sf/f TV development news - 2013

Discussion in 'Science Fiction & Fantasy' started by Temis the Vorta, Oct 10, 2011.

  1. Temis the Vorta

    Temis the Vorta Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1999
    Location:
    Tatoinne
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    This IS the show. :rommie:
     
  2. Sindatur

    Sindatur Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Yup, surely no one can miss seeing all the Admirals and Captains running around.
     
  3. Temis the Vorta

    Temis the Vorta Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1999
    Location:
    Tatoinne
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    TrekBBS: Where It's Not Just the Admirals Who Are Insane...
     
  4. Kegg

    Kegg Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Location:
    Ireland.
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Without anything to go on other than a paragraph, it's hard to say what it is. But this would be true regardless of what the paragraph is. An idea you hadn't heard of before condensed into a paragraph does not a good show make. One of the best space operas of the last ten years was a remake, which hardly sounds inspiring, and two others were a space western and a a series with a vaguely Buck Rogers premise that in paragraph form probably looked like a rehash of Lexx.

    This said, there's nothing in RHW's basic idea that precludes an excellent space opera series. It's a solid premise to build episodic plots around and also arcs of either a science fictional or political nature... and there's nothing it that ensures it'll be any good at all besides RHW's involvement.

    And as with Andromeda, RHW's involvement is no assurance the show will be good. Though the problems with Andromeda mostly came from Turbine and Sorbo, there's no guarantee RHW wouldn't have similar issues with his collaborations - TV is never a solo medium, after all - nor is he a god whose mere presence assures quality screenwriting.

    What he is, though, is a writer who's work I've personally enjoyed, both on DS9 and Andromeda ("Angel Dark, Demon Bright" was a good hour of space opera TV, damn it). So with that one small but sort of important fact - a writer I like working on a genre I love - remaining cautiously hopeful actually makes sense.

    Innovation is fine and all well and good, but more then innovation I just want a quality space opera TV show. If it's served up in a manner that's basically familiar, that's fine. If I wasn't interested in watching shows at all basically familiar, I'd try genres I'm unfamiliar with.
     
  5. xortex

    xortex Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Location:
    Staten Island, NY
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    It tells me Sy-fy doesn't want to commit to anything they percieve might fail and are already jockying for power over RHW who seems to already be stymied and compromised and controlled before he even begins. My perception is that a title is contingent to artistic conviction and integrity - ie. believing in what your doing and why and going in strong with vision and not being unsure.
     
  6. JD

    JD Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Wow, I must have missed a lot of news about this show, because I haven't gotten that from anything anyone else has said. I mean a title is really a very minor part of the concept for a show. Just because it doesn't have a title yet that doesn't mean there's something wrong, it just means they haven't decided what to call it yet.
     
  7. RJDiogenes

    RJDiogenes Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Location:
    RJDiogenes of Boston
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    No, it just means they haven't thought of a title yet.
     
  8. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Boy, you really don't know much about the creative process. Sometimes titles can help you find your focus for a work, but they're not usually as essential as that. Lots of works get their titles changed very late in the creative process, or even after they're completed.

    And there's more that affects title choices than creative concerns. When trying to come up with a title for a TV series or movie, the legal and marketing departments get involved and add hurdles to the process. The creators may have a perfectly clear vision of their creation and what they want to call it, but the network might not clear that title for use and may insist on calling it something else instead.
     
  9. xortex

    xortex Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Location:
    Staten Island, NY
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    How long does it take to clear a title legally? No, this is an artistic issue and a play for power and control. They haven't even read my 'untitled' thing yet either.
     
  10. Temis the Vorta

    Temis the Vorta Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1999
    Location:
    Tatoinne
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Okay, here's your answer. Look at this list of greenlit pilots. Several are still untitled. If you looked back to previous years' pilot lists, you'd see that shows that went to series sometimes went without titles for a fair amount of time during the development process. It means nothing.

    There is no correlation between how long a show goes untitled and its odds of a series order. If there were a correlation, the people whose livelihoods depend on getting a series order would have figured it out long before now, and everything would have a title.

