Kirk's First Command?

Discussion in 'Star Trek - The Original & Animated Series' started by Albertese, Mar 12, 2014.

  1. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    During the time of TOS the term starship was used to signify something quite distinctive. But I wouldn't give it too much weight. Factually any vehicle capable of interstellar flight is indeed a starship even if it's slower than light.
     
  2. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    "Factual" seldom has anything to do with terminology, though. Factually, any fighting vessel in our reality is a battleship, after all, but the special terminology has a special area of application, and a very narrow one at that...

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  3. Robert Comsol

    Robert Comsol Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2012
    Location:
    USS Berlin
    I'm afraid we are applying too much retroactive thinking here, which has partially been influenced by the inflation of the term "starship" because of Star Wars and others ("Princess Leia's starship") in the past decades.

    Unless someone can tell differently, I believe that 1960's terminology was mostly referring to rocketships, spacecraft and spaceships, so "starship" had a special connotation to it (and was the name for that ill-fated TV series proposal in the 1970's by Gene Roddenberry).

    So I'd say that should the context in which to discuss the issue. :)

    Bob
     
  4. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in it's final stage
    IMHO the backstory from TMoST pure conjecture, no more valid than the novels and comics that have later postulated non-destroyer first commands for Kirk. The Enterprise could even be his first command, since I don't recall any canon mention of a prior one.
     
  5. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    My point is I wouldn't get too hung up on how the term starship is utilized in TOS.
     
  6. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    This.
     
  7. Nerys Myk

    Nerys Myk A Spock and a smile Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    AI Generated Madness
    Some have interpreted Dehner's line in WNMHGB as meaning that.
     
  8. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Yes. I think it does affirm the point. It also makes much more sense that an officer would have to have at least some prior command experience before being given command of one of Starfleet's best ships.
     
  9. The Old Mixer

    The Old Mixer Mih ssim, mih ssim, nam, daed si Xim. Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Location:
    The Old Mixer, Somewhere in Connecticut
    Dehner's line is delivered in such a way as to suggest that she's talking about another ship...and a previous, more military-oriented command is strongly implied in "Whom Gods Destroy", when Garth praises Kirk as having been a great military commander, to which Kirk responds, "I'm mostly an explorer now."
     
  10. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    But for all we know, all that means is that Kirk was in command of the Enterprise during a more militaristic time in recent history (i.e. the Federation-Klingon conflict which ended in "Errand of Mercy"), and then after that incident there was more time for exploration missions.

    It's my opinion as well that the Enterprise was Kirk's first command. He does mention two other ship that he served on in the past (but not as captain), but never mentions a previous command. If the Republic was Ensign Kirk's first assignment after graduating the academy in 2254, and the Farragut was Lt. Kirk's second assignment in 2257, and was captain of the Enterprise at least by 2265, that doesn't leave a whole lot of wiggle room between being a lieutenant and a starship captain (unless he was in command of the ship without having the rank of captain).
     
  11. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    TOS had a sense of credibility to its universe and world building rather than the arbitrariness of something like JJtrek. In the TOS universe you have to train, gain experience through various postings and earn your stripes to rise in rank. This is backed up by how things are generally portrayed in the series and the biography of Kirk (taken from the Writer's Guide) seen in The Making Of Star Trek. So it makes perfect sense that Kirk had to prove himself before being posted to command one of Starfleet's best ships.

    Unlike JJtrek where a cadet punk gets rewarded the top prize simply for being lucky.

    I'll take the TOS version of events, thank you. There's more sanity there.
     
    OpenMaw likes this.
  12. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Who the hell was talking about JJTrek?
     
  13. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    It's a matter of underlining how Gene Roddenberry and the writers approached Star Trek in terms of world building. Yes, Kirk is an exceptional commander...to a point. He still has to go through the stages like any other Starfleet officer and that includes rising in rank to command. Kirk's biography outlines him having a prior command and it's referenced in WNMHGB. That's what GR wanted and that's how it's put across. And it makes sense.

    In today's world (or that of the 1960s) no neophyte without prior command experience will be posted as Captain of an aircraft carrier or battleship. You have to earn that position. And GR wanted to get that parallel idea across in TOS as well.
     
    OpenMaw likes this.
  14. Hartzilla2007

    Hartzilla2007 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Star Trekkin Across the universe.
    Assuming that the Constitution-class was Starfleet's best ship class.

    Some trek fans for some reason have a need to complain about the JJ films in most threads regardless of whether or not it has anything to do with the topic or that fact that it's kind of annoying to still be complaining about the film after 5 years.
     
  15. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    This doesn't even deserve a response.
     
  16. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    ^Sorry, but he's right. You quoted my post when you responded with your diatribe against JJTrek when my post had absolutely nothing to do with it. If you were trying to take my post out of context just to make some rant about Abrams, I don't appreciate that. I could care less whether you like JJTrek or hate it; was talking about Kirk from the prime universe just like everyone else in this post. And I don't recall the OP being about a comparison between the two.
     
  17. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    And I was using a prime example of arbitrary thinking to underline TOS' much more credible approach to world building.
     
    OpenMaw likes this.
  18. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Oh, is that what you were doing? And here I was thinking that you were just finding some paper-thin excuse to rant about Abrams. Silly me.
     
  19. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    TOS had an amazing amount of subtext to it. A lot of referencing and suggesting what lay "beyond the bulkhead" so to speak. This is particularly true in terms of its world building. GR sketched out a biographical outline for Kirk in the Writer's Guide which includes a reference to his first command of an equivalent of a "destroyer class vessel." And this biographical reference is re-affirmed in Dehner's spoken reference in WNMHGB as well as the more indirect reference in "Whom Gods Destroy."

    It hangs together credibly in the kind of universe GR and TOS are trying to depict. I see no reason to dispute it.
     
    OpenMaw likes this.
  20. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    And yet, I do. So there you go.