Simpson poses nude for Playboy

Discussion in 'TV & Media' started by Chris3123, Oct 9, 2009.

  1. Chris3123

    Chris3123 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    Pensacola, FL
    No, not Jessica Simpson. Not even Ashley Simpson.








    Marge Simpson. I kid you not.

    Here's the cover: (don't worry mods, no naughty bits shown)

    [​IMG]

    :wtf:




    Oh, BTW, from the article:

    Heh.
     
  2. tharpdevenport

    tharpdevenport Admiral Admiral

    If this is real, and any guy here buys it and wanks off to it ... you shouldn't be allowed to have a penis.
     
  3. M

    M Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    You know, I wish some people weren't allowed to post their nonsense. :rolleyes:
     
  4. Zulu Romeo

    Zulu Romeo World Famous Starship Captain Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    It's not like we haven't seen her naked of course. Oh, wait...

    Interestingly... this part of the article makes a bit of a mockery of this here thread title:
    "Implied.... or implode?" :lol: [Mom, make him stop! - Lisa]
     
  5. Robert Maxwell

    Robert Maxwell Comfortably Numb Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2001
    Location:
    where it hurts
  6. Kegg

    Kegg Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Location:
    Ireland.
    So, this is the market strategy:

    Attract younger customers by showing nearly-naked pictures of a cartoon woman for cash, when those people could just as easily get more graphic porn of the same woman for free on the internet (should they, you know, be so inclined.)

    Am I missing something here? Is it the sheer novelty factor that's supposed to spur that impulse buying?
     
  7. Starbreaker

    Starbreaker Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Location:
    Chattanooga, TN
    Did you find this offensive or something?
     
  8. iguana_tonante

    iguana_tonante Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Location:
    Italy, EU
    I think it's funny. :confused:
     
  9. M

    M Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Not at all. I actually think it's a rather cute idea. That was just my reaction to the non-sequitur of the preceding poster.
     
  10. TemporalFlux

    TemporalFlux Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    Location:
    The End of Time
    And in the next issue box:

    But all you get is this.
     
  11. SeerSGB

    SeerSGB Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2003
    Location:
    RIP Leonard Nimoy
    Rule 34 man, Rule 34

    Of course we all know Lois Griffin would go all the way. none of this "implied" nudity BS

    You know someone will.
     
  12. Robert Maxwell

    Robert Maxwell Comfortably Numb Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2001
    Location:
    where it hurts
    Yeah, the folks are Playboy are failing to understand why their wares don't appeal to the under-30 crowd.

    Nobody wants to pay for porn when they can get it free on the Internet!
     
  13. SeerSGB

    SeerSGB Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2003
    Location:
    RIP Leonard Nimoy
    Well there is more to Playboy than that...used to be anyway. Good lord Ray Bardbury and Asimov both have wrote for the magazine-- for an example. Playboy has, for the most part, always been about the "Playboy lifestyle" and people aren't interested in that much anymore.
     
  14. sidious618

    sidious618 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    sidious618
    I was really hoping it'd be Jessica Simpson but since it just had Simpson in the title I had a feeling there was a twist coming.
     
  15. Admiral Buzzkill

    Admiral Buzzkill Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Lois Griffin would be on Brazzers.
     
  16. mrcoaster

    mrcoaster Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2002
    Location:
    not here
    Heh - I didn't even need the "Not her, and not her" bit. When I saw your thread title, the first thing I thought was, "Well, it probably isn't Homer since it's Playboy, so that would be Marge."

    Sure enough, that was right. I haven't watched The Simpsons in about five years or so, so it isn't like I am constantly thinking Simpsons.
     
  17. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Yeah. Playboy isn't porn. It's glamour photography of nude or semi-nude subjects. It's just not in the same category as magazines like Penthouse or Hustler.
     
  18. ToddPence

    ToddPence Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Location:
    Fairfax, VA
    When I saw the thread title and the first two lines, my thought was "Please don't tell me it's O.J."
     
  19. ManOnTheWave

    ManOnTheWave Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Location:
    ManOnTheWave
    Yes. Once upon a time Playboy was known for its journalism, its interview most notably, and its short fiction, and previews of novels in addition to having better than average glamour photos of hot young things. 'Course, I haven't read the damned thing since they interviewed Christian Slater like fifteen years ago.

    I still enjoy occasionally digging through an old one and reading an in depth interview with someone who matted greatly at the time, reading a preview of Fleming's "upcoming" Bond novel, or even seeing what sort of look was had by a grand beauty in 1967.
     
  20. Brutal Strudel

    Brutal Strudel Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Playboy was once the single greatest short fiction market in America, even over The New Yorker. That was long time ago.

    Of course, Penthouse once had great journalism, too--along with photos that were erotic in a way Playboy couldn't touch and artistic in a way Hustler wasn't remotely interested in. Hell, Penthouse spawned Omni, one of the greatest SF magazines that ever existed.
     

Share This Page