Should it have been a straight reboot?

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies XI+' started by Ssosmcin, Sep 7, 2009.

  1. Ssosmcin

    Ssosmcin Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Location:
    ssosmcin
    I'm wondering if the film should have just been a straight reboot of the franchise rather than this whole "alternate timeline" thing. Would it have really made a difference to old school fans if they just treated this like a standard remake? In their effort to not wipe out the old continuity and keep TOS fans happy, they've left the film open to deeper scrutiny such as the state of technology during the Kelvin's era, Chekov being 17 while Kirk was a cadet (and an officer before Kirk) instead of 8, how so much could be changed by killing Kirk's dad early, blah blah blah. Everything that TOS fans (of which I've been for 42 years) enjoyed about the film would still be there. I don't those guys did themselves any favors by trying to keep it tied in.

    Why? Because all of the nitpicks about character ages, technology and so on wouldn't be important. See, when I saw the film a second time, I liked it less because it didn't feel right. Because Abrams and his guys were telling me "Nero screwed up the timeline, but these are still the same people." It didn't fit, it felt forced. But treating this like Ron Moore treated Galactica made everything they chose to do fine with me. But then I saw it a third time last night and it clicked. I was in "remake" mode. Looking at it this way allowed me to swallow stuff which got lodged in my throat last time.

    Did anyone else have similar reactions? Being an old geeky Trekkie, I actually found myself mouring the loss of the things erased by Nero until I just decided it was a remake and none of these characters went through those things. Obviously, according to the script, they did and this is just my mind playing tricks. But all of this made me think that making it a remake would have just been easier.
     
  2. Middle Earther

    Middle Earther Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    I guess the most disappointing thing for me is I was looking forward to an "origins story" of Kirk and company, but this wasn't it.

    It's not the origin of TOS characters at all - the core of the characters are changed and altered beyond recognition. Only the names survive.
     
  3. CDR6

    CDR6 Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    I concur, it should have just been a straight up retelling of the original, and let the cards fall where they may. As it is, they have opened a Pandora's Box of "troubles" for both themselves and us "older" Trek types.

    To me it was a parody of the original at best, a good one at that, but a parody none the less. I would have prefered a clean break with established Trek... easier to digest I guess.
     
  4. Tyralak

    Tyralak Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Location:
    Romulus
    I really liked how they pulled this one off, personally. It was respectful to those of us who were fans of Trek since TOS (re-runs, I'm not that old) but were still able to breathe new life into a struggling franchise. Look, I was very skeptical when I heard about what they were going to do. I started to have the same "Don't mess with my Trek" feelings I had when TNG first came out. But I pushed those aside, and went into it with an open mind. I was pleasantly surprised. I really think this new version of Trek has potential. I'd even be open to the possibility of a new TV series based on the new time-line.
     
  5. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    If Trek XI was a flat-out reboot, as it should have been, it still wouldn't have wiped out the old continuity. Parallel worlds and all that.
     
  6. Crazy Eddie

    Crazy Eddie Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Location:
    I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
    That's exactly what it WAS.

    The thing that most hardcore trekkies fail to recognize (probably through unfamiliarity with other instances of this phenomenon; too much focus on Trek specifically) is that a "retelling" involves some changing/reorganizing/redesigning of events and characters in some substantial way. The most blatant examples are in anime series where often times the theatrical version is little more than fifty episodes of the series compressed into a two-hour feature (and also the transition from comic/manga to the big screen; see the various differences between Spiderman comics and spiderman movies). In sci-fi, it usually happens by completely ignoring the previous incarnations of the series and either vaguely nodding to them or completely reworking them from scratch. That the new version even makes reference to previous incarnations is typically just for the amusement of past fans; hence the "original" cylons of the old Battlestar Galactica make occasional cameos as "old models" in the rebooted series.

    Having Nimoy/fuurespock is an overt nod to existing fans. Having it fit together in a time travel narrative is charity to the clique of extremely anal canon-wonks whose vast proliferation is unique to trek fandom. Beyond that, however, it really IS a reboot.
     
  7. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    Which is charity that is totally unnecessary. See my previous post.

    For example, I'm a huge fan of original Battlestar Galactica. Did I complain that nuBSG wiped it out? Of course not, because it didn't. The two versions can and do coexist, in parallel realities. Nothing is ever wiped out.
     
