China to land rover on Moon by end of this year

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by DarthTom, Aug 28, 2013.

  1. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    I guess we continue to fall behind

    NY Times
     
  2. R. Star

    R. Star Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Location:
    Shangri-La
    I wouldn't say fall behind yet, but we will if we don't start moving forward again.
     
  3. Lindley

    Lindley Moderator with a Soul Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Location:
    Bonney Lake, WA
    So the Chinese will be the first ones to get HD moon images, I guess. At that range streaming is even within the realm of possibility.
     
  4. Relayer1

    Relayer1 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Location:
    The Black Country, England
    I didn't realise China had purchased Land Rover...
     
  5. Alidar Jarok

    Alidar Jarok Everything in moderation but moderation Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    We recently landed a rover on Mars. I'm not sure why the Moon is more impressive? In both cases, we're talking about unmanned rovers.
     
  6. Galileo7

    Galileo7 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Location:
    east coast United States
    Agree.:vulcan:
     
  7. gturner

    gturner Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Location:
    Kentucky
    We falling behind more quickly than ever. The Russian Security Council might ban export of the RD-180, which powers the Atlas V that put our Mars rovers up and is supposed to launch the Orion multipurpose crew exploration vehicle.

    link
     
  8. Mr. Adventure

    Mr. Adventure Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2001
    Location:
    Mr. Adventure
    If they put a Land Rover on the moon I'll be impressed.
     
  9. SiddFinch1

    SiddFinch1 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Location:
    State of Mind
    Maybe it will provide incentive to the US space program.
     
  10. scotpens

    scotpens Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    It would make one hell of a TV commercial.
     
  11. B.J.

    B.J. Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2004
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    I really don't see us falling behind. We've sent several rovers and orbiters to Mars, and we've also sent many orbiters to the Moon recently. Just because we don't have a rover on the Moon doesn't mean we've fallen behind, not by a long shot. In fact, I'd say China still has a long way to go before they catch up.
     
  12. Lindley

    Lindley Moderator with a Soul Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Location:
    Bonney Lake, WA
    If we were really that far ahead, we could whip up a moon rover of our own and beat them to the punch. We can't.
     
  13. Alidar Jarok

    Alidar Jarok Everything in moderation but moderation Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Well, the things cost money and time to build. If we had wanted to for some reason, we could have sent the rover we sent to Mars to the Moon instead. We didn't because it would have been a waste and we wanted to send it to Mars.

    Let's put it this way. Can China just whip up a Mars rover and beat us to Mars?
     
  14. DarthTom

    DarthTom Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Location:
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Well at the moment the US cannot even put a human being in low earth orbit to the ISS, whereas the Chinese are sending people into orbit and now a rover to the Moon.

    By my calculations while they may not be technically ahead of the US in terms of advancements in space they sure are structurally ahead of us currently.
     
  15. publiusr

    publiusr Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
  16. gturner

    gturner Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Location:
    Kentucky
    It looks like the Chinese did their homework on the CZ-9. From what I've seen they're developing a LOX/RP-1 engine similar to an RD-170 in thrust, and probably performance. Using a large tank diameter and RP-1 gives them performance on par with the SLS in a package that's a hundred feet shorter, giving them a lot of room to launch large payloads like their planned space station, or include both a capsule and a lunar module like Apollo. Adding large kerosene fueled side boosters completes the package, with 11 million pounds of thrust instead of Apollo's 7.5 or the SLS's 9, and of course they're going cryogenic on the upper stages.
     
  17. publiusr

    publiusr Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    The Russians aren't slowing down either
    http://www.russianspaceweb.com/stk.html
    http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=31049.120

    Their's look a bit taller, but height doesn't concern them apparently. I think David Christiansen wanted RD-180s under an ET derived SLS/Direct tankage, but filled with hydrocarbons...

    I really hate to hear that about the potential RD-180 ban. That is going to kill Dream Chasers ride, the Atlas V, but they do have rights to start production--it will just take time.

    We had a chance to test the Soviet Energiya equivalent to SSME, the RD-0120, which was actually trouble free, as compared with RD-170, what with burn throughs, etc.

    The RD-0120 used channel wall. I really wish we had been allowed near those, to see them and work with them.
     
  18. Argus Skyhawk

    Argus Skyhawk Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2001
    Location:
    Argus Skyhawk
    Falling behind? Until China lands a person on the moon, I won't consider them to have caught up with where we were four and a half decades ago. In the mean time, I think it's neat that more countries (and even private companies) are getting into the spaceflight business.
     
  19. RAMA

    RAMA Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 1999
    Location:
    NJ, USA

    Lots of observers felt that Russia far surpassed the heady days of landing a man on the Moon, with regular, numerous, reliable launches to a near permanent manned space station: Mir back in the 80s. The Moon is great, but simply the idea that we have permanent people in orbit above us at all times these days would have amazed me in the 70s when I was a kid.

    The SLS may keep us neck and neck with other countries, but it's the private space industry that is the real driving force these days.

    RAMA
     
  20. marksound

    marksound Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Location:
    Planet Carcazed
    A rover on the moon? Pfft.

    Now, if China were going to put a dune buggy on the moon, well ... wait. Didn't we do that like 40 something years ago?

    It won't matter, though. If those moon Nazis found our flags they'll be ready. It'll be Chinese instead of the Japanese, but (insert here the WW2 racial stereotype you know you're already thinking). ;)