Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

Discussion in 'Science Fiction & Fantasy' started by Scroogourner, Jul 12, 2013.

?

How do you rate Pacific Rim?

  1. A+

    31 vote(s)
    24.8%
  2. A

    35 vote(s)
    28.0%
  3. A-

    15 vote(s)
    12.0%
  4. B+

    25 vote(s)
    20.0%
  5. B

    7 vote(s)
    5.6%
  6. B-

    2 vote(s)
    1.6%
  7. C+

    2 vote(s)
    1.6%
  8. C

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  9. C-

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  10. D+

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  11. D

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  12. D-

    3 vote(s)
    2.4%
  13. F+

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  14. F

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  15. F-

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Scroogourner

    Scroogourner Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Sojourner
    .....aaand Godwined. Thread over.
     
  2. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    :lol: Technically not. Never used the, "N" word. ;)
     
  3. EyalM

    EyalM Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Location:
    Haifa
    An entertaining but really dumb movie.

    The wall seemed to be an ill-conceived way of having the Jaegers working with no resources.
    Why not surround the rift (or what ever it was called) with a hundreds of those blasters the hero Jaeger had?
    It also seems silly to station the Jaegers on land and wait until the monsters make (or almost make) landfall, when the Jaegers are water proof and could have been stationed next to the rift on rotating duty (no need to spread them out).
     
  4. Scroogourner

    Scroogourner Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Sojourner
    eh, close enough.;)
     
  5. Shurik

    Shurik Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2003
    Location:
    Haifa, Israel
    Everything that happens in this movie, happens because why not and because of rule of cool.

    Every engineering undergrad can pick this movie apart in about 10 seconds. Just sit back and enjoy the ride.
     
  6. Star Wolf

    Star Wolf Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Location:
    ciudad de Los Angeles
    Might as well put upThe Trope Pacific Rim page
     
  7. Noname Given

    Noname Given Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    None Given
    ^^^
    Pretty much this.

    I loved the film and found it very entertaining (and still hope we'll see a sequel); but you CAN'T look too closely at the plot. :lol:;)

    I mean come on - they KNOW exactly where the portal is; and have for years and are even able to predict, practically to the second, the next incursion. Given that, WHY build giant robots at all? Just set a nuke or two up at the portal, timed to go off as soon as a kaiju steps/swims through?:rofl::techman:
     
  8. Shurik

    Shurik Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2003
    Location:
    Haifa, Israel
    It's also much easier to build 1000 bombers which can be armed with bunker busting type of rockets, have them in the air as soon as kaiju shows up and blast the damn thing until it drops dead.

    There's a rocket that can penetrate 60m of reinforced concrete. I'm sure it's much easier and faster to build thousands of those than one giant robot.

    But again, this movie is so entertaining that none of its logic and common sense defying plot points are able to diminish the fun of watching a giant robot punching a giant monster in the face with oil tanker.
     
  9. Star Wolf

    Star Wolf Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Location:
    ciudad de Los Angeles
    By the logic :rofl: of the movie they must have tried that with the existing inventory before the Battle of San Francisco went six days. Only giants can stop giants and for years they swung ships and cargo containers at the kaiju in hand to hand combat before trying a purpose built sword as a last ditch weapon
     
  10. Yminale

    Yminale Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Location:
    Democratically Liberated America
    Kaiju are only vulnerable to massive amounts of kinetic energy (like a rocket power fist) or nuclear radiation. Conventional explosives just doesn't work.

    The problem is that Kaiju move (quite fast when they want to). Bunker Busters are only for fixed installations.
     
  11. Yminale

    Yminale Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Location:
    Democratically Liberated America
    1. They tried that and it didn't work. The aliens just sent more Kaiju.

