Regarding ShipBuilding...

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies I-X' started by KaineMorrison, Jul 10, 2014.

  1. KaineMorrison

    KaineMorrison Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Location:
    Selden, NY
    Do they even use NanoTeh, aside from the Borg?
    And teleporting cables and wires between bulkheads and walls wound not work.
     
  2. BillJ

    BillJ Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    Per Ardua
    Not that I agree or disagree with you. But I'm interested in why you feel that way?
     
  3. Ithekro

    Ithekro Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Location:
    Republic of California
    They seem to use a lot of solid state stuff in the 24th century, followed by the bio-neural stuff. But lots of Plasma conduits.
     
  4. austen_pierce

    austen_pierce Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Location:
    Virginia Beach, VA
    We've seen enough obscure gadgets that I have no problem believing that in the 24th century there will be better ways to thread wires. Heck, the wire could thread itself. Just tell it where to go.
     
  5. KaineMorrison

    KaineMorrison Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Location:
    Selden, NY
    Because the need to be placed in between other wires and cables and in joint couplers. It is too minute of a job to be that accurate with a teleporter.
     
  6. KaineMorrison

    KaineMorrison Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Location:
    Selden, NY
    All I could think of when reading your post was something similar to a Snake Charmer...LOL
     
  7. grendelsbayne

    grendelsbayne Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Location:
    Netherlands
    If the transporter can reconstitute a human being at a molecular level, it can transport wires and cables and couplers in the proper configuration. The primary function of the technology requires far MORE accuracy than this.
     
  8. BillJ

    BillJ Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    Per Ardua
    I would think energy requirements would be astronomical if they constructed a starship with transporters. But, I agree that they would be up to the job.
     
  9. Ithekro

    Ithekro Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Location:
    Republic of California
    Industrial replicators and drydock frames. The frames could be used to set the coordinates for the replicator, and they program it with holodecks to fit sections into place. This is why they even have a holosimulaton of the Enterprise-D in the first place.

    Starships are said to be modular.
     
  10. austen_pierce

    austen_pierce Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Location:
    Virginia Beach, VA
    It takes three to five years for the US Navy to BUILD aircraft carriers. Slightly longer for new designs. Design and planning would add a couple of years to the beginning.
     
  11. KaineMorrison

    KaineMorrison Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Location:
    Selden, NY
    But these Ships are far more massive!

    Which leads me to a new question...
    Why was the 1701 given a refit?
    Why not just rename a different Ship?

    Was there no time to build a new ship?
     
  12. Ithekro

    Ithekro Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Location:
    Republic of California
    Ships go though refit cycles from time to time. Ships also get repurposed from time to time.

    Take USS Boston (CA-69). She was a heavy cruiser built during World War II and served during 1944 and 1945 in the Pacific. Following the war she was decommissioned as there were too many ships in the fleet.

    In 1952 she was taken out of reserves and rebuilt as the worlds first guided missile cruiser. She kept the name USS Boston, but was renumbered to CAG-1. She served in this capacity until decommissioned again in 1970. However she was renumbered back to CA-69 in 1968. This was due to her missiles being outdated, so her purpose was to use her old 8 inch guns in combat instead of her obsolete missiles.
     
  13. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, MO, USA
    The idea I've favored is that the refit wasn't originally meant to be a total redesign of the vessel. It started off as just a major upgrade to the ship's engines and then spiraled out of control. In the end, the Enterprise wound up being a testbed for a lot of new systems and hull component designs.

    "I know engineers. They love to change things."
    --Doctor L.H. McCoy
     
  14. USS KG5

    USS KG5 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    England's green and pleasant land.
    You don't really know that - it is quite possible that the various cables etc are replicated in place, or are installed by robots, or some kind of nanotechnology.

    The robots and nanites are plausible tech now, let alone in 400 years!

    There is on-screen evidence to suggest that building starships takes time, and a specialised shipyard. Building a shuttle takes a few days, so I'm guessing a starship takes at least a year.
     