  8. Crazy Eddie

    Crazy Eddie Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Location:
    I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
    Maybe so, but it's certainly to be expected when some of the people working on the reboot (Orci and Kruzman) happen to be fans of the original.

    Sure, but NuBSG also included the original cylons as "old models" strictly for the entertainment of the original fans, without explicitly paving over the old universe. Technically, the Abramsverse doesn't do this either; there's no direct indication that the universe that Futurespock comes from really IS the prime universe. It very well may not be.
     
  9. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    Even if the old cylons hadn't been included, the old universe would not have been paved over. Same story here.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2009
  10. Disillusioned

    Disillusioned Commander

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    I would have had more respect for a straight-up reboot, but I probably still wouldn't have liked that they saw fit to reboot the franchise. Still, it would have made it that much easier to say that this movie and any others it spawns had nothing at all to do with the original franchise. If it had actually been good I might've even grown to accept it on its own terms. But instead we have a time travel technobabble plot device that does a craptastic job of trying to be both a reboot and a continuation of the original franchise.
     
  11. Too Much Fun

    Too Much Fun Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Probably would have been better if it was a reboot without all the alternate reality stuff, because I thought that was the weakest part of the movie. I was loving the movie until Nero and old Spock came along and explained what they were doing. I thought without the silly plot points they brought along, it would have been perfect.

    Then again, it would have opened a whole other can of worms since then we'd have no explanation for why the ships, uniforms, Kirk's childhood, etc. were so different from what was established in the original "Star Trek", but at least in that case I wouldn't be as disappointed when watching the movie as I was when Spock and Nero presented their exposition. I'd just think after, "wait a minute...", but I'd prefer that than being exasperated in the middle of the movie at how clunky the villain's motivation was.
     
  12. Tyralak

    Tyralak Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Location:
    Romulus
    Now you've just thrown a new wrinkle into things.
     
  13. Nardpuncher

    Nardpuncher Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Location:
    Taipei
    I think for all intents and purposes it was a reboot. They just threw fans the bone of Nimoy and the lines about alternate timelines.
    I've been a fan of Trek for 24 years (becuase of the original show too) and when they mentioned alternate universes in the new movie I thought "Don't bother with this! Just go with it!" As I thought they were doing great.
     
  14. Shazam!

    Shazam! Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Batman Begins should've began with the Scarecrow going back in time to the 60's Batman movie and altering the time-line to the current Begins/Dark Knight one. Adam West could've had a cameo.

    Why didn't that happen? Because it's retarded.
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  15. urbandk

    urbandk Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Location:
    the European "canon" is here
    I disagree. I think Star Trek has had enough "reboots" that fit in existing continuity that this one can too. All the other series are reboots in Star Trek's future. This is a reboot in Star Trek's past. Because Star Trek has always played fast and loose with time travel and its implications, this movie fits perfectly well with what came before.
     
  16. Shazam!

    Shazam! Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Well, not really. Previous time-travel adventures have all dealt with making sure that the time-line is preserved. This one just goes "fuck it". I don't see how that is fitting 'perfectly well'.

    I'll ignore the part about each series being a reboot as that's clearly nonce-sense.
     
  17. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    I would have accepted a proper prequel.

    I would have really liked a full reboot. BSG style.
     
  18. Cyke101

    Cyke101 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    The fanboy in me would have wanted a true origin story set in the prime universe. It would've been interesting to see just how everyone truly got together and how Kirk picked out his crew. I was absolutely tickled when I found out that Christopher Pike would be in the film, and I liked the idea of an "origin" story set after the pilot but before Kirk's command.

    However, the film critic in me says the concept of the semi-reboot was just fine. A true origin story would have lacked a sense of concern for the main characters. Pike's kidnapping, Sulu's fall, and most importantly Amanda Grayson would have zero excitement behind them if I knew they were all going to survive from the start.

    With that said, out of all the changed histories for our favorite Big Seven, Scotty's is probably the one that makes the least amount of sense.
     
  19. Disillusioned

    Disillusioned Commander

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Well, not really. There have been others, including myself, who have pretty much been viewing this entire movie as an AU.
     
  20. Cyke101

    Cyke101 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    I semi disagree with this. Trek has had a whole lot of different ways of time travel and how to deal with it. One of the most famous time travel stories of all, TVH, wasn't about restoring the timeline at all. Heck, it seems that if time took its natural preserved course, humanity would've been doomed. In Generations, had time not been altered, the Enterprise-D crew and Veridian III would've been doomed.
     

Share This Page