    2. Irradiating the ocean is not a good idea.

    3. The Kaiju will just keep coming. Even worse they are coming with increased frequency and number.
     
  12. Shurik

    Shurik Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2003
    Location:
    Haifa, Israel
    Kaiju were susceptible to being frozen, burnt, cut and blasted with plasma cannon. I'm sure rockets would do just fine (and that's how the first kaiju were probably defeated, before the robots) and more bigger rockets would do even better in a real world. As to bunker busters - drop 100 of those at the same time at the general area where kaiju is expected to move and statistically you would hit it. 100 is not enough? Then drop 200. It would probably still be cheaper and faster than building and maintaining 30 giant robots.

    Also, the world that had invented and built giant robots with mind-melding pilots in 14 months, could invent bunker busters with homing mechanism that could hit a moving target. This is again the part where applying logic and common sense to the idea behind the movie is pointless.
     
  13. Yminale

    Yminale Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Location:
    Democratically Liberated America
    Not sure about the frozen part but I don't remember Kaiju being susceptible to being burned. The Plasma cannon appear to punch holes in Kaiju rather than burn them. Cutting still uses kinetic energy.

    Rockets would do fine since that's the primary weapon of Stryker Eureka but I would argue that they don't have explosive warheads. Axehead was killed by a nuclear device.

    But that was one of the problems, the collateral damage plus the spread of Kaiju remains. Jaegers could deliver the same amount of destructive force and not endanger an entire city

    I was thinking about the same thing. Instead of a bunker buster a more effective weapon would be a "Rod from God"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

    That being said Jaegers are more adaptable and won't splatter the Kaiju all over the place.
     
  14. Noname Given

    Noname Given Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    None Given
    No. In the film they stated they tried to send a nuclear bomb to the other side (the Kaiju's dimension) - and that never worked as the portal was thought to be 'one way' (until the end of the film of course).

    They never stated they tried just wringing the portal area on our side with nuclear bombs that detonated as the kaiju finished appearing.

    As for irradiating the ocean - the U.S. did that for years in the 1950ies; and they found the ocean itself dispersed the radiation so well, the waterbourne environmental impact was negligible. (The effect on the land portions of the Bikini Atoll were greatly affected; but again, we're talking underwater. ;))
     
  15. Yminale

    Yminale Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Location:
    Democratically Liberated America
    The info came from the comic "Pacific Rim: Year Zero". It was realized quite early that dropping nukes was not a productive strategy.

    What you just stated is myth promoted by the Nuclear energy industry and the US Navy.

    Here is the truth.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1446783/
     
  16. Mister Fandango

    Mister Fandango Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    So why wouldn't dropping even a small fraction of the materials they were using the build the wall on top of the hole, or at least build something confined to that area instead? If they honestly thought the wall could keep them out... well, I just don't understand the thought process there. Why waste thousands if not millions of times as much material as needed to construct the wall would they could have just clogged the portal? And even if they couldn't clog it with the same relative amount of metal as they wasted on the wall, they obviously had thousands if not millions of times as much material to make it even more hardcore.

    It just seems odd to me.
     
  17. Pilot Ace

    Pilot Ace Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2002
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    Just got my Limited Edition Blu-Ray package of the movie today. Excited to watch the special features tomorrow--watched a few tonight, loved seeing how gleeful Guillermo got while working on it.
     
  18. Edit_XYZ

    Edit_XYZ Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Location:
    At star's end.
    The mechas are quite inefficient as weapons.
    Just take the plasma cannon, make a lot of them and put them on a perimeter along the inter-dimensional door.
    You can always make them mobile with tanks, planes, etc.

    No need for hand-to-hand combat against the kaiju in order to kill them effectively.
     
  19. mickmike

    mickmike Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Location:
    far beyond the stars
    I seem to recall something being said about the fact that the kaiju were getting stronger and adapting to the tactics being used against them. Hence the Jaegars, who being robots with human pilots would be a lot more unpredictable to fight against and therefore hoepfully stand a better chance in combat than a weapons platform.

    Of course the real reason is it would have been pretty boring to see the awesome kaiju fighting a rocket launcher :hugegrin:
     
  20. Mister Fandango

    Mister Fandango Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    As opposed to any other vehicle with equally unpredictable human pilots?