    They'll need to choose a title in time for the marketing campaign to get ramped up, but since the networks haven't even gone through upfronts yet, nobody has started work on any marketing campaigns.

    As Disney could tell you now, a title can have a great deal of importance to the success of a show or ahem a movie. :rommie: Not something you want to rush into.
     
  11. xortex

    xortex Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Location:
    Staten Island, NY
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Here's my answer, however wrong it may be. If he believed in a title, it would have a title which either tells me he's not sure of what he's got or doesn't feel strongly about one title direction over the other. Either way it is not decisive and that doesn't instill confidence in me one way or the other.
     
  12. JD

    JD Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    You're making way to big of a deal out of this. As big as it may seem to people on the outside of the industry, when you're creating a series coming up with a title is really a minor thing when compared to working out the characters, series plot, and backstory.
     
  13. Enterprise is Great

    Enterprise is Great Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    And titles change. IIRC, the original title of Lost was Nowhere. Just because something has a title now doesn't mean it won't change to something else later.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2012
  14. RJDiogenes

    RJDiogenes Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Location:
    RJDiogenes of Boston
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    ^^ Yes, titles frequently change. Tales of the Gold Monkey was originally Tales of the Brass Monkey. The Night Stalker changed to Kolchak: The Night Stalker in mid season. Baa Baa, Black Sheep changed to Black Sheep Squadron between seasons. Charlie's Angels was originally The Alley Cats. Hart To Hart was originally Double Twist. The Outer Limits was originally Please Stand By. Give me a couple of minutes and I could probably think of a hundred more. :D

    It's very wrong. You clearly have no idea how many writers, including myself, have multiple untitled WIPs in their files at any given time.
     
  15. CorporalCaptain

    CorporalCaptain Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Location:
    "Who are you?"
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    There was also once this show called Enterprise.
     
  16. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Heck, Star Trek was originally going to be called Gulliver's Travels, and the captain of the ship was going to be Captain Gulliver.


    Me, I can't stand having untitled works; I always need to come up with some kind of title. However, I've been known to change the title late in the game. Orion's Hounds was originally going to be Spirit of the Hunt and then something else I can't remember offhand. Spider-Man: Drowned in Thunder was outlined as Lying Vanities. My TOS novelette "As Others See Us" went through a bunch of different titles before my editor and I settled on that one, and I still regret that I didn't push harder for "How Not to Be Seen." And my recent TNG eBook The Struggle Within was meant to be called The Courage of Conscience, but the folks at Simon & Schuster didn't think that had enough oomph or whatever.
     
  17. xortex

    xortex Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Location:
    Staten Island, NY
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    Did Sy-fy buy it or rather RHW unseen or could he be unsure about it's direction? I think he's doing that just to be kisch and cool. That's why they called him the Vulcan.
     
  18. RJDiogenes

    RJDiogenes Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Location:
    RJDiogenes of Boston
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    ^^ He's not unsure of the direction.

    True. :rommie:

    Interesting. I hadn't heard that. Thank goodness that didn't happen.

    To tell you the truth, it irritates me, too. But sometimes I just find myself getting bogged down and want to get going. Sometimes I even use placeholders for character names, which also bugs me.
     
  19. Enterprise is Great

    Enterprise is Great Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    The Hollywood Reporter has an interesting article called From 'Lost' to 'Friends,' The Strange Art of Picking a TV Title.
     
  20. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012

    I'm reminded of how Ellen DeGeneres's sitcom was originally named These Friends of Mine in its first season before some execs decided that was too bland a title and thought just Ellen would be better -- and then just a month after the first season ended, a sitcom just called Friends came along and became a huge hit.

    And it's bizarre that ABC has two shows this season with "the B-word" included but censored in the title -- and that's not long after that Shatner show with a bleeped profanity in the title. Where is this drive to profanity coming from, especially given that there's no way they can get away with it and it's only going to cause trouble? I guess it's a way of grabbing attention, but it's still pretty awkward, and it's odd that it seems to be a sudden trend.
     

Share This Page