Star trek final frontier directors cut finished

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies I-X' started by tmosler, Jul 7, 2013.

  1. CaptPapa

    CaptPapa Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Location:
    I really do not know . . .
    Aside from the 'how can it be a director's cut if the director isn't doing it' issue - what's this about new special effects? Did I read that correctly? Someone (or group) has paid for new special effects for a major motion picture on the off-chance that the studio will come along and pay for it after the fact? Either I'm missing something, or I need some waders . . .
     
  2. BillJ

    BillJ Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    alt.nerd.obsessive.pic
    That CGI looks really rough.
     
  3. tmosler

    tmosler Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2012
    actualy most of the videos of the fx were not finished and have been improved. DigitalBits editor Bill Hunt has described the directors cut as "darmn impressive".
     
  4. LOKAI of CHERON

    LOKAI of CHERON Commodore Commodore

    Not wishing to knock the artists who put their time and energy into it, but the CG on display in the link provided at Trek Web is amateur hour. Based on that, I MUCH prefer the FX from the original.
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2013
  5. tmosler

    tmosler Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2012
    The CGI from the video look like CGI but they look well done. No matter what the new effects like it is much better then the original effects which were rushed, done on a small budget, and unable to secure ILM to do the visual effects shatner was forced to turn to Bran Ferren had previously done the special effects for Little Shop Of Horrors and Altered Beas. In the end the old special effects fell short.
     
  6. LOKAI of CHERON

    LOKAI of CHERON Commodore Commodore

    I agree the FX in the orginal movie is fairly weak in some shots. I agree the CG in the link given looks like CG.

    I do not agree they are better than the original "no matter what". It looks OK, competently done and a great effort - I couldn't do it! But it's well short of a standard good enough for a movie of TFF's ilk.
     
  7. Navigator_NCC2120

    Navigator_NCC2120 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Location:
    Sol 3
    I never understood why some people were against Spock having a half brother. Before TOS episode "Amok Time" we did not know about Spock's wife T'Pring and yet people don't complain about that, they accept it. Before this episode Spock never mentioned having a wife. So Spock having a half brother was not a problem with ST5 for me. I remember Majel Barret-Roddenberry complaining about us not knowing Spock had a half brother at a Star Trek Convention a year or two before the film was released.

    We also did not know about Kirk having a brother, Sam, until he mentioned it in an episode of TOS ("What Are Little Girls Made Of?"). Later, we see his brother dead in TOS episode "Operation - Annihilate!". People never complained about this either, they accepted it. So why is it acceptable for Kirk to suddenly have brother and it not acceptable for Spock to have a half brother?


    Navigator NCC-2120 USS Entente
    /\
     
  8. Kinokima

    Kinokima Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013

    Amok Time is the 1st episode of the 2nd season. The series was still new and things were still being established about Spock at this point. Episodes such as Amok Time, Journey to Babel, the mind meld, nerve pinch, his logic were clever things that established Spock's character.

    In fact you can argue that of the main 3, Spock was the most established character (especially by the time of the 5th movie)

    Now suddenly years later you suddenly add a long lost family member for Spock. It doesn't really add anything important to Spock. Okay it might explain why Sarek was so hard on him. But I think the fact that Spock was Sarek's only child could explain that just as well.

    Sybok dies at the end of the story but did having this 1/2 brother suddenly repeapper in his life and then die really do anything for Spock's character? I'd say no and that is my problem. Sybok for me adds nothing to the story except to add something that wasn't needed in the first place.


    edit: As for Kirk's brother in Operation not a really huge fan of that either but we weren't discussing that episode. It was also still early in the series run when we don't yet know these characters as well.
     
  9. marksound

    marksound Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Location:
    Planet Carcazed
    This is my question.
     
  10. Navigator_NCC2120

    Navigator_NCC2120 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Location:
    Sol 3
    I totally agree with you and said something similar to this about a year ago when the topic was brought up in this forum.


    Navigator NCC-2120 USS Entente
    /\
     
  11. marksound

    marksound Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Location:
    Planet Carcazed
    As far as the movie itself:

    For those who don't know, Laurence Luckinbill was/is married to Lucie Arnaz, making him the son-in-law of Lucille Ball, the former head of Desilu, who commissioned both pilots and produced Star Trek until the Paramount merger/takeover.

    In case anyone was wondering.
     
  12. Navigator_NCC2120

    Navigator_NCC2120 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Location:
    Sol 3
    Kinokima,

    Thanks for the quick response. So if it had been mentioned or shown that Spock had a half brother during TOS you would accept it, but after TOS you would not accept it, correct?

    Is there anything you or anyone else would accept or reject about the Spock character's past being revealed after TOS? I ask because I am genuinely curious. I am not trying to offend you or anyone else by asking this. For example, didn't Picard mention attending Spock's wedding in TNG episode "Unification I". Do you accept this or reject this (that Spock remarried)?


