Quantum of Solace - Grading & Discussion

Discussion in 'TV & Media' started by Agent Richard07, Oct 27, 2008.

?

Grade the movie...

  1. Excellent

    22.3%
  2. Above Average

    41.7%
  3. Average

    23.0%
  4. Below Average

    8.6%
  5. Poor

    4.3%
  1. Zeppster

    Zeppster Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Having watched it again, I think it was better than when I first saw it. It wasn't a story like Casino Royale was, it was more like an actual Bond film although it did expand on some of the plots from Casino Royale, which is more than you can say for most Bonds. Outside of a few small references most Bond films ignored anything that happened in the last Bond films. There really wasn't as much of a story to tell here. It just wanted to start with what Quantum was and make it more of an enemy for future movies. It's not like SPECTRE which was basically gone after Diamonds are Forever. Also SPECTRE never developed, it was just evil and that was that. Maybe now we can get future movies that explain what the bad guys really are.

    They want to make the Quantam story line enough to last several Bond films so that Bond can go on another 20 years or whatever. But they did have a lot of key character moments in this one. He was trying to become a better agent, not just a killer even though his temperment didn't allow him to use his restraint till the end. There isn't the memorable moments of Casino Royale. But that movie had really been written for a couple of years before it was being made.

    I do hope they do a little better job in writing the next one, even if it means that there's a little extra time between this movie and the next movie. The writting for QOS wasn't near as good as it was for CR, I will agree to anyone on that. But it was still a really solid Bond outing and one of the better Bond films.
     
  2. Good Will Riker

    Good Will Riker Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Southern California, USA
    ^^^

    Wow, this is the longest single response I have ever read from you Zeppster than your usual "2 sentence responses."

    Why the change?

    You sound really passionate about this series -- like us. :cool:
     
  3. Zeppster

    Zeppster Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Don't usually have much to say, and I really haven't been around a lot lately because of school.
     
  4. Good Will Riker

    Good Will Riker Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Southern California, USA
    ^^^

    Thanks for giving us more insights after a 2nd viewing.

    Next time, I hope that the Broccolis hire a director more like Martin Campbell and less like Marc Forster.
     
  5. Zeppster

    Zeppster Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    That may be true, It doesn't really matter though. Marc Forster isn't doing the next one, he's already said he's not coming back. But I don't think directing was a problem in this one. I felt it was a well directed movie.
     
  6. Good Will Riker

    Good Will Riker Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Southern California, USA
    Whoever was responsible on the second unit directing of "the way too close to the camera, and shaky" action sequences definitely should not return for the next entry.

    Whoever was in charge of viewing those dailies clearly does not understand the theatrical concept of "widescreen." :rolleyes:
     
  7. S. Gomez

    S. Gomez Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    I really liked it. Not as good as Casino Royale, but then you can't expect near-perfection from every Bond movie. I think the aspect I appreciated most was the one thing the Bond movies have almost entirely lacked: continuity. When I heard that this film would follow on directly from the last one, I about jumped up and down in excitement (except for M's new office, but there's any number of explanations to explain remodelling... like, maybe, remodelling). Hopefully they'll continue the trend of not ignoring what's happened in the past and we'll see more of Quantum and what their goals are in future installments.

    I did like the last scene very much (maybe the best part of the movie), and although curious about what Bond said to Vesper's boyfriend, I don't think the fact that it happened offscreen really detracts from it in any way.

    There was some stuff I wasn't wild about: The editing in the action scenes was one of them, as has been mentioned. I think some of the plot (particularly the tagged bills, which was told in such a rush I couldn't follow it at all) could have been made just a little clearer, and maybe a few more jokes added ("We are teachers on sabbatical... and we have just won the lottery" got the biggest laugh when I went to the theatre). Also, while I loved the dark homage to Goldfinger, it feels like it may have been in the wrong movie, or revealed in the wrong way, if that makes any sense to anybody; I'm not sure what I'd do to improve it, but there ya go.

    I gave it "Above Average". I can't give it "Excellent", but that's purely on the basis of it not being Casino Royale.
     
  8. archeryguy1701

    archeryguy1701 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Location:
    Cheyenne, WY
    ^I think the movie curtailed quite nicely into a third movie. Heck I noticed for the first time today (it's amazing how much more clear things because when you watch it at noon rather than midnight) that Mr White was alive in the opera house! I fully expect to see him again in the next movie.
     
  9. Good Will Riker

    Good Will Riker Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Southern California, USA
    I just hope that the problem of action sequences shot too close to the camera is corrected in the next EON James Bond outing.

    I just hope that the way the action sequences were filmed doesn't effect one's viewing in the comforts of one's own home.
     
