Orci: Why This Certain Villain

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies: Kelvin Universe' started by TrekToday, May 24, 2013.

  1. TrekToday

    TrekToday Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 1999
    Star Trek into Darkness Co-writer Roberto Orci explained why a certain villain was included in the film. According to Orci, the villain was a result of wanting to relate to Star Trek history. Spoilers behind the cut for those who haven’t yet seen the film. “[Damon Lindelof] argued for Khan from the beginning and I [...]

    More...
     
  2. sj4iy

    sj4iy Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 17, 2013
    Location:
    US
    Good :)
     
  3. Kpnuts

    Kpnuts Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 1999
    Location:
    London
    Interesting. I think some people need to relax, these guys know what they're doing.
     
  4. sj4iy

    sj4iy Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 17, 2013
    Location:
    US
    Anything that gives me Benedict Cumberbatch saying "I will walk over your cold corpses" can only be a good thing.
     
  5. Flake

    Flake Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2001
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    I think they wrote something without Khan like they said and then after he was inserted by Lindelof the other parts of the script that reference Trek history were also added but with a twist.
     
  6. I am not Spock

    I am not Spock Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2001
    Location:
    Australia
    If they were so intent on having Khan, why all the secrecy? They should have mentioned it in the trailers, it would guarantee more bums in seats. The John Harrison stuff, the Blue Harvest secrecy, probably backfired on them a bit
     
  7. bbailey861

    bbailey861 Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Location:
    bbailey861 -- Kingston, ON
    ^I agree. In the end, nuKhan was a well executed villain. Different enough from the old universe to make it very fresh, yet enough similarities remained to make him very identifiable. I don't think keeping his identity a secret was necessary and if properly played up may have helped the film be more successful.
     
  8. Cinema Geekly

    Cinema Geekly Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    YES! That is the argument to make. To many people are trying to make the "why do Khan at all" argument. There is an easy answer to that question. These are the first guys to reboot this franchise, you always play with the best toys first. This is a common theme in Comic Books when a new team takes over Batman OF COURSE they do their own take on Joker and Penguin and yadda yadda.

    The real argument is why did they go with the Henri Ducard fake identity gimmick? Clearly that is why they never reveled the real villains name in trailers and such even though it was a badly kept secret.

    Ultimately though Orci and Kurtzman said on the Empire Online Podcast that they can't keep people away from spoilers but they aren't going to bend to them just because they chose to read spoilers ahead of time. They said the Khan reveal was the reward for those who chose not to be spoiled ahead of time.
     
  9. JarodRussell

    JarodRussell Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    I didn't know who Henri Ducard or Ras Al Ghul was, and the fake identity gimmick was a general theme in the film. Theatrics and deception, and everlasting symbols that cannot be killed. Wayne has a fake identity, his master has one as well, and both Batman and Ras Al Ghul are those everlasting symbols.


    But with nuKhan, it's just one mystery for the sake of mystery. It doesn't even have a purpose in the film, it has only a purpose on the other side of the 4th wall, to play with the anticipation during promotion.
     
  10. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Location:
    Behind the mask of Donald Draper
    Well said. Almost right after Kirk and "Harrison" meet face to face, Khan says his true name. He is not hiding it at all. Its Admiral Marcus who is. I do not think it would have changed the drama to have it revealed in the promotion.

    They are naive to think this was ever a real secret. All the secrecy alone was a huge sign that the reveal would mean something to most viewers and not just fans. Anyone other than Khan would not have been known to most people. So "hiding" it was a huge tell itself.
     
  11. Maurice

    Maurice Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Walking distance from Starfleet HQ
    I doubt saying "it's Khan" woud have put "more butts in seats" since the majority of the moviegoing public probably doesn't know or care who Khan is.
     
  12. chardman

    chardman Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Location:
    The home of GenCon
    Maybe the months and months of free hype generated in the fan community in all those debates we had about who we thought/hoped/dreaded Harrison really was? (I mean... there are threads in this very fora, from barely a week prior to release, presenting arguments that Harrison was Gary 7, Gary Mitchell, a genetically engineered tribble, Arne Darvin, etc.) Seriously... months and months of utterly free promotion doesn't warrant asking "why", but "why not".

    WTF?!? I'm pretty sure that Starfleet giving Khan a false identity probably had something to do with not wanting to advertise the fact that they had found, freed, and were working with a notorious historical war criminal. That seems a more than ample in-universe reason to me.
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2013
  13. sj4iy

    sj4iy Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 17, 2013
    Location:
    US
    Eh, for those who are wondering why keep it a secret, I agree with Abrams' take on it: there are very few surprises left in movies these days. It's shocking and wonderful when you get that "Oh shit!" moment. I've seen it several times and the reaction each time was absolutely great- gasps and people saying "OOOH!". I was ruined on accident because someone wrote a big spoiler on a UK site that had absolutely nothing to do with Star Trek, so I was upset that I didn't get to have that reaction. Really, the last time I had that reaction in a movie theater was watching Fellowship of the Ring for the first time. So I'm glad they didn't spoil it as part of a marketing campaign. Word gets around eventually.