Section 31 after DS9

Discussion in 'Deep Space Nine' started by Tom, Nov 1, 2012.

  1. JirinPanthosa

    JirinPanthosa Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    I do imagine Section 31 operating like a terrorist cell, like the organization detailed in the movie Battle of Algiers. So if one person is captured, all they know about is their direct superior and their direct inferiors.

    How do we know the things Section 31 has done other than trying to wipe out the Founders and putting Federation sympathizers in Romulan positions of power? They must be competent because they haven't been discovered, but how do you know they weren't, for instance, behind Admiral Lleyton's assignment?

    And, you're totally right about Cerberus but I'm speaking more of what they appeared to be in the second game. I believe, for instance, that they absolutely would run medical tests on people against their will in order to cure diseases or engineer biological weapons. They would rather capture a weapon of mass destruction than destroy it.
     
  2. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    Section 31 acts in its own best interest. Nothing else. They claim to serve the Federation, but if they did that, then by definition they would answer TO the Federation. They don't do that. They quite literally do whatever they want.

    An organization can't be acting in the best interests of any people or government if it doesn't hold itself accountable to that same people or government.
     
  3. Rush Limborg

    Rush Limborg Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Location:
    The EIB Network
    Problem with the line of reasoning:

    "The Federation" is not a department in the chain of command. To "answer to the Federation" can entail many different meanings. What does it mean to "answer to the Federation"?

    Not neccesarily. How many times has there been the storyline--in fiction and in real life--of someone who takes action to benefit someone else (a donation, saving a life, etc.)--and does not reveal their identity? There is little accountability there.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013
  4. T'Girl

    T'Girl Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2009
    Location:
    T'Girl
    That makes no sense. Because one doesn't necessate the other. You're implying that only the Federation's governing body can work to the Federation's best interests. Or at least what they see as it's best interests.


    The argument can be made that if S31 were involved, what happen would have been more subtle and more successful. Ultimately the coup was badly conceived and a failure.

    Would S31 step fully out into the light, engaging in a open military coup? Even through a proxy like the Admiral?

    :)
     
  5. Rush Limborg

    Rush Limborg Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Location:
    The EIB Network
    ^Agreed. Section 31 doesn't strike me as the kind of organization that would support such a radical change in the Federation infrastructure. They deal in "puppets/moles", not overhauls.
     
  6. Enterprise1981

    Enterprise1981 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Location:
    Tethered to a large plant
    That sounds about right. With that in mind, 31 only assassinated Zife and his chief-of-staff only after Zife stepped down as UFP President. As far as the public was concerned, they mysteriously disappeared. Or in the case of my fan-fiction universe, 31 simply made it look like someone else assassinated him.
     
  7. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    Yes, I pretty much am. How can Section 31 claim to be working in the Federation's interests if they are so secret? Secrecy implies corruption.

    It means, to be part of the actual, recognized governmental structure - out in the open, subject to public scrutiny, and ultimately answering TO the government and public.

    If Section 31 really was truly looking out for the Federation, and not for themselves, they'd work within the system. In fact, they'd BE the system. They would be accountable to the government, there would be oversight. None of those things applies. Section 31 quite literally does whatever it wants. By definition, then, they are only out for themselves.
     
  8. bullethead

    bullethead Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Um... no. Secrecy implies that you don't want someone to find out about something for a variety of reasons. That might include corruption, but it is not necessarily because of corruption.

    That assumes that the system is operating efficiently and is run by competent people, which is highly debatable in either Trek timeline. There's also the fact that not operating within the system means that the Federation's hands are clean if Section 31 has to do something very dirty or mess up. Also, if the Federation Council/Starfleet Command gets infiltrated by mind-controlling aliens/evil clones/evil alternate universe counterparts/etc... (again), then Section 31 has a better chance of fighting them if the Enterprise crew/whoever are the designated heroes are aren't around to save the day, because less people knowing about Section 31 means the enemy might not infiltrate Section 31 (or spend less resources on it, depending on who they replace/takeover).
     
  9. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    The visitor's bullpen
    Like you have something to hide... :evil:
     
  10. Edit_XYZ

    Edit_XYZ Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Location:
    At star's end.
    In fiction one can make S31 or similar secretive organizations as competent and altruistic as one wishes.
    In real life - accountability is the ONLY means known to mankind to prevent abuse and incompetence.
     
  11. LobsterAfternoon

    LobsterAfternoon Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    While accountability is good, it's difficult to say that section 31 is a net good or net bad for the Federation.
     

Share This Page