  10. archeryguy1701

    archeryguy1701 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Location:
    Cheyenne, WY
    ^Those sorts of fight scenes are usually much easier to watch on a small screen than they are in the theaters.
     
  11. Nerroth

    Nerroth Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    It wasn't too bad - but there were a couple of elements I felt somewhat uncomfortable with.

    But anyway...

    The scene in Haiti made me think of The Bourne Ultimatum - only that scene in Morocco was handled much better.

    For me, this movie didn't pick up until Tosca. That was a great scene, and things seemed to flow much better afterwards.


    I kept thinking of how much better a follow-up movie could be if it was done by Paul Greengrass, and had a certain other character known as JB thrown into the mix...
     
  12. suarezguy

    suarezguy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Between below average and poor but I had to go with the latter. The villain and political message were somewhat interesting, but otherwise the story not there or badly done (Craig's not that interesting), the action scenes were too long and excessively shaky. Didn't like that Mathis turned out to be innocent and thought his acting wasn't as good as in CR.
     
  13. Starkers

    Starkers Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    Location:
    Behind enemy lines
    Well I've seen it twice now and have to say that I like it even more on the second viewing. The editing of the early action scenes still annoys a bit, but I found I could follow the car chase a lot better second time around, and the titles/theme didn't grate as much either.

    I'd still say this was better paced than Casino Royale and a much tauter film...I do think it was maybe one draft light in terms of the script but I guess that's the writer's strike for you.

    I seriously can't beleive some critics didn't see the humour in this, or hear the familiar Bond riff that was played several times within.

    Really looking forward to Bond 23 now :D
     
  14. Trekker4747

    Trekker4747 Boldly going... Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Location:
    Kansas City
    Went to see this movie tonight, yeah I'm several weeks late.

    First of all, I'm still not 100% sold on Craig as Bond. I like him, but he just doesn't "feel like" Bond to me. Secondly, I think this movie and the current franchise misses Q, the gadgets, the gadget-car, etc. and the Bond Girl, cute as she was, wasn't... "Bond Girl"-y enough.

    But in the end I liked this movie. The action scenes were good, better (and more of) than CR's. Pretty much I enjoyed this movie, felt more like Bond than the bulk of the Brosnan films, but this line of films is just missing something... "Bondian."
     
  15. JacksonArcher

    JacksonArcher Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2001
    That would be Dan Bradley, who was the second unit director on all three Bourne films, Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man 3, Superman Returns, Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and much much more. He's one of the busiest and more talented second unit directors working today.
     
  16. trevanian

    trevanian Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Bradley is getting buried alive on the bond websites as the antichrist, but it is more the cutting (not Forster's cutter, the other cutter, the Bourne idiot that the Broccolis brought in) than the shooting that is the prob, I think.

    You can go with close views and wide views and the sequence design would probably work, but when you select only close views and cut the way they did (that idiotic cut- five-times-for-a-single action bourne approach that seems designed to mask BAD choreography, at least in the first one, the only Bourne I was able to suffer through [thank you Clive Owen]), the designed choreography gets destroyed. The DP and Forster both talked with Bradley about doing everything different from Bourne, and the DP really dislikes the BOURNE approach too, so again, this sounds like the producers messing with the product, not the director.
     
  17. The Borgified Corpse

    The Borgified Corpse Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2000
    Location:
    Ouch! Forgotten already? You were just down ther
    I hated it. I think Daniel Craig is giving an excellent effort. He's very good at what he's doing. I just don't see what he's doing as even remotely recognizably Bond. I miss Q. Even more, I miss the quips & the suaveness. Even the hallowed Sean Connery wasn't above throwing in a few puns here & there. Daniel Craig's Bond is just a joyless, immature, petulant thug. Hell, John McClaine from the Die Hard series shows more charm than Craig, even when he is all tuxedoed up.
     
  18. Trekker4747

    Trekker4747 Boldly going... Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Location:
    Kansas City
    ^^^

    Yeah, I agree. It just missed some "bondness." The quips, the gadgets, the car, the gadget-filled car. Watch "Goldfinger" and then watch "QoS" and you'll see a classic, awesome, definitive Bond movie and some pale imitation.

    The oil-covered woman, though, in QoS was a nice nod.
     
  19. Zeppster

    Zeppster Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    There are plenty of quips with Craig's bond. And there's some good cars too. Just not all the gadgets.
     
  20. Trekker4747

    Trekker4747 Boldly going... Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Location:
    Kansas City
    "QoS" just "missed something" that made it "Bond."

    It didn't feel like Bond to me. Not Bond Bond, at least.

    Makes me want to watch Goldfinger again.
     

Share This Page