CARS spinoff "PLANES" in theaters on 8/9/2013

Discussion in 'TV & Media' started by Dream, Jun 25, 2011.

  1. publiusr

    publiusr Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Too bad Unicron Orson Wells isn't with us--he'd make a great A-380
     
  2. Dream

    Dream Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2001
    Location:
    Hotel Transylvania
    I just saw a bunch of toys from this movie being sold at the store tonight. Wow, talk about fast!:p
     
  3. bigdaddy

    bigdaddy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Location:
    Space Massachusetts

    Why do you think they made this movie? Just to sell toys.
     
  4. Dream

    Dream Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2001
    Location:
    Hotel Transylvania
  5. bigdaddy

    bigdaddy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Location:
    Space Massachusetts
    I must say it looks really good, no wonderwhy they changed their minds on the direct to DVD idea.
     
  6. Tom Hendricks

    Tom Hendricks See where the sky meets the sea, It calls me Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Location:
    Syracuse NY
    Both my boys are excited about seeing it. Cars 2 was my older sons first movie in a movie theater. Now my younger sons first theater go will be with Planes. I agree this looks to be awesome and more inline with the original Cars movie.
     
  7. DigificWriter

    DigificWriter Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 20, 2001
    Location:
    West Haven, UT, USA
    I've been perusing the Internet to see how Planes is being received in general, and I can't help but feel like people have completely missed the point. Yes, the film is formulaic and is basically "Cars with wings", but that's not really a valid criticism, IMO (I'll get to why in a second).

    All 3 of my local radio hosts who reviewed the film were quick to point out, the film has a charm of its own even though it IS admittedly very formulaic, yet all 3 of them gave the film 3 stars out of 4.

    What I think they saw that many others seem to have not, BTW, is that there are actually very few movies these days that aren't formulaic in many regards, and it is for that reason that I don't really think calling the film 'unoriginal and formulaic' is actually a valid criticism against it.

    I realize that opinions are going to vary wildly, but with most of the reviews I've seen complaining about it being unoriginal (uninspired) and formulaic, I have to question why that's such a bad thing for this film in particular when the same criticism could to some degree be leveled against nearly every other movie ever released.

    I haven't yet seen the film myself (the plans I had to go see it this afternoon with my girlfriend fell through after she started feeling under-the-weather last night) and I don't generally pay much attention to mainstream critical reviews, but decided to just see what the 'general consensus' was, and really don't think it's all that fair to criticize the movie for being unoriginal and formulaic when, as I noted above, you'd be hard-pressed to find something these days that ISN'T.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2013
  8. Admiral2

    Admiral2 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Langley
    I've seen it today.

    Yes, it's formulaic and "cars with wings". That doesn't make it bad. It's a very cood film.
     
  9. Gaith

    Gaith Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    You gotta read between the lines. Movie critics hate to call a movie "boring", because their job is to write an interesting review, and it's very difficult to make the opinion that something is boring interesting. Also, critics are loathe to admit to being bored, because they think they're too smart and cultured to suffer that state.

    So you can bet that, if the main theme of a review is that the given movie was "uninspired" and "formulaic", the critic was bored out of his/her damn mind.

    ... Which was almost certainly the case here.
     
  10. Corran Horn

    Corran Horn Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2001
    Location:
    I-L
    I liked it. My kids loved it. It was derivative of Cars (no shit) but I liked Cars a lot.
     
  11. FreddyE

    FreddyE Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    I guess we will get "Boats" and "Trains" too somewhen. And for good measure they will do a crossover called "Vehicles" after that ;-)
     
  12. Admiral2

    Admiral2 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Langley
    I was thinking that when I left, but you probably won't get "Boats", unless we're talking speedboats. Anything else would only travel about as fast as a car on a highway.
     
  13. Lindley

    Lindley Moderator with a Soul Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Location:
    Bonney Lake, WA
    There was an article on CNN awhile back about how the technical consultant had to fix a bunch of issues with the movie as originally animated. Things like a crop duster trying to race a jet (changed to a turboprop for vague believability), and propellers rotating backwards.
     
  14. Alidar Jarok

    Alidar Jarok Everything in moderation but moderation Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    I don't think anyone should expect anything from this movie. I guess the question is whether it's better or worse than Cars 2.
     
  15. Ríu ríu chíu

    Ríu ríu chíu Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
    And 'Trains' would seem to be rather limited, since they can only go where their tracks do.

    Although I believe sentient trains and boats DO exist in this universe...

    There is an aircraft carrier in the film, and there are also train tracks in another scene.
     
  16. od0_ital

    od0_ital Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    Location:
    Nacogdoches, Texas
    ^

    Saw it last night, and yes, the aircraft carrier & train have faces, so they to are "alive" in the Cars universe.
     
  17. Gaith

    Gaith Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    In other news, the mere phrase "the Cars universe" makes my appendix hurt. :p
     
  18. Tom Hendricks

    Tom Hendricks See where the sky meets the sea, It calls me Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Location:
    Syracuse NY
    There was a train in the first Cars movie, after Lightning McQueen rolls out of Mac and is chasing after him. He has to rush past the train, trying to catch up to Mac but it turns out to be a Peterbilt.
     
  19. Admiral2

    Admiral2 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Langley
    The carrier scenes were my favorite parts of the movie...
     
  20. Ríu ríu chíu

    Ríu ríu chíu Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
    I just saw the film - I liked it quite a bit!

    (Favorite scene in the whole film: When Dusty is flying into JFK Airport, the controllers talking to him over the radio speak in Kennedy accents. :guffaw:)

    Only thing, though:

    The carrier USS Flysenhower is sentient...so why does it have a crew? :shifty: :D