. Metryq

    Metryq Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    And bees can't fly, either.

    (I understand the "bees can't fly" story is urban myth. However, the point of the story is valid: the "proof" of a model is only as good as the model. Reality may differ. The STAR TREK transporter is fictional. It is never stated exactly how it works, and episodes/movies conflict with each other in what characters say and/or what we see the transporter do. For example, it is evident from "That Which Survives" and THE WRATH OF KHAN, when Kirk and Saavik are conversing during transport, that the transporter does not take a 3D "snapshot" of the transported subjects. So the students in the article did not "prove" teleportation is impossible. They merely "falsified" one notion of teleportation. One cannot prove a negative.)
     
  5. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    In 2004 they teleported an atom. I'm surprised in nearly a decade we haven't heard anything more about it.

    BBC

     
  6. Psion

    Psion Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Location:
    Lat: 40.1630936 Lon: -75.1183777
    That's a neat article, but one thing that stood out to me was they appear to be assuming information is sent uncompressed. For example, they claim an estimated 10^10 bits per human cell. That's fine, but it seems to me that there will be a lot of redundancy when you go through every cell in a human body. In fact, I'd expect much of them to be nearly identical to other cells.

    Of course, this then introduces a processing problem as some kind of computer now has to dig through all that data and figure out how to compress the data prior to teleportation.

    On top of this, I prefer to view Star Trek's transporters as iconic. That is, they represent a technology that moves people and things without the need for landing craft, without necessarily being an exactly accurate portrayal. The explanations that we've been given over time therefore represent the best explanation various writers can come up with without actually having a real, working such technology to reference. So I don't get too hung up on the explanations given in, for example, "The Savage Curtain", or Geordi's and Reg's dialog as being more than just set dressing. Real world discoveries and inventions will continue to give better and better explanations and future incarnations of Star Trek will incorporate some of these ideas.

    Oh, there's been plenty of news. Last year, for example, there was news about having teleported over a distance of nearly ninety miles. In 2011, wave packets of light were teleported.
    The mainstream media has become bored with teleportation news for now, so I don't expect to hear much about it from that quarter until someone does something of major financial importance or teleports something alive.
     
  7. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Thanks. Scientifically, I don't see how teleportation will be ever possible the way the Trek depicted it. From what I've read even if many of the problems related to computer speed and storage are solved in the end basically the process would be to create a complete copy of your body including your memories and incinerate your existing body. And then reconstruct that copy as a perfect replica some where else.

    Couple of things occur to me if that ever became possible:

    1. Humans could become immortal by re-creating themselves at a younger age as a clone with existing memories

    2. Who in their right mind would want to transplanted into a clone of themselves?

    Because of these and I'm sure other moral issues surrounding cloning and in theory immortality - these issues would make teleportation problematic regardless eveb if it is ever technically feasible.

    As an aside - even in Trek they are inconsistent on this issue. In Enterprise the inventor of the Transporter [forget his name] strongly refutes the notion that it's cloning.

    However in Next Gen - we have at least three episodes that suggest that cloning is at least part of the transport process.

    The episode where Thomas Riker is created. And the episode in which Dr. Polaski [sp?] is de-aged using the machine.

    And the episode in thish Guinian et al are turned into children and then turned back into adults.

    Another interesting article about how it is impractical. However it's interesting to note that the author says only 1 zetta byte exists world wide when we know now the NSA is building a 5 zetabyte storage facility right now.

     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2013
  8. YellowSubmarine

    YellowSubmarine Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Why would you place such limitations on bandwidth? You can transport a human body with a wagon. All cells and all information about them. It seems that the bandwidth to transport an entire human body is there and readily available, there's no physical limitation to stop it from happening. There's no specific reason why an energy beam of unspecified kind wouldn't be able to convey the same information in a different manner.

    Besides, nobody says that a transporter has to be beam-based, ephemeral microwormholes work just fine and are much less messy.
     
  9. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    If you're referring to the FoxNews report, take it with a big grain of salt.
     
  10. Snaploud

    Snaploud Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2001
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    Bingo. They've basically just proven that we're not able to instantaneously teleport a human via current technology...which isn't especially insightful.
     
  11. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    That still fails to answer the moral questions if the processing of transporting is cloning or not? If the process is a hybrid process of cloning your congitive abilities and memories into an exact replica of oneself - who would want to engage in that process and what are the implcations?
     
  12. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    But nobody will ever find out. If you die at point A and your clone appears at point B, there's no way to find out if you really died. And if you just copy yourself (meaning both you at point A and your clone at point B are well and alive), it isn't a useful means of transportation.
     
  13. Deckerd

    Deckerd Fleet Arse Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Location:
    the Frozen Wastes
    A clone is not the same as the original. In other words even if you had a machine that could make a facsimile of a body after destroying the original, the facsimile would be a different person because cloning does not replicate a personality. The simple reason for this is that every personality is unique.
     
  14. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Cloning, yes, because a clone is born and needs to grow up. Copying like a transporter does, no, because a duplicate of your exact current state is created. Granted, nobody knows what happens to your personality for certain because nobody has tried it, but it's highly probable that your personality is copied in its exact state. If you can duplicate all molecules, all neurons and all charges between neurons, you have copied the entire state of the brain at that current moment.
     
  15. Noname Given

    Noname Given Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    None Given
    ^^^
    And that's my issue - the particular 'conscious awareness' that is me would effectively cease to exist at the transmission point - (IE 'I' would for all intents and purposes be dead.) The copy at the reception point (assuming everything went well) would be a new 'conscious awareness' and would retain all my experiences/memories; and live on from that point (until he decided to teleport again); but again my original 'conscious awareness' will have ceased to exist. <--- So, yeah, no thanks. :)
     
  16. Data's Cat

    Data's Cat Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2013
    Location:
    Texas
    I've read that when animals are cloned in the laboratory, their personalities are different. People who have a beloved pet cloned are not getting the same animal.
     
  17. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    But you don't know if any of that is indeed the case. We have no idea was consciousness is. So we can't say what happens to it. And we will never be able to determine it because no one who was beamed can tell you if he's real or a copy.
     
  18. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    As an aside, Trek tries to play both sides of the fence on this. In Enterprise the creator of the transporter strongly denies the process is cloning.

    However, several episodes in TNG especially lead us to believe it is hybrid cloning because a duplicate Riker is created and they able to age and de-age people using the device to solve plot problems.

    Also remember in TOS Kirk's 'essence," is reassembled from essentially nothing.

    As I said earlier - if transporting is ever possible it's cloning. I don't think many people would be interested in the process for ease of travel.
     
  19. Kathy Kringle

    Kathy Kringle Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Location:
    Captain Kathryn
    I heard some kids from a college (I forget which one) transported a single photon about 140 km.
     
  20. PurpleBuddha

    PurpleBuddha Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Even if copied in the exact state, its still a copy. If this could be done without destroying the original, the concept would be more clear. What materializes 'over there' is a copy of you. I might shake his hand but wouldn't volunteer to be killed knowing that my copy will live on.