    Navigator NCC-2120 USS Entente
    /\
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2013
  13. wjaspers

    wjaspers Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    If all you naysayers should investigate a little bit more, how it was done, and especially WHY it was done, you would see that your comments are nonsens. Your comments are just made seeing a link without knowing what the story behind this "directors cut" is.
     
  14. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    That's something I noticed with many people. They only have a qualm with Sybok because he appeared first in TFF, not in TOS. For some reason.
     
  15. Kinokima

    Kinokima Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    I don't know it depends on how it was presented. It's not like I enjoy everything the way it was presented in TOS either. Like I said I am just not a fan of the "long lost" family member.

    Also not liking and accepting are two different things. I don't have a choice but to accept that Spock has a long lost half brother now but that doesn't mean I have to like it or think it was good writing.

    I'll admit I don't know because I have not seen the episode and I am not familiar with it (until now).

    Whether I like it or not depends on the execution. I am not entirely against the idea of Spock getting married again but I am not a big fan of "romance just for the sake of it".
     
  16. marksound

    marksound Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Location:
    Planet Carcazed
    I've never had a problem with bringing in new aspects of a character's history that was previously unknown. There are people you (the collective "you") have known all your lives who have relatives they haven't told you about. And why should they? If it comes up, it comes up.

    This just happened to come up in a way that fans don't like. Well, too late. You weren't on the team supervising the script, and you can't go back in time* to change it.

    *Let me know if you can go back in time. There are a couple of things I'd like to sneak past the TPD cops. ;)
     
  17. Kinokima

    Kinokima Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Well it seems that Nimoy and DC Fontana (who came up with most of Spock's family history) also were not big fans of it, so I guess I am not alone. ;)
     
  18. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    What about TWOK? It gave Kirk a never-before-mentioned adult son, along with the lost love who was his mother (although lost loves/old flames out of nowhere were a standard TV trope that TOS used multiple times). It also gave Spock a longtime protegee, Saavik, whom we'd never heard of before. And in the Director's Cut, it gave Scotty a nephew. TWOK probably sets some kind of record for the number of relationships-out-of-nowhere it introduced.

    And McCoy's daughter wasn't mentioned onscreen until the animated series. "The Way to Eden" would've been the story that introduced her, but it was rewritten heavily and she became Chekov's old girlfriend instead.


    Naturally I'm not endorsing such a reaction. I'm just wryly observing that it would inevitably occur, and I'd be happy not to have to sit through the barrage of stupidity. Essentially, I'm saying that for me, personally, adding a rock monster and new CGI to TFF would not materially improve my enjoyment of the film.

    I mean, come on, it's a freakin' rock monster. What a stupid, cheesy, lazy climax to a story about the search for something transcendent. Okay, "God" does turn out to be just some malevolent entity out for blood, but not actually seeing the entity helps it retain an air of rarefied mystery. Having it turn into a homunculus made of rocks at the end was a laughable idea, a tacked-on bit of action that had nothing to do with the story and that would've brought down even more deserved ridicule upon the film if it had been left in.

    What TFF needs to be better is not stuff being added, but stuff being removed. Cut out the impossibly high turboshaft. Cut out the nonsensical "center of the galaxy" references -- go straight from Sybok mentioning the Great Barrier to Kirk saying no ship has ever entered the Barrier. Cut out Scotty knocking himself out and that uncomfortable flirtation with Uhura. Maybe cut out or modify the insanely stupid moment where a photon torpedo -- which is supposed to be an antimatter warhead far more powerful than any nuclear bomb -- goes off not 20 yards behind the heroes and they're just knocked down rather than instantly vaporized. (Maybe cut out Sulu's "Torpedo armed" line and redo the FX so it's a phaser beam instead.)
     
  19. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Except for the "Scotty knocking himself out" bit, all those changes would perhaps enhance the experience for Trekkers because they are annoyed with inconsistencies, but wouldn't change anything for the "general audience" who don't know how many decks the ship has, how fast the ship can travel or how a photon torpedo works.
     
  20. Kinokima

    Kinokima Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013

    Once again my main issue with Sybok is he is a long lost family member that becomes so integral to the 5th movie but in the end really doesn't add much of importance to Spock's character. In fact he feels forgotten by the end of the movie. Sybok doesn't add depth to Spock's character, it just feels like a twist.

    I am not saying suddenly introducing family members is always a bad thing but Spock already had an established family in the show: characters like McCoy and Scotty did not.

    I am also not a terrible big fan of the way Kirk's son is suddenly introduced in WOK and then killed off in the next movie. Surely Kirk would care about his son dying but the movie didn't make me care. But at least this can explain why Kirk has a hard time trusting Klingons in the 6th movie.