  15. Timo

    Timo Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    The fun thing is, we don't really have much reason to think that TNG era starships use wires of any sort in the first place!

    The last time we actually saw macroscopic wiring in use aboard a starship was on the 2280s-vintage (but presumably oft-refitted) USS Hathaway in "Peak Performance". For all we know, ships from the 2360s are utterly wireless, for transfer of data, power, and transporter matter streams alike.

    Those famed "plasma conduits" could carry all of the above and more, and be trivially simple to lay, as in "Phantasms" et al. they appear to feature as much intricacy as plastic plumbing today...

    That aside, it's remarkable that we have basically never witnessed starship construction of any sort. It's always refitting, or test-sailing an already completed ship, or repairing existing vessels. Indeed, our only proper example of starship construction prior to ENT or the first reboot movie was from the Mirror Universe, where a Defiant class vessel was put together in primitive conditions in what appeared to be mere weeks.

    Admittedly, a Defiant is small, but she's still as large as a Miranda by all appearances. If she requires weeks, a Sovereign might take months - but not years.

    An interesting side note here is that we never saw any evidence of newbuild ships in the Dominion War, save again for a single Defiant class vessel. All other starships seen fighting sported registries lower than those of the DS9 and VOY hero ships, and their designs predated the war (or were kitbashes from components significantly predating the war, FWIW). If Starfleet doesn't manage (doesn't choose?) to build any ships during this crucial multi-year conflict, should this be taken as proof that it's impossible to build starships in any time shorter than decades, and an interstellar empire engaging in a war thus shouldn't even try? That is, unless they are betting on a decades-long conflict, which may be too pessimistic a policy for anybody to accept.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  16. LordMudd

    LordMudd Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 6, 2014
    Location:
    Pasadena, TX.
    I would assume that the experiences of Starfleet going back to Enterprise and before with regard to how long it takes to design and build a ship would eventually lead to a continuous design program that never stops upgrading new tech into starship designs and adjusting those designs based on the needs of the tech to be able to function. Construction yards would be modular to adjust to dimensions and many systems would be prefabricated off site. The use of transporters to move components to site would cut shipping costs as well as difficulties arising from circumventing obstacles.


    CCC.
     
  17. Neumann

    Neumann Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Location:
    Sol III
    For all we know, the Akiras seen on FC are actually warships and are generally closer home (core systems) than out on deep space!
     
  18. austen_pierce

    austen_pierce Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Location:
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Good point. I hadn't considered that. There was a Trek book that came out after the TNG episode featuring Kelsey Grammar, in which the Miranda class was referred to as a border cutter. Starfleet may indeed keep certain classes reserved for certain tasks.
     
  19. Ithekro

    Ithekro Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Location:
    Republic of California
    It is possible that there were new ships built, but it was far faster to refit and reactivate older ships to counter the massive Dominion fleets.

    The Dominion seemed to be able to produce new ships even after getting at least two of their shipyards destroyed by Starfleet and the Klingons. And this is using Cardassian resources and any worlds they may have captured in the war. Also the Dominion would only have the timeframe of the war to construct new ships in Cardassian Space, as prior to that they'd have been moving ships from the Gamma Quadrant. And these aren't the Cardassian ships, these are the Jem'Hadar ships. Both large and small.

    No telling of the Klingons are building new ships. Even their new ships look old on the inside due to the lighting.

    No clue about the Romulans. They seem to have new ships following the war, with some clues that some of them may have been used during the war. We only see the standard Warbirds in action.

    We see a little of Starfleet's shipyard over Mars in 2371 in a Voyager time travel episode. It looks mostly like they are rebuilding older ships and new Galaxy-class ships. Or building new ships using the old classes designs (as if those old production lines never stopped building Excelsiors).
     
  20. austen_pierce

    austen_pierce Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Location:
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Didn't you know Excelsiors last forever? :)