Did Picard make the right decision with the Son'a/Baku

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies I-X' started by Godless Raven, Apr 11, 2013.

  1. Charles Phipps

    Charles Phipps Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2011
    Yeah, they lucked out with their refugee status.

    Also, no one ever ASKED THEM their opinion the medicine issue.
     
  2. DonIago

    DonIago Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2001
    Location:
    Burlington, VT, USA
    The movie unravels rather quickly if someone asks them about it and they have no problem with it.
     
  3. Kevman7987

    Kevman7987 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    May 20, 2013
    Location:
    Erie, PA, USA
    Same reason they didn't just fly the eagles to Mount Doom in the Lord of the Rings.

    Poorly paraphrasing a quote I saw once by J.R.R. Tolkien; "Yes. They could have flown the eagles there in the first book, but then their adventure would have been quite short and there would be no point in reading or writing the story."
     
  4. Belz...

    Belz... Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    Solution: don't invent the Eagles in the first place.
     
  5. Charles Phipps

    Charles Phipps Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2011
    Or throw in a line.

    "The Eagles won't approach the Ring lest it destroy them. I have spoken to them and blah-blah."
     
  6. T'Girl

    T'Girl Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2009
    Location:
    T'Girl
    And the Baku never ASKED THE GALAXY if the people in the galaxy would like to share in the magic particles.

    Selfish bastards.

    :)
     
  7. Edit_XYZ

    Edit_XYZ Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Location:
    At star's end.
    'slippery-slope' is a logical fallacy.
    An unique immortality drug is not dime a dozen dilithium.
    The measures taken to obtain an unique immortality drug are not the measures taken to obtain dime a dozen dilithium.
    That former does not imply the latter.
     

Share This Page