Q & A Query (SPOILERS)

Discussion in 'Trek Literature' started by EJA, Jan 16, 2008.

  1. EJA

    EJA Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Okay, I'm reading Q & A at the moment, and there's just something that's nagging me. The prologue states that "They" periodically destroy every universe that comes along if it's inhabitants don't impress them. But later on in the book, lots of other universes become endangered at the same time as the "main" one. So do "They" wipe out entire multiverses rather than single universes at the end of every cycle? Kind of like the Conjunction of a Million Spheres in Michael Moorcock's fiction? Hope you can clear this up for me.
     
  2. KRAD

    KRAD Keith R.A. DeCandido Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 1999
    Location:
    New York City
    Hm. Thinking about it, the term "multiverse" probably would've been more appropriate to use than "universe," but "universe" is a more generally recognized term -- "multiverse" is a little too Marvel Comics. :D

    So to answer your question, yeah, They wipe out every damn thing and start all over.....
     
  3. Technobuilder

    Technobuilder Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    I had the same question when I initially read Q&A, but assumed it was just what KRAD said. The term "Universe" used to describe the entirety of existence, thereby including all multiple realities and possibilities.

    At least now I know that I was correct in my assumption.
     
  4. EJA

    EJA Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    We're marvelous, aren't we? ;)
     
  5. EJA

    EJA Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    But if the idea is that They wipe out entire universes because the inhabitants aren't "right" enough for Them...doesn't that imply that the inhabitants of all the universes turn out the same way as one another? No offense, but I can't help finding that a bit hard to swallow in light of what we already know about parallel universes. Being all independant of each other, they could never all reach the same conclusion.
     
  6. LightningStorm

    LightningStorm The Borg King Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Location:
    Kansas City
    I don't think that implies anything like that. It simply states that They don't like the inhabitants of any of the "universes" that exist.

    For a much much smaller comparison, if you had say a million different items and didn't like any of them, that does not imply that all million items are (say) apples. You might have an apple, an orange, a computer, a chair, a desk, a car, a... etc.
     
  7. Smiley

    Smiley Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Location:
    Chandler, AZ
    Let's face it. They are very capricious beings, and They will do whatever They want to do.

    One thing I wonder about is how long They will give Picard's multiverse before subjecting it to another trial.
     
  8. Ronald Held

    Ronald Held Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    On the USS Sovereign
    AFAIK, Julie Schwartz invented the term Multiverse for the DCU. It was used at DC long before it appeared in research papers.
     
  9. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Well, despite the tendency to use the terms interchangeably, alternate timelines are not separate universes. They're different quantum states of our universe. Our universe was born and then began diverging into different timelines, different histories. But all those histories are part of the same universe, descended from the same origin. Destroy that universe and you destroy all its timelines, all its histories, all its Jean-Luc Picards and Datas and Messrs. Mot. But it's just one universe. Or multiverse, if you prefer. (Which is an etymologically questionable word; "universe" means "one from many," so "multiverse" actually means "many many.")

    A different universe would be a completely different place. It wouldn't be a place where the same planets and people exist but they're evil instead of good or they all wear cowboy hats. It would have different galaxies, different planets, different species -- maybe even different laws of physics that don't allow those things to exist in the first place. (In Trek, a good example of a different universe would be Species 8472's fluidic space.)
     
  10. EJA

    EJA Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    ^ I think there's some indication that whole other universes could develop in similar ways to one another. There's the instances where the Trekverse crossed over with the Marvel Universe (in Star TreX, Second Contact, and Planet X), and that had humans in it.
     
  11. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    ^^But those are apocryphal stories that aren't meant to represent anything that "really" happened in the Trekverse. They don't count.
     
  12. DS9forever

    DS9forever Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Could I go a bit off topic and ask if the planet Gaia is the one seen in DS9: Children of Time?
     
  13. EJA

    EJA Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Couldn't the same thing be said for all the Trek literature, Q & A included?
     
  14. David Mack

    David Mack Writer Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Location:
    New York, NY
    ^ How to win friends and influence people in the TrekLit forum, ladies and gentlemen. ;)
     
  15. EJA

    EJA Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Talking of Q & A, why is Q so concerned about the survival of the universe? After all, I think it's been established in other fiction (e.g. Mike Friedman's Q Continuum trilogy, Planet X, and Peter David's Missing in Action) that the Q have access to all universes. And in the epilogue to Missing in Action, Q and his son are actually shown to exist outside all the universes (multiverse?) and even destroy one such universe themselves.
     
  16. KRAD

    KRAD Keith R.A. DeCandido Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 1999
    Location:
    New York City
    As I said, They would destroy the entire multiverse and start from scratch. That includes the Q-continuum, as Q himself said in the book.
     
  17. Quimby

    Quimby Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Location:
    NJ
    I just wanted to mention how much I loved the sequence near the end of Q & A with the little vignettes giving us peaks of other Trek universes. I am an alternate universe junky and literally could have read and enjoyed an entire book in that format.
     
  18. JD

    JD Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    Have you read Q-Squared? The whole book jumps back and forth between our universe and two others.
     
  19. EJA

    EJA Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    So in your imagination, all those alternate Enterprises near the end are from alternate universes within a multiverse, rather than alternate quantum timelines within a single universe?
     
  20. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    *sigh* Those are just different ways of describing the same thing: the first is a vernacular description, the latter more technical. It's not an either-or question.
     

Share This Page